Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003965
Original file (20120003965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    14 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003965 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in Vietnam when incoming rounds landed close and scrap metal went inside his boot.  He further states he had three heart attacks and he thinks Agent Orange is a factor. 

3.  The applicant provided two photos and a driver’s license.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army, of the United States on 26 May 1967, and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13A (Field Artillery). The highest rank/pay grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 6 November 1967 through 26 December 1968.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank.

5.  The applicant's name is not included on the Department of the Army Vietnam casualty roster.

6.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Overseas Service Bar (two)

7.  There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart and that he sustained an injury as a result of hostile action or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a direct result of hostile action.  

8.  The applicant provided two photos which show a leg injury.  He also provided his photo ID.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Management) chapter 9 of the version in effect at the time, stated, in pertinent part, that a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20.  This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that he should be awarded the PH was carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that shows he sustained an injury as a result of hostile action or that he received treatment for injuries sustained as a direct result of hostile action.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

4.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003965



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003965



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018333

    Original file (20080018333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He and the applicant met several times in Vietnam. There is insufficient evidence available which shows he was assigned to an infantry unit during combat in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the PH in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004778

    Original file (20140004778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 29 (Qualification in Arms): * he qualified Expert with the (M-14) rifle * he qualified Expert with the (M-16) rifle * Item 31 (Foreign Service), he was credited with service in Vietnam for the period 9 January 1970 through 3 December 1970 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows: * he was assigned to 1st Battalion, 321st Artillery, 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam * he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024378

    Original file (20110024378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the PH. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing he was awarded the Purple Heart, that he sustained an injury as a result of hostile action, or that he was treated for wounds sustained as a direct result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he sustained an injury as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003755

    Original file (20150003755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 40-66 (Medical Record Administration and Healthcare Documentation) prescribes policies for preparing and using medical reports and records for Soldiers receiving medical treatment or evaluation in an Army military treatment facility. None of the applicant's available military medical or personnel records reference him being wounded in action on 6 June 1969 and receiving medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000155C070205

    Original file (20060000155C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders, or other documents indicating that he was ever wounded in action, or that he was recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while he was serving on active duty. The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders, or other documents showing that he was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority during his tenure on active duty, and it contains no medical treatments records that indicate he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005166

    Original file (20130005166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of this form would have listed any combat injuries and the date. These are: a. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 22 April 1966, shows he was admitted to the 106th General Hospital on 19 March 1966 after being transferred from the 85th Evacuation Hospital due to vertigo, caused by a blast and deafness in both ears. Therefore, regrettably, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004727

    Original file (20130004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record is void of evidence that shows he was wounded in action or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was assigned to this unit in Vietnam and this entry does not include the date he sustained the injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005301

    Original file (20110005301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 24 July 1967 while in the RVN; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 June 1966 through 20 June 1969 and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017486

    Original file (20130017486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant provided an SF 600 which indicated he sustained a hand injury while serving on active duty in the RVN, this evidence does not conclusively show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020022

    Original file (20110020022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The medical evidence provided by the applicant indicates he cut his right fifth digit finger. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.