Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005301
Original file (20110005301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  13 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005301 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant request Veterans Administration (VA) and burial benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Purple Heart Certificate and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 June 1966.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B2P (Light Weapons Infantryman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

3.  On 20 June 1969, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 3 years of creditable active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized to wear:

* Bronze Star Medal
* Combat Infantryman Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Parachutist Badge

4.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 1 May 1967 through 30 April 1968.

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows that during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry, in duty MOS 11B as a Rifleman.

6.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 shows he sustained a fragmentation wound to his right shoulder on 24 July 1967.

7.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 and item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

8.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board's staff reviewed the Department of the Army Vietnam casualty listing.  The applicant's name was included on the listing.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


10.  Army Regulation 600-200, chapter 9 of the version in effect at the time, stated, in pertinent part, that a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 (wounds) of the DA Form 20.  This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40.

11.  A review of the applicant's record shows he is entitled to additional awards and decorations.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  A silver service star is worn to show participation in five campaigns.  Appendix B shows the campaigns for Vietnam.  During his tour in Vietnam he participated in four campaigns:  Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II, Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, TET Counteroffensive and Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV.

13.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his entire period of service.
A commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) is not present in the applicant's record.

14.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than      3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

15.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his unit for achievements during his period of assignment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant request award of the PH.  There is sufficient evidence to support this request.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a fragmentation wound to his right shoulder on 24 July 1967 as a result of hostile action.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has been met.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  The applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his service.  There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.  Therefore, he is eligible for the first award of the AGCM for the period 
21 June 1966 through 20 June 1969, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  All units in the RVN were cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the applicant's period of assignment. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

5.  Records show he was previously awarded the VSM.  Evidence shows he participated in four campaigns phases during his RVN service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show four bronze service stars.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 24 July 1967 while in the RVN;

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
21 June 1966 through 20 June 1969 and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Purple Heart
* four bronze service stars to be affixed to the previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005301





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005301



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103983C070208

    Original file (2004103983C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The applicant provided no evidence and the evidence of record provides no information regarding the applicant being wounded in action a second time while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007291

    Original file (20090007291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 November 1966 through 1 November 1968 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011526

    Original file (20080011526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 8 November 1967. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 19 August 1968 and to add this award to his record at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005780

    Original file (20090005780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 10 January 1968 through 20 April 1969. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005665

    Original file (20090005665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record is void of any entries or documents that indicate the applicant was ever wounded in action or treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel, or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004174

    Original file (20090004174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for being wounded in action in the RVN on 28 March 1968 and to add the entry PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) to item 24 of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089037C070403

    Original file (2003089037C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    These orders awarded the applicant the PH for wounds he received in action while serving as a SP4 in the RVN on 20 March 1967. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would disqualify him from receiving the AGCM, or a specific disqualification from any of the active duty unit commanders for whom he served, the Board finds that he is entitled to the first award of the AGCM based on his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 20 April 1966 through 19 April 1969. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008943

    Original file (20090008943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008943 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 27 July 1967 through 4 June 1969, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088438C070403

    Original file (2003088438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no derogatory information, and there is no specific disqualification from any of his active duty unit commanders that would preclude him from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) on file. During its review of this case, the Board discovered that the applicant is entitled to additional awards that were not included in either his record or his separation document. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004413C071029

    Original file (20070004413C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 2 May 1967 through...