Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010650
Original file (20090010650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	       5 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010650 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states that he was promoted to SGT/E-5.

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 18 February 1971 in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76Y (Supply Specialist).

3.  The applicant’s records further show that upon successful completion of basic combat training, he earned an accelerated promotion to the rank of private/E-2 effective 23 April 1971.  

4.  On 23 June 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Carson, CO, published Unit Orders Number 68 announcing the applicant's promotion to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 23 June 1971.  

5.  The applicant's records further show he was subsequently reassigned to Fort Hood, TX, on 8 September 1971.  He was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division. 

6.  On 17 December 1971, Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX, published Special Orders Number 4, announcing the applicant's promotion to SP4/E-4, effective 17 December 1971.

7.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the highest rank/grade he held was that of SP4/E-4.

8.  The applicant’s records show he was honorably released from active duty on 16 February 1973 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  Items 5a and 5b of the DD Form 214 he was issued show the entries "SP4" and "E-4" respectively.  Additionally, item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "17 Dec 71."

9.  There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5.

10.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders.  


11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that items 5a and 5b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders; and item 6 shows the date of rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his rank and grade should be corrected to show SGT/E-5 instead of SP4/E-4.

2.  The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 16 February 1973, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.  His record is void of any orders promoting him to the rank of SGT/E-5; and item 33 of his DA Form 20 does not show an entry for a promotion and/or appointment to SGT/E-5.

3.  Promotions of enlisted personnel to grades E-5 through E-9 were announced in orders.  In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

4.  If the applicant can provide the promotion orders or evidence that his last month of pay was corrected due to a promotion to pay grade E-5, he may request reconsideration of his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __ X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010650



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010650



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166

    Original file (20120017166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018797

    Original file (20090018797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 8 February 1972; copies of Special Orders Number 87, 136, and 229, issued by Headquarters, 3d Brigade (Separate), 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), on 5 July 1971, 23 August 1971, and 24 November 1971, respectively; a copy of the 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion Promotion Standing List, dated 30 November 1971; a copy of Special Orders Number 39, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, WA, on 8 February 1972;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010796

    Original file (20120010796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 24 February 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016452

    Original file (20140016452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    SO Number 13, issued by D Troop, 7th Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment on 14 February 1969 appointed him to the temporary (T) rank/grade of SP4/E-4 effective 14 February 1969. The evidence of record shows the applicant was advanced to SGT/E-5 on 21 May 1968. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation, on 22 August 1969, the applicant held the rank/pay grade of SP4 (T)/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013335

    Original file (20130013335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would like to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show his rank and pay grade as E-4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) he was promoted to pay grade E-2 on 20 December 1969; the advancement to pay grade E-3 and promotion to pay grade E-4 are lined through * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) all the awards listed on his DD Form 214 8. Without evidence, it appears his pay grade was E-2 at time his separation on 7 June 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006757

    Original file (20140006757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not provide any evidence. Likewise, his records do not contain orders promoting or advancing him to the rank of SGT/E-5. With respect to promotion to the rank of SGT/E-5, the evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 8 March 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029248

    Original file (20100029248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. The applicant states, in effect, he appeared before a board to be considered for promotion to SGT/E-5 and it was granted; however, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. His record contains no evidence and he has failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000016

    Original file (20120000016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows: * he was promoted to private first class/E-3, on 7 May 1971, by the authority of Special Orders Number 7, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal School, Fort Gordon, GA * he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4, on 29 March 1972, by the authority of Unit Orders Number 14, issued by Company A, 11th Signal Battalion 4. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 29 March 1972. ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002820

    Original file (20110002820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows he was promoted to SP4 on 6 December 1968, the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty and he held this rank until he was reduced to PFC for misconduct on 22 August 1969. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant was granted de facto status during the period he erroneously held the rank of SGT from 5 November 1970 to 22 November 1972. Based on the applicant's erroneous promotion to SGT and lacking evidence to corroborate the applicant's claim he did not...