BOARD DATE: 23 August 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003716
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to:
* change his social security number to "XXX-62-XXXX" instead of
"XXX-02-XXXX"
* change his separation code to a more favorable code
2. The applicant states in effect, while he was in the service he did not know that his SSN was "XXX-62-XXXX." Additionally, his separation code needs to be corrected. This error happened over 30 years ago but it still upsets him today. The separations section told him the code was incorrect and unjust.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 July 1980 and held the military occupational specialty 19D (Cavalry Scout). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5.
3. Every document in his military record lists his SSN as "XXX-02-XXXX." These documents include but are not limited to three enlistment contracts, four sets of orders, one certificate of clearance and/or security determination, two applications for identification cards, two service school academic evaluation reports (AER), and two servicemen's group life insurance elections.
4. His record contains an AER for the Basic Noncommissioned Officers Course (BNCOC), dated 27 June 1988. This AER shows he received an academic release from the course for failing mastery of military communications. Additionally, he was rated as having unsatisfactory leadership skills.
5. His record contains a Bar to Reenlistment Certificate, dated 21 October 1988. This form shows he was barred from reenlistment for writing six dishonored checks, a notification of unpaid bills, indebtedness, having a low GT score with no improvements, dishonored checks written by his spouse, academic failure at BNCOC, and being absent without proper authority.
6. He was given the opportunity to review the bar to reenlistment and indicated he desired to submit a statement in his own behalf. He was given seven days to submit his statement but failed to do so.
7. His commanding officer reviewed his bar to reenlistment on 1 May 1989 and elected to leave the bar in place.
8. He was honorably discharged from active duty, on 1 May 1989, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of expiration term of service (ETS). The DD Form 214 shows that based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was assigned a Separation code of "JBK" and the reenlistment (RE) code "RE-3."
9. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from
active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy
for the preparation of the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
10. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code of JBK is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who are discharged on completion of their enlistment under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table of the governing regulation establishes RE-3 as the proper reentry code to assign Soldiers separated with a SPD code of JBK.
11. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-3 applies to persons completing their terms of service who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation but the disqualification is waivable and RE-4 is assigned to members separated with a non-waivable disqualification.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant used SSN "XXX-02-XXX" upon his enlistment in the Regular Army. He consistently used this SSN throughout his military service. He authenticated documents, as needed, by placing his signature in the appropriate blocks, indicating the information contained therein was correct. He did not use the SSN "XXX-62-XXXX" during the period he served on active duty.
2. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed. While it is understood that the applicant desires to now record his current SSN in his military records there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.
3. He wrote dishonored checks, failed to pay bills on time, failed BNCOC, and was absent without authority and was, therefore, barred from reenlistment.
JBK is the appropriate separation code for Soldiers who have been barred from reenlistment and are discharged upon their ETS under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200.
4. Absent convincing, independent, and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it is presumed the applicant's military service records, including the DD Form 214, were correct at the time of his discharge and there is an insufficient basis to grant him relief in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x___ __x______ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120003716
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120003716
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091588C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER), dated 9 August 1996, be expunged from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's AER, for the period 15 July 1996 through 9 August 1996, shows a forwarding address for a unit in Korea. The applicant in her response and acknowledgement to the notification under the provisions of Title 10, US Code 1556 stated that she had tried for 6 years to get the erroneous DA Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070881C070402
The applicant requests that the Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) covering the period 20 April 1994 through 11 May 1994 [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted fiche of his OMPF. On 11 May 1994, the applicant was notified by the Commandant of the NCO Academy that he had been released from the BNCOC Class Number 2-94 for academic reasons. Records show the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018645
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also requests that his record be corrected by adding all training courses he completed to include North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Special Forces (SF) training. The applicant provides a Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) in support of his application.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065121C070421
He received an AER ending 19 August 1991 indicating he failed to achieve course standards and was academically released due to failing BRM (acronym unknown) qualification on three occasions. Less than one year after he was academically released from BNCOC, the applicant re-attended and successfully completed the course, competitively re-establishing himself with his successful peers. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by moving the AER for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087464C070212
The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 19 October 2000, [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant effective 19 December 2001. That so much of the application as it relates to complete removal of the contested AER be denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005069
The applicant requests: a. upgrade of his bad conduct discharge; and b. correction of his military records to show his social security number (SSN) as "xxx-x0-xxxx." In November 1970, the Secretary of the Army directed the substitution of a bad conduct discharge for the executed dishonorable discharge. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068531C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That an academic evaluation report (AER) for the period 4 January 1996 through 21 February 1996 be expunged from his OMPF (Official Military Personnel File). Statements from his chain of command, which were also included with the applicant's petition to this Board, indicated that the applicant had completed several hours of additional training in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005899
GO Number 81, issued by Headquarters, Second Regional Assistance Command, on 1 August 1972, awarded him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 8 December 1970 to 9 July 1972. The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021255
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as XXX-42-XXXX. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's SSN when he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010232
His record contains, in part: a. a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), dated 23 August 1966, that shows his issued military service number. There is only one document containing an SSN that shows the SSN the applicant claims is correct. _________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.