| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course (BNCOC) Academic Evaluation Report (AER), DA Form 1059, for the period ending 19 August 1991 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
3. The applicant states that he was released for academic reasons and he realized at the time that it was a just rating. He went back to the course in an attempt to correct the mistake he made and he achieved course standards. He believes the AER could have a negative impact on him on future promotion boards.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 October 1984. He was promoted to sergeant, E-5 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewmember) on 1 August 1989.
5. On 22 July 1991, the applicant attended Field Artillery Cannon Crewmember BNCOC. He received an AER ending 19 August 1991 indicating he failed to achieve course standards and was academically released due to failing BRM (acronym unknown) qualification on three occasions.
6. The applicant re-attended Field Artillery Cannon Crewmember BNCOC on 11 March 1992. He received an AER ending 24 April 1992 indicating he achieved course standards.
7. The applicant was promoted to sergeant first class, E-7 on 1 March 1999 in MOS 13B.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-104 states that DA Forms 1059 will be filed on the performance fiche of the OMPF. Paragraph 2-6d states that disciplinary information filed on the restricted fiche will be provided to the Command Sergeant Major/Sergeant Major (CSM/SGM)/SGM Academy selection and CSM/SGM retention boards to ensure the best qualified soldiers are selected for these positions of highest trust.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The AER for the period ending 19 August 1991 was properly filed on the applicant’s performance fiche of his OMPF; however, there is no longer any purpose for its remaining on his performance fiche. Less than one year after he was academically released from BNCOC, the applicant re-attended and successfully completed the course, competitively re-establishing himself with his successful peers. He has successfully continued his career. It should no longer be a matter of interest to promotion or other selection boards that he failed this course at one time.
2. While the historical record of his having received the AER should be maintained and it would not be appropriate to remove this AER from his OMPF, as a matter of equity it would be appropriate to move it from his performance fiche to his restricted fiche. Since it is not a disciplinary record, it would not be provided to a CSM/SGM promotion, school, or retention board.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by moving the AER for the period ending 19 August 1991 from his performance fiche to his restricted fiche.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __rjw___ __dph___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065121 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020409 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 111.0200.0011 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605941C070209
A 20 November 1990 AER from the software analyst, MOS 74F, BNCOC at Fort Gordon, Georgia, shows that she was administratively released from the course because she failed written and hands-on portion [of the course], with a recommendation that she be allowed to work in her MOS before attending the course again. She stated, in effect, that because of overstrength in MOS 74F at Fort Gordon, she did not have the opportunity to work in that MOS, and coupled with the fact that she was recently...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100052C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Records of Proceedings under Article 15, dated December 1985 and August 1986 and, the Record of Supplementary Actions, dated August 1986, be removed from his restricted Fiche (R-Fiche), in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant received NJP, under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ, on 1 August 1986, while he was serving in the rank and pay grade, Private, E-2, for committing an assault upon another Soldier on 26...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070881C070402
The applicant requests that the Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) covering the period 20 April 1994 through 11 May 1994 [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted fiche of his OMPF. On 11 May 1994, the applicant was notified by the Commandant of the NCO Academy that he had been released from the BNCOC Class Number 2-94 for academic reasons. Records show the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084312C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Memorandum, dated 21 May 1997, Subject: Declination of Consideration for Promotion be removed from his Service Fiche, General Administrative Data Section, of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) to his Restricted Fiche of his OMPF. The applicant states that he did not personally complete a promotion packet in the first place and should not have had to write a "Declination of Promotion letter." A review of the applicant’s OMPF, General...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087846C070212
The applicant requests the transfer of a DA Form 1059 dated 25 June 1999, promotion orders dated 27 September 2001 and Board proceedings dated 3 January 2003 be transferred to the Restricted fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states, in effect, that he has previously won his appeal before the Board and requests that his records be corrected by transferring the requested documents to the Restricted fiche of his OMPF in order that his chances for selection to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007884
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was considered and selected for promotion to the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 with retroactive retirement in that grade. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was considered and selected for promotion to SFC/E-7 and to retroactively retire him in that grade because his diploma for completion of BNCOC was not filed in his OMPF. The available evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091588C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER), dated 9 August 1996, be expunged from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's AER, for the period 15 July 1996 through 9 August 1996, shows a forwarding address for a unit in Korea. The applicant in her response and acknowledgement to the notification under the provisions of Title 10, US Code 1556 stated that she had tried for 6 years to get the erroneous DA Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087464C070212
The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 19 October 2000, [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant effective 19 December 2001. That so much of the application as it relates to complete removal of the contested AER be denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085663C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He states that the 26 January 1995 AER (AER #1) shows that he failed to achieve course standards. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his OMPF should only reflect the AER #2, dated 23 August 1995, which shows that he successfully completed BNCOC class 5-95, and AER # 1, dated 29 January 1995, which shows that he failed to achieve course standards for BNCOC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061235C070421
The applicant submitted a request for reinstatement to ANCOC and to the pay grade of E-7. A staff member of the Board also reviewed similar cases that have been reviewed by the Board and finds that in all such cases, the Board supported the PERSCOM decision to promote individuals who had been reinstated after they completed the ANCOC; however, it was always with a retroactive DOR (to the date they were originally promoted), with entitlement to all back pay and allowances (minus the de facto...