Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003372
Original file (20120003372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    28 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003372 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).

2.  The applicant states the DFC has never been entered on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a citation for award of the DFC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 8 December 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67N (Utility Helicopter Repairman).
3.  On 6 June 1967, the applicant departed Fort Rucker, Alabama, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).

	a.  On 2 July 1967, he was assigned for duty as a helicopter mechanic with the 2nd Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division (Air Mobile).

	b.  On 26 June 1968, he departed the RVN and returned to the United States for duty at Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia.

4.  On 23 May 1969, the applicant departed for duty in Europe.

	a.  On 10 June 1969, he was assigned to the 245th Transportation Company.

	b.  On 16 November 1969, he departed Europe and returned to the United States

5.  On 17 November 1969, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had attained the rank of specialist five, pay grade E-5, and had completed 2 years, 
11 months, and 10 days of creditable active duty service.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Air Medal

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the DFC.  ADCARS is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.  The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty.  The extraordinary achievement must have resulted in an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set the individual apart from his or her comrades or from other persons in similar circumstances.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the DFC.

2.  There are no available general orders announcing the applicant's award of the DFC.  The citation provided by the applicant is not sufficient evidence by itself upon which to base a correction of his records.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003372





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003372



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010233C080407

    Original file (20070010233C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, documents, or an award recommendation that shows he was ever recommended for the BSM while serving on active duty. The evidence of record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014142

    Original file (20110014142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and Purple Heart (PH) to her late husband and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 29 February 1968 to show these awards. The DFC and/or the PH were not included in this authorized list of awards. However, there is no evidence indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010783

    Original file (20100010783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a 13 August 2008 letter from a retired Army lieutenant colonel who was assigned to the applicant's unit in Vietnam and participated in the action for which the DFC was awarded. The applicant states he was awarded the DFC for his actions on 30 March 1969, but it wasn't included on his DD Form 214. The retired lieutenant colonel's interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) record contains GO Number 3517 and his retirement DD Form 214 shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009313

    Original file (20120009313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and Air Medal (AM) with several oak leaf clusters, and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 5 April 1985 to show these awards. The decision of whether to award an individual a decoration and which decoration to award is a judgment call made by the commander having award approval authority. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017100

    Original file (20090017100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, or Bronze Star Medal. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show award of the Distinguished Flying Cross for action in the RVN on 19 March 1970 because he was recommended for the award; however, it was downgraded to the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. There is no evidence in the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001250

    Original file (20150001250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the DFC he was awarded for action in the A Shau Valley in Vietnam should be upgraded to the DSC. He provides: * USARV Form 157-R (Recommendation for Decoration for Valor or Merit) * Proposed Citation for the DFC * General Orders for the DFC, dated 9 July 1969 * DFC Award Certificate * DFC Award Citation * General Orders for the DFC for the co-pilot of the aircraft * Information paper, subject: A Shau Valley-Private First Class (PFC), by J___ F__ * five letters of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140006210

    Original file (AR20140006210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a request for an upgrade of his award of the DFC to the Medal of Honor. d. A letter, dated 5 October 2011, wherein a Member of Congress requested the Secretary of the Army personally review a case involving a constituent who clearly met the Army's criteria for being awarded the Medal of Honor for his brave actions that save Soldiers' lives during intense combat in South Vietnam in May 1967. e. A letter, dated 3 January 2012, wherein the Secretary of the Army advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014644

    Original file (20090014644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Distinguished Flying Cross (First Oak Leaf Cluster) * Bronze Star Medal * Purple Heart 2. The applicant states the following: * He received the Bronze Star Medal and Distinguished Flying Cross with First Oak Leaf Cluster on 9 February 1968 * Neither award was shown on his DD Form 214 * He was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014515

    Original file (20110014515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 101, Fort Rucker, Alabama, dated 8 December 1966, awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 28 December 1965 to 16 January 1967. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the Good Conduct Medal to his DD Form 214 ending on 16 January 1967; b. deleting the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007437

    Original file (20080007437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no information in his records showing that he was recommended for or awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for participation in a mission on 17 January 1970 while assigned to the 335th Aviation Company (Assault Helicopter) where the Distinguished Flying Cross was awarded to other officers in his unit. The regulation states that the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United States, distinguished himself or...