Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002536
Original file (20120002536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002536 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).  He also requests to be issued the medals.  

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM and the AGCM, but never received the medals.  

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ARCOM orders, and U.S. Army Reserve discharge orders.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 December 1966 and he was awarded military occupational specialty 71B (Clerk Typist) upon completion of initial entry training.  

3.  Headquarters (HQ), Fort Myer, VA, Special Orders Number 121, dated 
14 June 1968, awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). 

4.  HQ, Fort Myer, VA, General Orders Number 158, dated 18 November 1969, awarded him the first award of the AGCM.  

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 12 December 1969.  His 
DD Form 214 only shows the National Defense Service Medal.

6.  Department of the Army, Office of Personnel Operations, Washington, DC, General Orders Number 1, dated 28 January 1970, awarded him the ARCOM.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separations Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General orders confirm he was awarded the ARCOM and the first award of the AGCM.  However, these awards are not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show these awards.  

2.  Special orders show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), but this badge is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show this badge.


BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by adding the Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and issuing him these awards.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002536



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002536



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011302

    Original file (20140011302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 23 July 1970 to on or about 3 April 1971. There are no orders in his available records that show he was awarded the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 19 May 1969 through 4 April 1971; b. deleting from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005802

    Original file (20140005802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 10464, dated 24 October 1970, awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period January 1970 to November 1970. There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Records show general orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM (4th Award) and "V" Device; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022305

    Original file (20100022305.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct ratings throughout his service. Records show he participated in three campaigns during his service in the RVN; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 September 1963 through 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026974

    Original file (20100026974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add: * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with bronze service stars * Vietnam Campaign Medal [Correctly known as the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960)] * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster [indicating 2nd Award] * Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001082

    Original file (20120001082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 15 January 1979, also lists his rank title as SP5 in item 9 (Grade). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active service from 22 August 1975 through 21 August 1978, and add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010188

    Original file (20100010188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded during a hostile action in Vietnam and he was awarded the ARCOM with "V" Device; however, it was not included on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge). His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002427

    Original file (20120002427.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 July 1968 through 20 April 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence concerning the Army Commendation Medal, i.e., the award certificate, was insufficient without corroborating orders to support...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001764

    Original file (20090001764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001764 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF includes orders that awarded the applicant the BSM with "V" Device, PH, and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 12 June 1969 through 13 November 1970; b. amending item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012147

    Original file (20140012147 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to show any evidence that he was awarded or authorized the AM, ARCOM for meritorious service (or meritorious achievement), or the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar. The applicant's military personnel records fail to reveal evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (1st Award). As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009457

    Original file (20080009457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating while serving in the RVN. Paragraph 4-7 contains guidance on qualifying periods and states, in pertinent part, that qualifying periods of must be continuous enlisted active Federal military service. The evidence of record is void of any indication that the applicant was...