Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005802
Original file (20140005802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  25 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005802 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the:

* Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device
* Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB)
* Purple Heart (PH)

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* his job in the Army was infantry and this should be sufficient evidence to award him the CIB
* his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision shows his shrapnel wound and this should be sufficient evidence for awarding him the PH

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3128, dated 10 July 1970
* VA Veterans Benefits Award Certificate
* VA Rating Decision and associated correspondence



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 May 1969 and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  Orders issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Lewis, awarded the applicant the following:

* Special Orders Number 262, dated 19 September 1969 – Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar
* Special Orders Number 263, dated 20 September 1969 – Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)

4.  On 6 January 1970, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being absent without leave on or about 4 January 1970 until on or about 5 January 1970.

5.  He served in Vietnam during the period on or about 11 January 1970 through 29 November 1970 where he participated in three campaigns while assigned to:

* Replacement Detachment, Company A, 7th Support Battalion, 199th Infantry Brigade, from 11 January 1970 to 18 January 1970
* Company A, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 199th Infantry Brigade, from 19 January 1970 to on or about 25 November 1970

6.  Headquarters, 199th Infantry Brigade, Special Orders Number 47, dated 16 February 1970, awarded the applicant the CIB.

7.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3070, dated 8 July 1970, awarded the applicant the ARCOM with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster for meritorious achievement during the period 7 January 1970 to 6 June 1970.

8.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3128, dated 10 July 1970, awarded the applicant the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroic action on 14 May 1970.

9.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3889, dated 22 August 1970, awarded the applicant the Air Medal (AM).

10.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 4090, dated 2 September 1970, awarded the applicant the ARCOM with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster for meritorious achievement during the period 6 June 1970 to 17 September 1970.

11.  Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 10464, dated 24 October 1970, awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period January 1970 to November 1970.

12.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any injuries or wounds.

13.  On 30 November 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)

14.  The applicant provided his DD Form 214 and general awards awarding him the ARCOM with "V" Device.  He also provided a copy of his VA Rating Decision and correspondence that shows he was awarded disability compensation, in part, for a service-connected disability as a result of residuals from a shell fragment wound to the right upper arm.

15.  His records show he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and are void of documentation showing he was awarded the AGCM.  There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded the applicant from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the AGCM.

16.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946, and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

17.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that:

	a.  The PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

	b.  A bronze service star is authorized for wear on the VSM for participation in each credited campaign.

18.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The PH requires evidence to verify:

* the wound was the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records

2.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, his VA Rating Decision is insufficient evidence to support award of the PH.

3.  Records show general orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM (4th Award) and "V" Device; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

4.  Special orders awarded him the CIB; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
5.  Records show the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60), Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these badges.

6.  He served honorably during the period 26 May 1969 through 30 November 1970.  Notwithstanding his Article 15, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service without a commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

7.  General orders awarded the applicant the AM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

8.  The applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the VSM with three bronze service stars.

9.  General orders awarded the unit to which he was assigned in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 26 May 1969 to 30 November 1970,

	b.  deleting award of the VSM from his DD Form 214, and
	c.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214:

* ARCOM with “V” Device (4th Award)
* AM
* AGCM
* VSM with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* CIB
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar 
(M-60)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the PH.



      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005802



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005802



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004097

    Original file (20140004097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows – * 1st Battalion, 505th Infantry, 3rd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 6 October 1968 to 11 November 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43 dated 1970 * 2nd Battalion, 3rd Infantry, 199th Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018326

    Original file (20140018326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Purple Heart (PH) * Air Medal (2nd Award) * Bronze Star Medal (3rd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (4th Award) with "V" Device * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star 2. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901

    Original file (20110015901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with “V” Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002919

    Original file (20090002919.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 25 February 1970 and that he was awarded the PH as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20 and by PH orders on file in his record. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received two awards of the ARCOM for meritorious achievement during two separate periods as evidenced by ARCOM award orders on file in his record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003238

    Original file (20120003238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and it be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His DD Form 214 shows the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Overseas Service Bar (two) * PH * BSM with "V" device 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020411

    Original file (20140020411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record is void of orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 4 August 1969 through 9 March 1971; and b. correcting his DD Form 214 by deleting the VSM and the BSM and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009726

    Original file (20080009726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 November 1969 through 3 November 1970. The evidence of record includes orders awarding the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 20 July 1970, and that awarded him the BSM for his meritorious service during the period November 1969 through November 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002427

    Original file (20120002427.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 July 1968 through 20 April 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence concerning the Army Commendation Medal, i.e., the award certificate, was insufficient without corroborating orders to support...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000619

    Original file (20080000619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 12 January 1970 through 6 December 1970. The applicant provides a PH Certificate which shows that on 20 July 1970, the 91st Evacuation Hospital awarded him the PH for wounds he received in action on 19 July 1970. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add his award of the PH to his record and separation document at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019340

    Original file (20080019340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award the applicant the PH for wounds sustained in action in the RVN on 13 May 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a...