Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002473
Original file (20120002473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002473 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 May 1992 to show an "X" in the "Yes" block instead of the "No" block.

2.  The applicant states he joined the Army on 26 November 1970 which was still under the Vietnam era.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 27 November 1970.  He was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 5 December 1972 at the expiration of his term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 2 years of total active service.

3.  On 11 June 1974, the applicant again enlisted in the RA.  He served through a series of reenlistments until he retired on 31 May 1992 for length of service.  Item 15a of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows an "X" in the "No" block.

4.  The Post-Vietnam VEAP was enacted by Congress to provide educational fund-matching to Armed Forces personnel after the Vietnam conflict.  To qualify, service members had to enter active duty between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears the applicant is mistaken in that item 15a has nothing to do with whether or not a Soldier served during the "Vietnam era."  It merely indicates whether or not a Soldier is eligible for VEAP benefits; the applicant was not eligible.

2.  The applicant was eligible for the Vietnam Era GI Bill (VEGIB) covering those who served on active duty after 31 January 1955 but before 1 January 1977.  Entitlements were 1 1/2 months of educational assistance for each month served on active duty, up to 45 months.  There was a 10-year delimiting date from the date of separation or 31 December 1989, whichever was earlier.  The program was terminated on 31 December 1989; however, members with remaining entitlement under the VEGIB after 31 December 1989 were automatically converted to the MGIB Program if certain criteria were met.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION
 

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002473



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002473



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001132

    Original file (20070001132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show “Yes” instead of “No;” and that item 17 (Member Was Provided Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior to Separation) be corrected to show “No” instead of “Yes.” 2. For any Soldier who enlisted after 1985, mark "NO"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017509

    Original file (20060017509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 2003, that shows he was honorably retired from active duty after completing a total of 20 years and 19 days active service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the “New GI Bill” (i.e., the MGIB) on 3 March 1997. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s retirement from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007428

    Original file (20100007428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the “Yes” block in Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educations Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 October 2002 be checked instead of the “No” block which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “Yes” block is marked in Item 15a. He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “No”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021296

    Original file (20100021296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 to show she contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). The box for "NO" is marked in item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era VEAP) of her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014645

    Original file (20080014645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014645 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show he served 35 years of service; that he contributed to the post-Vietnam era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP); and that he was retired for a service-connected physical disability, rated 50 percent disabled. The DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025072

    Original file (20100025072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his 31 July 1997 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct date of entry on active duty and total active service, all of his awards and military education, and entitlement to educational benefits. The applicant contends that his 31 July 1997 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 31 July 1975 [sic], he completed more than 22 years of total active service, all of his awards and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011984

    Original file (20080011984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214, with a separation date of 30 June 1999, be corrected to mark Item 15a, Member contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), as “Yes.” 2. Any Soldier entering the service between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985 was eligible to participate in the program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06617-01

    Original file (06617-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with applicable statutes, opinion attached. The program when he entered active duty (other than ember 1977 was the Veterans Educational Recommend in an educational education benefit entry onto active available to for training) Assistance Program to members who entered the military for the first time between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985. enrollments on 30 June 1985, 28 October 1986 to 31 March 1987. before these deadlines lost their eligibility. b. states he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606474C070209

    Original file (9606474C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 15a, “Member contributed to post-Vietnam era veteran’s educational assistance program”, be corrected from “No” to “Yes.” 3. The applicant's financial records show that he contributed to a VEAP account. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned, item 15a, “Member contributed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008529

    Original file (20080008529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show he contributed to the Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). Therefore, considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for correction of Item 15a of his DD Form 214. While the Board does not dispute the fact that the applicant was told that his discharge document contained an error...