IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 January 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002377
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be adjusted from June 2009 to 1 December 2005. He also requests that his break in service indicated on his military records during his transition from active duty to the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) be deleted.
2. He states:
a. according to his CAARNG records, his DOR for CPT was June 2009, but his actual DOR for CPT is December 2005.
b. he was promoted while serving on active duty. He resigned his commission in May 2008 after meeting with a recruiter to ensure his immediate assimilation into the CAARNG.
c. he received a break in service in his record due to untimely action by the CAARNG Accession Task Force. However, during this time period, he was attending drills and performing staff duties for 1st Battalion, 160th Infantry Regiment.
d. he signed an Oath of Office and an Officer Affiliation Agreement on 7 May 2008. However, his gaining unit didn't know who he was and he was directed to see a first lieutenant in the Accession Task Force. For six months, he continued to work with the Accession Task Force by sending emails and leaving phone messages. He was later informed that the quickest way to get him in the ARNG was via a Federal Recognition Board, a process which took the Accession Task Force an additional four months.
e. he sought to transfer to the 1st Battalion, 160th Infantry Regiment in September 2008 and he began attending drills with this unit in October 2008.
3. He provides no additional documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is currently serving in the CAARNG in the rank of CPT.
2. After having prior service in the U.S. Navy Reserve, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 March 2002. He was honorably discharged on 5 September 2002 to accept a commission in the Army.
3. He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 6 September 2002 in the rank of second lieutenant. He was ordered to active duty on 8 September 2002.
4. He was promoted to first lieutenant on 7 March 2005 and to CPT on 1 December 2005.
5. He executed an Oath of Office on 7 May 2008 as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of CPT.
6. He was honorably discharged on 31 May 2008 in the rank of CPT and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Battalion, 18th Cavalry Regiment. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for this period indicates the effective date of pay grade as 1 December 2005.
7. In a memorandum, dated 1 June 2008, he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of CPT, effective 1 June 2008.
8. On 15 May 2009, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the CAARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition. The board found that the applicant was qualified for appointment in the ARNG as a CPT. He was extended temporary Federal recognition in accordance with the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions).
9. On 15 May 2009, he executed an Oaths of Office for appointment in the CAARNG in the rank of CPT. His service record does not indicate he was granted permanent Federal recognition for this appointment.
10. His ARNG Retirement Points History Statement, dated 14 June 2011, shows he had 8 years, 3 months, and 3 days creditable service for retired pay at age 60 and 2,683 total points creditable. The following retirement years indicate unaccounted status:
* 25 May 1991 through 5 March 2002
* 6 September 2002 through 7 September 2002
* 1 June 2008 through 14 May 2009
11. On 15 June 2010, the Adjutant General, State of California, issued a memorandum appointing him in the CAARNG, effective 15 May 2009, in the rank of CPT.
12. During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Acting Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau (NGB) who stated:
a. the applicant was promoted to CPT/O-3 while serving on active duty with a DOR of 1 December 2005, which should be accounted for when calculating his DOR. Additionally, the identified break in service from active duty to the ARNG was a direct result of administrative errors by the CAARNG. It is recommended that the CAARNG correct this matter as it is supported by the DA Form 71 (Oath of Office) which the applicant signed on 7 May 2008.
b. although the applicant's accession in the CAARNG didn't take place for nearly a year after he signed his DA Form 71, he served the CAARNG through drill weekends, annual training, and various training. This office recommended the applicant receive all back pay and allowances for the dates he served and was not paid by the CAARNG.
c. the applicant prepared for his transition from the active duty to the Reserves in 2008 when he signed a DA Form 71 as a Reserve commissioned officer while he was at Fort Jackson, SC. Additionally, a U.S. Army Human Resources Command memorandum, dated 1 June 2008, appointed the applicant as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army under Title 10, U.S. Code 12201 and 12203. The effective date for this action was 1 June 2008.
d. the applicant, even though not officially a part of the CAARNG at the time, requested a transfer from the 1st Battalion, 18th Cavalry and it was approved. The applicant transferred into Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 160th Infantry Regiment. The Operations Officer for the unit stated "He (the applicant) attended and completed scheduled Individual Training (IDT) periods from October 2008 to May 2009 without being officially 'carried on the books.' The issue with the transfer was due to the Accession Task Force's SOPs (standing operating procedures) for transfer."
e. the applicant performed "special duty" for the Battalion Commander during periods between 4 October 2008 and 3 May 2009.
f. the NGB recommends approval of the applicant's request and the State concurs with this recommendation.
13. A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant to allow him to provide comments. However, he didn't respond within the allotted timeframe.
14. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 10-15b, states that temporary Federal recognition may be granted by a Federal recognition board to an eligible member when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a Federally-recognized unit of the ARNG. The Federal recognition board will forward the NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) and allied documents to The Adjutant General. When the member is favorably recommended, The Adjutant General will endorse the packet to NGB. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB, extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.
15. Army Regulation 140-185 (Training and Retirement Point Credits and Unit Level Strength Accounting Records) prescribes the types of training and activities retirement points are authorized. Paragraph 2-1 covers the criteria for crediting retirement points and states the limitations on the number of points which may be credited to a Soldier during a retirement year are as follows:
a. A maximum of 365 points (366 during leap year).
b. A maximum of 60 points for inactive duty training (IDT) and membership. However, an Annual or Terminal Statement of Retirement Points will report all points earned.
c. Partial year - If a Soldier is separated or removed from an active status during a retirement year, the Soldier may be credited with a proportionate number of IDT points for that year as shown in appendix A. Appendix B shows the minimum number of points required for a partial year for qualifying service. Appendix C shows the number of membership points authorized for a partial year.
d. Membership - 15 points for each year in an active status. If the Soldier is on active duty for more than 350 days (351 days in a leap year) membership points will be reduced so the maximum 365 points are not exceeded (366 in a leap year).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends his CAARNG records indicate his DOR to CPT was June 2009, but it's actually 1 December 2005.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was initially appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 6 September 2002. He served on active duty from 8 September 2002 through 31 May 2008. While on active duty, he was promoted to CPT with an effective date and DOR of 1 December 2005.
3. He executed an Oath of Office on 7 May 2008 as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of CPT.
4. He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 1 June 2008 in the rank of CPT.
5. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a CPT in the CAARNG on 15 May 2009. He should have been granted Federal recognition as a CPT with an effective date and DOR of 1 December 2005. However, his service record is void of orders which show he was granted permanent Federal recognition at that time.
6. The NGB advisory opinion states:
a. the applicant's break in service from active duty to the ARNG was a direct result of administrative errors by the CAARNG;
b. the applicant served the CAARNG through drill weekends, annual training, and various training;
c. the applicant prepared for his transition from active duty to the Reserves in 2008 when he signed a DA Form 71 as a Reserve commissioned officer while he was at Fort Jackson, SC;
d. the applicant attended and completed scheduled IDT periods from October 2008 to May 2009 without being officially "carried on the books"; and
e. the applicant performed "special duty" for the Battalion Commander during periods between 4 October 2008 and 3 May 2009.
7. Based on the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he was granted Federal recognition as a CPT in the CAARNG, effective 1 December 2005.
8. A review of the applicant's ARNG Retirement Points History Statement revealed he was not credited with any retirement points during the period 1 June 2008 through 14 May 2009.
9. The evidence of record shows the applicant did not have a break in service from the date he was released from active duty on 31 May 2008 to the date he was appointed in the CAARNG on 15 May 2009. Therefore, his ARNG Retirement Points History Statement should be updated to include his retirement points for the period 1 June 2008 through 14 May 2009.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all the State ARNG and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. issuing him orders to show he was granted Federal recognition for appointment as a CPT in the CAARNG, effective 1 June 2008 with a CPT DOR of 1 December 2005;
b. updating his ARNG Retirement Points History Statement to include his retirement points for the period 1 June 2008 through 14 May 2009; and
c. paying him any pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002377
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002377
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010152
On 20 August 2004, the CAARNG published State Orders 233-1101 appointing him in the ARNG in the rank of CPT as an SP officer, effective 18 August 2004. Discussion: [Applicant] believes he should have received a promotion date effective 2 February 2009 because of the 4-year delay in correcting and processing his DA Form 5074-1-R for creditable service in a required grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011249
The applicant provides: a. Undated Memorandum, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center [now known as Army Human Resources Command (AHRC)], St Louis, Missouri (MO), Appointment as a USAR Officer; b. DA Form 71 (Oath of Office), dated 17 January 1988, as a 1LT in the USAR; c. Oath of Office, dated 18 July 1988, California Army National Guard (CAARNG); d. DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 14 April 1989, Completion of the CH Officer Basic Course; e. DA Form 67-8 (U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013480
The applicant requests his Federal Recognition (FEDREC) date and date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) (pay grade O-3) be corrected to 13 September 2012. The applicant provides copies of: * California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Orders 97-1045 showing he was transferred to a Plans Officer position in the 40th Brigade Support Battalion (BSB) * CAARNG Orders 103-1060 showing he was ordered to Active Guard Reserve Duty as a Plans Officer effective 15 April 2012 * CAARNG Orders 258-1013 showing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019854
The applicant states: * She was accessed into the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) in October 2008 * She was told that she would have two years to complete the Chaplain Basic Officer Leader Course (CH-BOLC) and that upon completion, she would be promoted to CPT; she completed the CH-BOLC in October 2010 * She has tried unsuccessfully to resolve this issue through her chain of command and has repeatedly submitted the necessary paperwork * Her efforts were made harder when she deployed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002411
On 12 June 2008, the Board adjudicated his case and granted him partial relief in that it recommended: * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 2LT to 29 May 1998 * adjusting his DOR and effective date to 1LT to 29 May 2000 * forwarding his records before an SSB for promotion consideration to CPT under the 2004 criteria 13. Nevertheless, the Board corrected his records and adjusted his DOR and effective date of appointment to 2LT as well as promotion to 1LT. He was neither eligible for,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004900
c. A copy of a DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)), dated 20 July 2005. d. A copy of her DA Form 71 (Oath of Office-Military Personnel), dated 13 March 2006. e. An NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 13 March 2006. f. Orders 126-700, issued by the Joint Forces Headquarters, WIARNG, on 6 May 2006. g. An NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 14 June 2005. h. Copies of NGB Special Orders Number 127 AR, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008644
In or around April 2009, his promotion packet went before a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) and shortly thereafter he was recommended for promotion by the Chief of Chaplains. The applicant provides: * Memorandum from the Chief of Chaplains * Orders 155-63 (State promotion to CPT) * Appointment memorandum * Email * NGB Special Orders Number 62 AR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016083
Since she had 14 years of service and only needed 2 years of time in grade (TIG), she should have been promoted to CPT by the April 2009 Federal Recognition Board (FRB). National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition. Had the applicant's initial Federal recognition date been timely, she would have been promoted to CPT effective 25 March 2009.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022918
The applicant provides: * two NGB Forms 89 * two appointment orders * two NGB Forms 337 (Oaths of Office) * NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States) * NGB Special Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 July 2012, the applicant completed an NGB Form 62E requesting Federal recognition as a CPT with appointment as a Reserve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002177
He requests correction of his initial appointment date in the District of Columbia Army National Guard (DCARNG), as stated on his Federal recognition orders (enclosure 22), published in October 2008, which will impact the following four areas: (1) correct his credit for time-in-grade from 1 year to 2 years based upon regulations and correction of initial appointment date (enclosure 2); (2) either rescind the revocation of his appointment or change the revocation of his appointment to 30 June...