IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 August 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002153
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect:
a. his rank be changed to sergeant/E-5; and
b. award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states, in effect:
* he was an E-5 when he was wounded in Vietnam
* the company commander did not input the proper rank or his award of the Purple Heart
* he could not contest it because he was hospitalized for 15 years
3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on
19 September 1967. He served as a light weapons infantryman in Vietnam from 28 May 1968 until he was wounded on 3 October 1968 and transferred to the United Sates on 23 October 1968 for further medical treatment. He was released from active duty on 10 April 1969 in the rank of private first class (PFC) and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) the following day. He was removed from the TDRL on 30 November 1972 in the rank of PFC and permanently retired with a 40% disability rating.
3. Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the entry "PFC (P)" (permanent). Item 5b (Pay Grade) shows the entry "E-3." Item 6 shows the entry "8 Jun 68" (8 June 1968). His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
4. Orders, dated 8 June 1968, show he was promoted to PFC.
5. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows he was appointed to the permanent grade of PFC effective 8 June 1968.
6. There is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a permanent recommended promotion prior to his placement on the TDRL.
7. A Vietnam Casualty Report, dated 5 October 1968, states the applicant was on bunker guard and his weapon accidentally discharged and injured him in the right ankle.
8. There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the available records.
9. Item 20 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank.
10. His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.
11. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart.
12. Paragraph 5-5 of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states to standardize promotion qualification throughout the Army Reserve and to ensure promotion of the best qualified Soldiers, recommendation by a promotion selection board and placement on a permanent recommended promotion list is required for all promotions to sergeant and staff sergeant.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. His contention he was an E-5 when he was wounded in Vietnam was noted. However, since there is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a permanent recommended promotion list prior to his placement on the TDRL on 11 April 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request to change his rank to E-5.
2. The applicant contends he was wounded in Vietnam and is entitled to the Purple Heart. However, evidence shows he was injured on 3 October 1968 in Vietnam when his weapon accidentally discharged and struck him in his right ankle, not as a result of hostile action.
3. Army Regulation 600-8-22 establishes basic requirements for the Purple Heart and all other awards. The Purple Heart requires:
* a wound the result of hostile action
* treatment of the wound by military medical personnel
* documentation of the wound in official records
4. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X ___ ___X____ ___X ___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002153
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120002153
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005581
A 17 February 1969 medical board report relates, "The patient stated that while on security duty and jumping a small canal, the patient's own weapon discharged, striking him in the left foot while on active duty in the Republic of Viet Nam ." The Purple Heart Certificate submitted by the applicant indicates that the Commanding Officer, 29th Evacuation Hospital made the award on 5 September 1968. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003704
It also shows in: * Items 5a and 5b - PFC(P) and E-3 respectively * Item 6 (Date of Rank) - 21 September 1967 * Item 24 - the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Item 30 (Remarks) - continuation of item 5a, PFC/E-3 (Permanent), date of appointment and date of rank 21 September 1967 15. After he was wounded, the applicant was reassigned from Vietnam in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011149
The applicant states he was an infantryman serving in Vietnam when he was wounded on 10 November 1967. The applicant's record contains no orders showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge; however, the record shows he was an infantryman assigned to an infantry company, and he was wounded while engaged in combat. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014126
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Republic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015522
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart; the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 February 1967 to 1 July 1969; the Vietnam Service Medal, with two bronze service stars; the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009646
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the FSM was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon system in Vietnam and later received treatment for this injury. The FSM's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014252
The applicant's military records do not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not in question, regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient basis upon which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016572
Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was wounded on 17 January 1968. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel record which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to award the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711238
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: A 24 March 1969 clinical record prepared at the Fitzsimons General Hospital in Denver shows that the applicant suffered bilateral open humeral fractures secondary to a truck accident while driving in the Republic of Vietnam on 13 March 1969. On 1 August 1989 a medical evaluation board (MEB) indicated that he had various injuries, sustained in a truck accident while driving on 13 March 1969, and was medically unfit for further...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314
Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...