IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 January 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009646
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests her deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states her brother was wounded near Dak To in Vietnam on 5 June 1968. He sustained a gunshot wound to his right hand by his M-79 grenade launcher which accidentally discharged while on duty. His injury is shown as in line of duty and he was ultimately processed for disability. He passed away in July 1994 and she feels although his wound was caused by an accident, it was still in line of duty and should entitle him to the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides
* Her certificate of live birth
* FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* FSM's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* FSM's Clinical records
* FSM's enlistment contract
* FSM's death certificate
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The FSM's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 October 1966 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3. He served in Vietnam from 3 December 1967 to 5 July 1968. He was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment.
4. On 5 June 1968, he was carrying his M-79 weapon system, loaded with a canister round. As he was using the weapon as a crutch, he had his right hand over the end of the barrel. The weapon discharged when the butt struck the ground, striking his right hand. He sustained extensive nerve, muscle, and bone injuries.
5. Following extensive surgery and evaluation, his conditions were ultimately considered by a physical evaluation board (PEB). The PEB determined the loss of his right hand and other paralysis rendered him unfit and recommended his permanent retirement by reason of disability. He concurred.
6. He retired from active duty by reason of disability on 22 March 1972 and he was placed on the Retired List in his retired rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 on 23 March 1972. His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
7. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Nothing in several typical sources shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.
8. His available medical records reflect an accidental injury. None of the available medical documents show this injury was caused by the enemy. His separation physical does not mention a combat injury.
9. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 shows he was wounded on 5 June 1968 (gunshot wound to the right hand) with the entry not as a result of enemy action.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record:
a. Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows: injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action; injury caused by enemy placed mine or trap; injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent; injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire; and/or concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy generated explosions.
b. Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows: frostbite or trench foot injuries; heat stroke; food poisoning not caused by enemy agents; chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by the enemy; battle fatigue; disease not directly caused by enemy agents; accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action; self-inflicted wounds, except when in the heat of battle and not involving gross negligence; post-traumatic stress disorders; and/or jump injuries not caused by enemy action.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather he or she is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria. When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that the applicant was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not the sole justification for the award.
2. The criteria for an award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
3. In this case, the evidence of record shows the FSM was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon system in Vietnam and later received treatment for this injury. However, his injury was clearly accidental. Nowhere in the available treatment records does it show the injury was a result of hostile action (i.e., that there was incoming enemy rounds that caused the discharge).
4. The FSM's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action. His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing. There is nothing in multiple typical sources that confirm he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he required treatment by medical personnel.
5. There appears to be an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting her requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices the FSM made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of the FSM's service in arms.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140009646
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140009646
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021321
The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show awards of the: * Purple Heart * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * any and all awards as a result of his service in Vietnam 2. The evidence of record shows the FSM was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows the FSM sustained wounds or injuries as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000163
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an accidental discharge of a weapon by another Soldier and he later received treatment for this injury.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015548
There is nothing in four typical documents showing he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster * A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011247
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026181
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, two overseas service bars, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010817
His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not document any combat wounds, and there is no other evidence in his service records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018582
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Item 40 (Wounds) of his contemporaneous DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury. However, nowhere does it show his medical transfer was a result of a combat injury that was caused by the enemy.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014233
The applicant states that the FSM should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he suffered during war service and the subsequent deformity of his leg. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows the FSM was wounded or injured as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012019
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional official documentary evidence to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014691
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing * Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human...