Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002135
Original file (20120002135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  21 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120002135 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Legion of Merit (LOM) and the Korean Service Medal, interpreted to mean the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM).

2.  The applicant states these two medals were omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214
* Permanent Orders 32-1, dated 31 August 1987, awarding him the LOM
* Certificate for award of the LOM, dated 31 August 1987

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 13 July 1962, the applicant entered the Regular Army as a 2nd lieutenant, Ordnance Corps.

3.  The applicant served in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from August 1964 to August 1965.

4.  The applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 5 September 1968 to 30 August 1969.

	a.  He served as the Executive Officer, 336th Ordnance Battalion from 
5 September 1968 to 6 March 1969.

	b.  He served as the Ammunition Supply Officer, Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, Support Command (HHD, USASUPCOM) from 
7 March to 24 August 1969.

5.  On 31 August 1987, the applicant retired due to length of service.  He had attained the rank of colonel, pay grade O-6, and had completed 27 years, 
1 month, and 18 days of creditable active duty service.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his decorations, medals, badges, citations and campaign ribbons as:

* Bronze Star Medal
* Defense Meritorious Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster)
* Meritorious Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster)
* Joint Service Commendation Medal
* Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster)
* Meritorious Unit Commendation (1st Oak Leaf Cluster)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon (2)
* RVN Campaign Medal
* RVN Cross of Gallantry with Palm Unit Citation
* Overseas Service Bars (2)

7.  The applicant's records contain Permanent Orders 32-1, Fort Lee, VA, dated 31 August 1987, announcing award of the LOM to the applicant for meritorious service during the period from 1 June 1978 to 31 August 1987.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards):

	a.  The KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the ROK from 28 July 1954 through a future date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.

	b.  Appendix B of this regulation shows that based on the applicant's dates of service in the RVN, he participated in the following four campaign periods: the Vietnam Counteroffensive; Phase V; the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VI; the Tet 69 Counteroffensive; and the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

9.  DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows in item 23 (Qualification in Arms) that he had qualified as a marksman with the M-1 rifle, pistol, and carbine.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Permanent orders clearly show that the applicant was awarded the LOM for meritorious service.  Therefore, this decoration should be shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  Records show the applicant served during a qualifying period in the ROK for award of the KDSM.  Therefore, this service medal should be shown on his 
DD Form 214.

3.  Records show that the applicant participated in four campaign periods during his service in the RVN.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  Records show the applicant qualified as a marksman with the M-1 rifle, pistol, and carbine.  Therefore his records should be corrected to show award of the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol, and Carbine Bars.








BOARD VOTE:

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 and

	b.  adding the following awards to his DD Form 214:

* Legion of Merit
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Korea Defense Service Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol, and Carbine Bars



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002135





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120002135



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006676

    Original file (20120006676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). An AGPZ Form 738 (Record of Army Decorations Board Action), dated 3 December 1970, shows he was recommended for award of the MSM for the period from 8 July 1968 to 8 February 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000644

    Original file (20080000644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Letter, dated 12 December 2007; DD Form 214; Department of the Army (DA) PUC General Orders (GO) Number (#) 25, dated 8 June 2001 and GO # 75, dated 2 December 1969; Officer Qualification Record (DA Form 66); and Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division Special Orders (SO) # 32, dated 1 February 1968. However, the evidence of record confirms his entitlement to one award of the PUC based on his service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005372

    Original file (20110005372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24A (Service Record), covering the period of service from 7 December 1948 through 16 October 1951, shows in: a. section 7 (Combat Record): Chinese Communist Forces (CCF) Intervention, First United Nations (UN) Counteroffensive, and CCF Spring Offensive campaigns; b. section 9 (Remarks - Administrative): he was discharged on 16 October 1951, his character and efficiency were both rated as "excellent," and he had 34 months and 10 days of continuous service credit toward...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002384

    Original file (20080002384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 July 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002384 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Military Personnel Record Jacket (MPRJ) contains a DD Form 214 dated 30 June 1958. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 31 July 1977 DD Form 214 as follows: a. deleting the current entry in Item 26 and replacing it with the entry "National Defense Service Medal;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015141

    Original file (20140015141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), reviewed on 28 April 1986, shows in – * item 5 (Oversea Service) the country where he served, period of overseas service, and if credit for NTC was granted, as follows – Country Period (From – Through) NTC Not Entered 15 Months Prior to 1 January 1960 No Entry Germany 17 March 1960 – 29 February 1964 Yes RVN 21 May 1967 – 13 May 1968 Yes Germany 21 June 1968 – 31 March 1970 No RVN 1 April 1970 – 29 March 1971 Yes Germany 30 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009527

    Original file (20120009527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Glider Badge * Parachutist Badge * Lapel Button 2. There is no DD Form 214 in the applicant's available service records covering active duty service in the ROK. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 June 1972 to add: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020836

    Original file (20120020836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) but was never awarded the PH. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the PH for wounds received in action on 30 September 1968; b. deleting the VSM with five campaign stars from his DD Form 214 for the period ending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102667C070208

    Original file (2004102667C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his final separation document (DD Form 214), dated 20 January 1970, be corrected to reflect 1 year and 7 months of Vietnam service in Item 22c (Foreign and or Sea Service) and by including all his authorized awards in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized). Item 24 shows that during the period of active duty service documented by the DD Form 214, the applicant earned only the NDSM 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005015

    Original file (20140005015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005015 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows: a. GOs awarded the applicant the – * PH * ARCOM (2nd OLC) b. the applicant qualified for award of the – * NDSM * KDSM * RVNCM with Device (1960) c. the applicant also qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008319

    Original file (20060008319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. These orders awarded the applicant the PH, for wounds he received while engaged in hostile combat action near Haktong-ni, Korea on 1 December 1952. The evidence of record confirms he was wounded in action in Korea on 1 December 1952 and again on 13 June 1953.