Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001825
Original file (20120001825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001825 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) code be changed to a code that will allow him to reenter the military. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge and RE code are unjust because he was discharged for one incident.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his administrative discharge proceedings, and a letter of support from the commander who initiated separation proceedings against him.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 January 2007 for a period of 5 years and 17 weeks, training as a cannon crewman, and a $24,000 enlistment bonus.  He completed his one-station unit training as a cannon crewman at Fort Sill, Oklahoma and was transferred to Baumholder, Germany.

2.  He deployed to Iraq on 1 April 2008 and was advanced to the pay grade of 
E-4 on 1 January 2009.  He departed Iraq on 22 May 2009 and returned to Germany.

3.  On 12 August 2010, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for the wrongful use of a controlled substance, marijuana.

4.  On 1 October 2010, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs.  He also advised the applicant that he intended to recommend that he be retained in service.  The recommendation for discharge noted the applicant had wrongfully used marijuana on two occasions, between 8 November and 
7 December 2009 and between 7 December 2009 and 5 January 2010.

5.  After consulting with counsel the applicant elected to submit a statement in his own behalf; however, that statement is not present in the available records. 

6.  The battalion commander recommended that the applicant’s discharge be approved but suspended for a period of 12 months.

7.  However, on 26 October 2010, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge with service characterized as under honorable conditions.

8.  Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 15 November 2010 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct.  His service was characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and he was assigned a separation code of “JKK” and an RE code of “4.”  He had completed 
3 years, 9 months and 15 days of active service.

9.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 provides that a separation code of “JKK” will be assigned to enlisted personnel separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), due to misconduct.  An RE code of “4” is assigned when a separation code of "JKK" is used.  

11.  An RE code "4" indicates that a person is not qualified for continued Army service by virtue of being separated from the service with a nonwaivable disqualification such as commission of serious offenses, which includes the abuse of illegal drugs.



 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.  His separation packet also shows he had two incidents of drug use.

2.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation        635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct due to abuse of illegal drugs and was properly assigned a separation code of “JKK” and an RE code of “4” in accordance with the applicable regulations.

3.  Inasmuch as the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the RE code was assigned in error or unjust there appears to be no basis to grant his request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001825



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001825



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008401

    Original file (20090008401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides that a separation code of “JKK” will be issued to enlisted personnel separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), due to misconduct. As the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct due to abuse of illegal drugs he was properly issued a separation code of “JKK” and an RE code of 4 in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001498

    Original file (20110001498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The record confirms the applicant was separated by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) based on his wrongful use of cocaine. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the separation process, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000276

    Original file (AR20120000276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4".

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008673

    Original file (AR20130008673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 17 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), for having wrongfully used a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 10 May 2010, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004348

    Original file (20120004348.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated he was recommending the applicant be given a general discharge, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with an SPD of JKK, RE code of 4, and a general discharge. It appears the separation authority took the applicant's complete military record into consideration when he directed the applicant received a general discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013119

    Original file (AR20130013119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. The evidence shows that on 28 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, specifically for wrongfully using marijuana (120310-120409) and (120318-120417). On...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020184

    Original file (20120020184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 2010, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. Accordingly, the ADRB voted to grant him relief in the form of upgrading his discharge to a fully honorable discharge and changing the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016577

    Original file (AR20130016577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record shows that on 10 July 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for illegal drug abuse, specifically for wrongfully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013729

    Original file (20130013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 March 2010, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2), for misconduct–abuse of illegal drugs. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The RE code on the applicant's DD Form 214 was assigned...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006970

    Original file (AR20090006970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse),...