Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001568
Original file (20120001568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001568 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 3 (Social Security Number (SSN)) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 4 August 1969, to show the sixth digit as "XXX-XX-2XXX" instead of "XXX-XX-3XXX."

2.  The applicant states the SSN currently shown on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* DD Form 214, dated 4 August 1969
* DD Form 214, dated 24 April 1967
* Veterans Universal Access Identification Card
* Medicare Health Insurance Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 April 1966.  His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract) shows he enlisted using an assigned Army Service Number (ASN).  

3.  His records show he continued to serve in the Army using his ASN until he was honorably discharged on 24 April 1967, to accept a commission as a Reserve commissioned officer.  The DD Form 214 he received for this period of service shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-2XXX."

4.  The applicant accepted an appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant and he was ordered to active duty, effective 25 April 1967.  

5.  After completing 2 years, 3 months, and 10 days of net active service this period, he was released from active duty on 4 August 1969, at the expiration of his active duty commitment.  Item 3 on the DD Form 214 he received for this period of service shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-3XXX."

6.  The applicant copies of his DD Form 214, dated 24 April 1967, Veterans Universal Access Identification Cards, and Medicare Health Insurance Card showing "XXX-XX-2XXX" as his SSN.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears that an error was made during the preparation of the applicant’s
DD Form 214, dated 4 August 1969, which resulted in the incorrect SSN being reflected.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-2XXX."  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to show his correct SSN.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 3 on his DD Form 214, dated 4 August 1969, to show the SSN as it is listed in item 3 on his DD Form 214, dated 24 April 1967.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001568





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001568



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007865

    Original file (20130007865.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant provided the SSN he claims is correct during his induction processing. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct item 3 of his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as shown on his DA Form 398. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002115

    Original file (20140002115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's record contains documents showing he used the SSN that is listed on his Social Security Card during his period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001626

    Original file (20120001626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains several orders from this period of service that only show his SN and not his SSN. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant's SSN was listed as "xxx-xx-3xxx" throughout his military service. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 October 1965 to show his correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018903

    Original file (20140018903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains: * a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personnel History), dated 16 January 1967, which shows his SSN as XXX-XX-XX97 * a DA Form 2376 (Notification to State Adjutants General Release from Active Duty of Obligated Reservist), dated 9 December 1968, which shows his SSN as XXX-XX-XX97 4. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140018903 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010966

    Original file (20120010966.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no documents in his available record, other than the DD Form 214, that show his SSN as xxx-xx-3xxx. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's record contains a DA Form 41 that was prepared immediately after his induction at shows the same SSN as it appears on his Social Security card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004461

    Original file (20120004461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), dated 14 August 1967, showing his SSN as "XXX-XX-2336." His DD Form 214 shows his SSN as "XXX-XX-2336." Therefore, the evidence is sufficient to correct his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as "XXX-XX-2636."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002636

    Original file (20130002636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Social Security Number (SSN) to show his SSN as "xxx-xx-2xxx" instead of "xxx-xx-3xxx." A review of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) shows that all documents containing an SSN, either typed or handwritten, show the SSN of "xxx-xx-3xxx."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140010325

    Original file (AR20140010325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documents in his record showing the SSN XXX-X8-XXXX include: * a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) completed by the applicant prior to induction * a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) 4. When the applicant entered active duty, Soldiers were identified by an ASN. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The SSN the applicant claims is correct was recorded in his military records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022686

    Original file (20110022686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows upon application for entry in the U.S. Armed Forces, the applicant reported his correct SSN and POB. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN and POB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024048

    Original file (20110024048.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains, in part: * DD Forms 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 10 January 1957 and 7 May 1964, that do not list his SSN * DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data) signed by the applicant and last reviewed on 1 December 1966, that shows the entry "XXX-XX-3XX1" in Item 9 (SSN) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) that shows the entry "XXX-XX-3XX1" as his SSN * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that does not list his SSN 6. The evidence of record shows...