Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001510
Original file (20120001510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001510 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be issued a Reentry (RE) Code.

2.  The applicant states that he does not have a RE Code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 17 August 2006 for a period of 8 years, assignment to an aviation maintenance unit in Fort Worth, Texas, training as an automated logistical specialist, and a $9,000 enlistment bonus. 
3.  He was ordered to active duty training on 28 June 2007.  He completed his basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and his advanced individual training at Fort Lee, Virginia before being released from active duty training on 26 November 2007 due to completion of required active service.  He had served 4 months and 29 days of active service and his service was uncharacterized.  He was not issued an RE Code.   

4.  He was returned to his USAR unit in Fort Worth and on 16 October 2008 he was discharged from the USAR under honorable conditions.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that RE Codes will not be issued for Reserve Component personnel unless they are being discharged for cause. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should have been issued an RE Code has been noted and found to lack merit. 

2.  The applicant was a Reserve Component Soldier who was being released from active duty training.  Accordingly, he was not authorized to be issued an RE Code for that period of service.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that an error or injustice exists in his case, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001510





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001510



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012934

    Original file (20090012934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect a Separation Code in block 26 and a Reentry (RE) Code in block 27. The applicant’s DD Form 214 issued at the time of his relief from active duty training (ADT) based on his self-terminating orders reflects the entries “NA” in blocks 26 and 27 under Separation Code and Reentry Code. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004468

    Original file (20140004468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the: * Army Service Ribbon * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024688

    Original file (20110024688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his home of record (HOR) as Fort Worth, TX instead of Denver, CO. 2. There is no authority to change the HOR as officially recorded at time of entry into the military service. The applicant's HOR appears not to be in error on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 September 1976.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009671

    Original file (20110009671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her separation document lacks the appropriate separation and RE codes for an honorably discharged Soldier. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training and is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. The evidence of record shows she was a USAR Soldier who was separated from active duty, upon completion of AIT by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004170

    Original file (20090004170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was assigned to the Retired Reserve on 28 July "2008" with 20 or more years of creditable service. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) provides policy for the granting of retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers. Under this law, a Reserve Soldier must complete a minimum of 20 qualifying years of service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024458

    Original file (20100024458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable. The applicant requests her USAR discharge status be changed from uncharacterized to honorable because she will receive a civilian position based on an honorable discharge. However, her record contains orders that show she was discharged from the USAR on 27 May 1996 with an uncharacterized discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004946

    Original file (20120004946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * Item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty) from "63BOO Locomotive Repairman 8 months" to "95B Military Police" * Item 27 (Reenlistment (RE) Code) from RE-3/3C to a more favorable code 2. LBK is used when the member has completed their required service but is ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment. At the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019015

    Original file (20120019015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Paragraph 3-28b states senior enlisted promotions result when data is provided to the promotion authority that reflects requirements based on current and projected position vacancies; the promotion authority announces the convening date of the selection board, location and description of current and projected position vacancies, zones of consideration for promotion selection, and administrative instructions; personnel records of Soldiers within the zone of consideration are reviewed by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016870

    Original file (20100016870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016870 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, removal of the code contained in her record that is hindering her from enlisting in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). She received a reentry eligibility (RE) code 3 and a separation program designator (SPD) code LDG (which means separation for parenthood).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000665

    Original file (20110000665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 4 January 1974, the date he completed his active duty service. At the time the applicant completed his active duty service obligation he was honorably REFRAD as shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 January 1974. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.