Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001124
Original file (20120001124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  17 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001124 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Infantry Shoulder Cord and that it be added to his records.

2.  The applicant states that his records should show that he served in the Infantry and he desires to be awarded the Infantry Shoulder Cord and to have it recorded in his records. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and copies of documents from the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 October 1958, for a period of 3 years and training as a lineman.  He completed basic training at Fort Carson, Colorado and advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Gordon, Georgia.  He was transferred to a signal company at Fort Sam Houston, Texas for his first and only duty assignment.  On 25 August 1961, he was awarded the primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) of a recreational specialist.

3.  On 21 February 1962, he was released from active duty under honorable conditions at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  He had served 3 years, 2 months, and 28 days of active service and had 25 days of lost time due to being absent without leave and in confinement.  His DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded marksmanship badges for three weapons. 

4.  A review of his official records failed to show any indication of the applicant ever having been awarded the PMOS of an infantryman, having completed infantry AIT, or being assigned to an infantry unit. 

5.  Army Regulation 670-1(Uniforms and Insignia) governs the requirements for award and wear of the Infantry Shoulder Cord.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the Commanding General of the U.S. Army Infantry Center authorizes the award of the Infantry Shoulder Cord to infantrymen who have completed the appropriate training.  The Infantry Shoulder Cord is a distinctive uniform item authorized only for infantry personnel.  There are no provisions for entering the Infantry Shoulder Cord on the DD Form 214 as it is an item of uniform wear and not an award or decoration.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Infantry Shoulder Cord has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s official records to show that he was ever trained as an infantryman or that he was awarded the PMOS of an infantryman.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to authorize him the issuance of the Infantry Shoulder Cord or to add it to his records.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001124





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001124



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000341

    Original file (20110000341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * two DD Forms 214, for the period ending 22 November 1960 and 22 November 1966 * a DD Form 735 (Health Record - Abstract of Service) * a medical form entitled (Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment, Treating Organization) with entries dated 27 January 1959, 10 April 1959, and 8 August 1959 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000172

    Original file (20130000172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010064

    Original file (20120010064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019272

    Original file (20080019272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. a copy of a VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim); b. a copy of Special Order Number 151, Headquarters, The United States Army Medical Training Center (USAMTC), Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 18 July 1969, assigning him to the US Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, CA, not later than 19 August 1969, for transfer to Vietnam; and c. a copy of an Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs Form 200. The record shows the applicant never reported to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026465

    Original file (20100026465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026465 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Evidence shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 2004 on which his date of entry erroneously appears as 2 April 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000869

    Original file (20090000869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, dated 10 January 2009, and several medical documents, reports, notes, and examinations, through the DVA and/or civilian medical providers, dated on miscellaneous dates in 2008, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. On 30 April 1999, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at Fort Benning, Georgia, to evaluate the applicant’s medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005917

    Original file (20090005917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states, in pertinent part, that item 14 (Military Education) will list formal in-service training courses of 40 hours or more successfully completed during the period of service covered by title, length in weeks, and month and year completed. Although the evidence of record shows he was awarded PMOS 91A, there are no orders which show he was awarded the Expert Field Medical Badge and the applicant has not provided any supporting evidence to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015597

    Original file (20080015597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DVA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual’s civilian employability. The governing regulation shows the Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting that were incurred or aggravated during the period of service. The evidence of record shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022883

    Original file (20100022883.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show, in effect: * his characterization of service is honorable * award of the Purple Heart, Parachutist Badge, and all of his unit citations * he was granted disability for shrapnel wounds to the left shoulder and for the jungle rot that is on his legs * he was exposed to Agent Orange 2. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014624

    Original file (20100014624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 November 2009, in response to a request for award of the Air Medal, the Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia informed the applicant that there was no record of orders awarding him the Air Medal and his records did not contain orders or flight records showing he was authorized to participate in frequent aerial flights over hostile territory. U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided additional guidelines for award of the Air Medal in Vietnam....