Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026465
Original file (20100026465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026465 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of entry be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 August 2004 to show "2004 02 04" [4 February 2004] instead of "2004 04 02" [2 April 2004].

2.  He states that although he entered active duty on 4 February 2004, item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 indicates he entered active duty on 2 April 2004.  He attributes this mistake to a typographic error and states he never noticed it until he was recently attempting to have his Basic Active Service Date corrected in order to be eligible for promotion board consideration.

3.  He provides his:

* initial enlistment contract
* orders to attend Basic Combat Training (BCT) and Advanced Individual Training (AIT)
* orders awarding him a Primary Military Occupational Specialty (PMOS)
* DD Form 214 in support of his case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His record contains (and he also provides):

	a.  a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document of the U.S.) which shows he enlisted in U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 31 December 2003 for a period of 8 years.

	b.  a DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Procession - Armed Forces of the U.S.) which shows he enlisted in U.S. Army Reserve on 31 December 2003 for a period of 8 years.  This form also shows he had a projected active duty service date of 4 February 2004.

	c.  Orders Number 4007-25 issued by Military Entrance Processing Station, Boston, MA, on 7 January 2004 which show he was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) to attend BCT at Fort Jackson, SC with a reporting date of 4 February 2004 and a follow-on reporting date to Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 19 April 2004 for the purpose of attending AIT for MOS 91W.

	d.  Orders Number 070-290 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Jackson, SC, on 10 March 2004 which show he was released from attachment following BCT at Fort Jackson, SC, and attached to Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 16 April 2004 for the purpose of attending AIT for MOS 91W.

	e.  Orders Number182-261 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School and Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 30 June 2004 which show he was awarded PMOS 91W, effective 10 August 2004.

3.  Item 12 (Record of Service) of his DD Form 214 contains the following pertinent information:

	a.  Item 12a shows he entered active duty on 2 April 2004.

	b.  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) shows he was released from IADT on 10 August 2004.

	c.  Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) shows his net active service for the period covered by this form was 0 years, 4 months, and 9 days.

	d.  Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) shows his net inactive service for a previous period was 0 years, 3 months, and 1 day.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  This regulation establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states:

	a.  the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge;

	b.  the date of enlistment or reenlistment would be entered in item 12a;

	c.  the Soldier's transition date will be entered in item 12b;

	d.  amount of service this period, computed by subtracting item 12a from 12b will be entered in item 12c;

	e.  amount of total prior active service will be entered in item 12c; and

	f.  amount of total prior inactive service will be entered in item 12e.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of entry as 4 February 2004 was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  Evidence clearly shows:

	a.  he enlisted in the USAR on 31 December 2003 and entered active duty on 4 February 2004 following a 1 month and 4 day period of inactive service;

	b.  he served on active duty from 4 February 2004 until he was released from IADT on 10 August 2004, a period of 6 months and 7 days of active duty service; and

	c.  he had no prior active or inactive service before his 31 December 2003 enlistment.

3.  Evidence shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 2004 on which his date of entry erroneously appears as 2 April 2004.  As a result, the calculations used to determine his net active service and prior inactive service were incorrect.

4.  In view of the foregoing, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to accurately reflect his proper date of entry on active duty, net active service, and total prior inactive service.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  _____X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the applicants DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 August 2004 be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the current entry in item 12a and replacing it with "2004 02 04";

	b.  deleting the current entry in item 12c and replacing it with "0000 06 07"; and

	c.  deleting the current entry in item 12e and replacing it with "0000 01 04."



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026465





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026465



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511855C070209

    Original file (9511855C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) that he was on active duty from 18 March through 10 November 1993, and that his primary specialty was 91J10 (Physical Therapy Specialist). A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II) indicates that the applicant attended and completed basic training during the period 9 January through 13 March 1992; that he attended and completed AIT during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010085C071029

    Original file (20060010085C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A), dated 18 October 1985; Enlistment Contract (DD Form 4/1,4/2 and 4/3); Verification of Personnel Data (DD Form 1966/1-/8); Statements of Enlistment (DA Forms 3286- 40 and 3280-5); Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) Travel Orders 196-5, dated 30 September 2003; Dental Treatment Record (SF 608); Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders, dated 23 February 1984;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017141C070206

    Original file (20050017141C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Peguine M. Taylor | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 12a (Date entered AD This Period), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 July 1987, to show the entry "1986 01 17" (17 January 1986). The applicant states, in effect, that his records reflect that he entered active duty (AD) on 23 June 1987; however, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011050

    Original file (20100011050.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Item 12 (Record of Service), to show his time on active duty for Basic Training (BT) and Advanced Individual Training (AIT) for military occupational specialty (MOS) 09L (Translator Aide). The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 8 December 2006 and he served through 24 May 2007 for a period of 5 months and 17 days. The evidence shows he was issued a DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007144

    Original file (20130007144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's contract, dated 16 August 2010, stated she was enlisting in MOS 35P for a bonus of $5,000 and she did not become MOSQ until 25 October 2012. As specified in her enlistment contract, she was required to become MOSQ within 24 months of her enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records and the Army National Guard of the individual concerned be corrected to: * show she enlisted in the ARNG for MOS 35P and qualified for a $5,000 enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001647C070208

    Original file (20040001647C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his Reserve service, his foreign service, his home of record (HOR) as Pennsylvania; and his $600.00 additional Montgomery GI Bill deduction. Item 7b of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 February 2004 shows his HOR as ____ Oklahoma City, OK. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 February 2004 of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013394

    Original file (20140013394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 September 2004 to show she entered active duty on 18 March 2003 instead of 7 February 2003. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 March 2003 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 September 2004 * active duty orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, block 12a of this DD Form 214 should be corrected to show she entered active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021192

    Original file (20120021192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct date of birth (DOB), date entered active duty, and reentry eligibility (RE) code. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his DOB as 24 November 1957, Date Entered Active Duty as 10 December 1978, that he was issued an RE code other than "RE-3" and "RE-3B", and an upgrade of his discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DOB is 24 November 1957 and that his DOB is correctly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001299

    Original file (20070001299.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty), of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), issued on 9 December 2004, to show her correct primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) of "71G10" instead of "91G10," that item 12a (Date entered AD [Active Duty] This Period), be corrected to show the entry "1998 06 25" (25 June 1998) instead of the entry "1998 12 28" (28 December 1998), and that item 14 (Military Education) be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081142C070215

    Original file (2002081142C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board concluded that the applicant's commander recommended that he be placed in the IRR; however, his DD Form 214 and orders confirmed that the applicant's discharge was directed and fail to show transfer. The separation authority directed transfer to the IRR; however, the applicant's orders and DD Form 214 failed to show transfer. The regulation clearly stated that soldiers separated for unsatisfactory performance whose service is characterized as honorable would be transferred to the IRR.