Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001030
Original file (20120001030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001030 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 30 November 1994 to read command sergeant major (CSM) instead of sergeant major (SGM).

2.  The applicant states that prior to retirement he had moved from a CSM assignment to an SGM position due to having a medical profile that hampered his effectiveness as a battalion CSM.

3.  The applicant provides his:

* retirement orders
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 30 June 1977.  He had previously served 3 years, 2 months, and 8 days of active service in the RA.

3.  He was promoted to SGM/E-9 effective 1 September 1990.

4.  His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record).

	a.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) indicates he was appointed as a CSM effective 10 January 1992.

	b.  Item 35 (Record of Assignment) indicates he was assigned twice as a CSM as follows:

* Headquarters and Headquarters Battery (HHB), 5th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery, on 17 January 1992
* HHB, 1st Battalion, 14th Field Artillery, on 9 June 1993

5.  Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOER's) with ending dates of May 1992, May 1993, and May 1994 show his assignments as a CSM.  The NCOER's also show he served honorably as a CSM.

6.  Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood, Fort Hood, TX, Orders S-99-5, dated 2 June 1994, terminated his rank of CSM and appointed him as an SGM with a date of rank of 1 September 1990.

7.  On 6 June 1994, he requested voluntary retirement for length of service.  On 21 July 1994, his retirement was approved for 1 December 1994.

8.  Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood, Fort Hood, TX, Orders 141-37, dated 26 July 1994, released him from active duty effective 30 November 1994 and placed him on the Retired List on the following day.  His retired grade of rank is shown as CSM.

9.  On 30 November 1994, he retired.  Item 4a of his DD Form 214 shows his rank as SGM.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), then in effect, stated a Soldier holding the grade title of SGM at retirement would be placed on the Retired List in the grade title of CSM if his or her records reflected honorable service as a CSM and he or she was released from the CSM Program, voluntarily or involuntarily, because of an assignment-limiting medical or physical condition, or to serve as an SGM in any duty assignment.  Retirement orders on eligible members would show active duty as SGM/E-9 and placement on the retired list as CSM/E-9.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  
Table 2-1 stated the active duty grade of rank at the time of separation was to be entered in item 4a of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His NCOER's show he served honorably as a CSM from February 1992 through May 1994.  Therefore, he was entitled to be placed on the Retired List in the rank of CSM.  His retirement orders show his retired grade of rank as CSM.

2.  He was terminated as a CSM on 2 June 1994 and laterally appointed as an SGM.  He requested voluntary retirement for length of service on 6 June 1994 and was approved for retirement on 21 July 1994 with a retirement date of 1 December 1994.  On 30 November 1994, the date of his separation, he was serving as an SGM.  Therefore, the entry SGM in item 4a of his DD Form 214 is correct.

3.  In view of the above, there is no basis to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001030



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001030



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006568

    Original file (20140006568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. While his records on iPERMS and SMS are void of his retirement orders, they contain and he was issued a DD Form 214 showing his retired rank as CSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * adding to this DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 August 1994 the: * Meritorious Service Medal * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020072

    Original file (20100020072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was laterally appointed/promoted to command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) - "SGM E9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) - "23 Nov 66" (i.e., 23 November 1966); c. item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties [MOS]) he was awarded primary MOS 13Z5O and secondary MOS 15E5O (Pershing Missile Crewman) on 23 November 1966; d. item 33 (Appointments and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009489

    Original file (20080009489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect, that Item 4a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank title as command sergeant major (CSM) and Item 13 should be corrected by adding the Legion of Merit (LOM). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 30 November 1987, the date of his REFRAD for retirement, lists his rank title as SGM in Item 4a, and does not include the LOM in Item 13.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015040

    Original file (20110015040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Each promotion selection list issued by a promotion board is a new report and will be integrated with the PPRL. Soldiers who have not been promoted within 2 years from the board date will be automatically removed from the PPRL. The evidence of record shows that while the applicant was recommended for promotion to SGM in January 2007, no vacancies were reported within her MOS within 2 years and her name was removed from the PPRL in February 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007172

    Original file (20080007172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, V Corps, Orders 5-1, dated 11 January 1994, show the applicant was placed on the retired list in the retired rank of First Sergeant/E-8. There is no evidence in the available record that shows the applicant was selected for promotion to SGM/E-9. _ _______ X ______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010596

    Original file (20110010596.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He is entitled to have item 11 of his DD Form 214 corrected to show he held and served in this MOS 1 year and 8 months. He is entitled to have item 11 of his DD Form 214 corrected to show he held and served in this MOS 6 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 11 of his DD Form 214 the entries "92A5M Automated Logistical - 26 Years 8 Months//92Y5M Unit Supply Specialist - 8 Years 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008580

    Original file (20080008580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 June 1980 and his date of birth (DOB) is recorded as 18 June 1948. However, the message that announced that board specifically stated that the eligibility criteria for appointment as TPU CSM included, if the Soldier was a MSG with a PEBD of 1 March 1972 and later (the applicant's PEBD was 16 June 1974) and with a date of rank of 6 June 2001 and earlier (the applicant's date of rank was 16 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006052

    Original file (20090006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was appointed to the rank of command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9 and that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of CSM (E-9). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) the entry "SGM E-9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) the entry "29 SEP 67"; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served overseas in USAREUR in Germany from 10 September 1966 through 17 September 1969; d. item 33...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019015

    Original file (20120019015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (2) Paragraph 3-28b states senior enlisted promotions result when data is provided to the promotion authority that reflects requirements based on current and projected position vacancies; the promotion authority announces the convening date of the selection board, location and description of current and projected position vacancies, zones of consideration for promotion selection, and administrative instructions; personnel records of Soldiers within the zone of consideration are reviewed by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013430C071029

    Original file (20060013430C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) indicates, in Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to the rank of Sergeant Major (SGM) and pay grade of E-9 on 20 January 1976. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no indication that he was ever selected for CSM by a properly constituted Department of the Army (DA) selection board, or that he was ever laterally appointed to the rank of CSM by proper authority while serving on...