Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000227
Original file (20120000227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000227 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, approval of the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his son.

2.  The applicant states that he attempted to transfer his education benefits to his son on the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) website but his dependents did not "propagate."  His son is 21 years old and a full-time student at California State, Northridge.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Joint Force Headquarters (JFH) California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Orders Number 149-1025, dated 29 May 2009
* Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 memorandum, dated 3 May 2008

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After completing 20 years, 5 months, and 6 days of creditable active service, the applicant retired from the CAARNG on 30 April 2009 in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

2.  The applicant provides copies of his amended retirement orders, his 
DD Form 214, and his notification of eligibility to retire at age 60.

3.  On 9 July 2012, this office received an unfavorable advisory opinion from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, National Guard Bureau, recommending disapproval of the applicant's request to transfer his education benefits.  The opinion cited Public Law 110-252 and its amendment Public Law 111-377 which establish the eligibility for Post-9/11 benefits and limit the transfer of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on Active Duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

4.  On 9 July 2012, the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement/rebuttal.  No response was received.

5.  On 22 June 2009, Department of Defense (DOD) guidance established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, provided he or she:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election;

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute;

	
   c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and

	d.  for those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service is required.

6.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post-9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests approval of TEB under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his son.

2.  The policy to transfer benefits was not implemented until July 2009 and required individuals to be on active duty as of 1 August 2009.  He retired on 30 April 2009, approximately 3 months prior to the implementation of the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program; therefore, by law he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the program to his family members.

3.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000227



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000227



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005740

    Original file (20110005740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he requested in August or September of 2008 to transfer his Montgomery GI Bill [Post 9/11 GI Bill] to his son; but, no records were found. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits (emphasis added) because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The applicant contends he requested transfer of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015550

    Original file (20140015550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 12 September 2009. Therefore, as a matter of equity, his records should be corrected to show he made a timely application to transfer at least 1 month of his unused education benefits to his eligible dependents, in accordance with the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019129

    Original file (20110019129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement, but she was not eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children because the law requires the Soldier to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018354

    Original file (20140018354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows: * the applicant allocated 36 months of benefits to his spouse when he applied for TEB * the applicant reduced the total number of months his spouse could receive on 11 September 2014 * it was discovered the applicant did not fulfill the one year TEB service obligation requirement * review of the applicant’s record revealed his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service from 17 March 1989 to 26 September 1990 had to be included in his obligation requirement * his combined USAR and active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004799

    Original file (20140004799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer his education benefits under the TEB on 29 October 2009, which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his records to show he transferred the remaining balance of his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program to his youngest son. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005370

    Original file (20130005370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012606

    Original file (20140012606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer education benefits to his dependent child under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant requests that he be allowed to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent son. Since there is no evidence that shows the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit while in an active status, as required by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009934

    Original file (20120009934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his son under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant in this case had 20 years of service upon retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer the benefit because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013151

    Original file (20140013151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement which essentially writes: * in 2014 he contacted the Fort Carson education center to ask about TEB * he was told he should have done this while he was on active duty and prior to his retirement * he was never made aware of this requirement while going through his retirement transition; he would have done so had he known * his son is a straight "A" student who has been on the honor roll for 3 consecutive years * his son is a gifted student and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021979

    Original file (20130021979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any documentation that indicates he transferred, or attempted to transfer, his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his date of retirement. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.