Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000151
Original file (20120000151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000151 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3. 

2.  The applicant states due to the length of time he stayed in the military, a promotion should have been given to him.  He spent 1 year at Fort Campbell, KY, after leaving overseas.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 January 1985 in the rank/grade of private/E-1 and he held military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).

3.  He served in Panama from 10 June 1985 to 4 June 1987.  Upon completion of his overseas tour, he was reassigned to Fort Campbell, KY.

3.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was:

* Promoted to private/E-2 on 29 July 1985
* Promoted to PFC/E-3 on 1 October 1985
* Promoted to SP4/E-4 on 29 January 1986
* Reduced to PFC/E-3 on 2 March 1987

4.  He was released from active duty on 31 May 1988 and transferred to the Army National Guard (ARNG).  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* items 4a and 4b the entry "PFC" and "E-3," respectively
* item 12h (Effective date of Pay Grade) the entry "87  03  02"

5.  Prior to his release from active duty, he enlisted in the ARNG on 31 May 1988.  He was assigned to the 261st Signal Command, Dover, DE.

6.  On 21 February 1989, he was promoted in the ARNG to SP4/E-4.

7.  He was discharged from the ARNG on 15 January 1991.  His National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) listed his rank/grade at the time of his discharge as "SP4" and "E-4" respectively.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows he was reduced to PFC/E-3 on 2 March 1987.  He held this rank/grade until his separation on 31 May 1988.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was again promoted to SP4/E-4 prior to his release from active duty.  His DD Form 214 correctly listed his rank, grade, and effective date of pay grade.  He provides no evidence to show these entries are in error.  

2.  Subsequent to his release from active duty, he was promoted to SP4/E-4 in the ARNG on 21 February 1989.  He held this rank/grade until his discharge on 15 January 1991.  His NGB Form 22 correctly listed his rank and grade.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  _____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000151





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000151



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014982

    Original file (20070014982.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 15 June 1987, to show "specialist four (SP4)" instead of "private first class (PFC)" in Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and "E-4" instead of "E-3" in Item 4b (Pay Grade). DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 1 February 1987, shows that the applicant was promoted to PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), effective 1 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018332

    Original file (20130018332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5, effective 1 June 1987. The evidence further shows he was released from active duty on 22 June 1987, only 22 days after his effective date of promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the current entry in item 4a of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with "SGT" * deleting the current entry in item 4b of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012530

    Original file (20120012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 2 states: * Items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank/grade held at the time of separation * Item 12h shows the effective date of pay grade * Item 12c (Net Active Service During This Period) shows the total active duty completed between the date entered on active duty and the date separated from active duty * Item 13 shows awards and decorations * Item 14 shows formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001495

    Original file (20110001495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His request to correct his rank/grade and DOB on his DD Form 214 is partially supported by the evidence of record. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 5 of his DD Form 214 to show is DOB as “631128.” 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008929

    Original file (20100008929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his: * DD Form 214 with a separation date of 6 July 1984 * DD Form 214 with a separation date of 18 November 1987 * separation orders * discharge orders from the Ready Reserve, dated 17 August 1988 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 April 1987 in pay grade E-2 for a period of 3 years. However, if he had enlisted in the Ready Reserve and was subsequently discharged in the grade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018193

    Original file (20120018193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). On 30 August 1985, he was discharged in the rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013615

    Original file (20080013615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the applicant was promoted to PFC effective 1 May 1980 and to SP4 effective 1 August 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000087

    Original file (20150000087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056543C070420

    Original file (2001056543C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records also contain Department of the Army, U.S. Military Personnel Center (MILPERCEN) Orders Number D174-15, dated 24 September 1984, which placed him on the TDRL as a PFC/pay grade E-3 with an effective date of retirement as 22 October 1984 and with 80% disability. Law provides, in effect, that a service member may not be denied a promotion to which he or she would have otherwise been entitled were it not for the physical disability for which he or she was retired. Consistent with...