Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000035
Original file (20120000035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000035 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, a promotion to sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states:

* He was demoted to private first class (PFC)/E-3 before he got his promotion to pay grade E-5
* He was court-martialed twice because of an Army error
* He had no representation
* For 2 years he was a specialist four (SP4)/E-4
* The Army lost his promotion orders
* He was treated unfairly in Panama 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 11 July 1975 (U.S. Navy)
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 September 1982 (Regular Army)
* Orders 235-153, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, CO, dated 3 December 1980, as amended by Orders 029-170, issued by the same headquarters, dated 10 February 1981
* 3rd Infantry Division Certificate of Achievement, dated 28 April 1978
* Primary Noncommissioned Officer Course Diploma 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior service in the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 December 1975 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (indirect fire crewman).  He was honorably discharged on 25 September 1977 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 26 September 1977 for a period of
6 years.

3.  Orders 235-153, dated 3 December 1980, show he was promoted to
SGT/E-5 effect the date of the orders with a date of rank of 12 May 1979.

4.  On 25 August 1981, contrary to his plea, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 29 March to 30 March 1981.

5.  On 23 August 1982, contrary to his plea, he was convicted by a special court-martial of using provoking words.  His sentence included a reduction from SGT/E-5 to PFC/E-3.

6.  On 20 September 1982, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13, for unsuitability (apathy, defective attitude or inability to expend effort constructively), with a general discharge.

7.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "PFC." Item 4b (Pay Grade) shows the entry "E3."

8.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was:


* appointed to E-4 with a date of rank of 27 June 1977
* promoted to E-5 with a date of rank of 12 May 1979
* reduced to E-3 with a date of rank of 23 August 1982

9.  There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was re-promoted to SGT/E-5 after his reduction on 23 August 1982.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states for item 4a and 4b, enter the active duty grade of rank and pay grade at time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention he was reduced to PFC/E-3 before he got his promotion to SGT/E-5.  Evidence shows he was promoted to SGT/E-5 on 3 December 1980 and he was reduced to PFC/E-3 on 23 August 1982.

2.  Although he contends he was court-martialed twice due to an Army error and he had no representation, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence to support these contentions.

3.  His military record shows he was reduced from E-5 to E-3 on 23 August 1982.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was again promoted to SGT/E-5 after 23 August 1982 or prior to his discharge on 20 September 1982.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000035



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000035



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010202

    Original file (20090010202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as sergeant (SGT). The available evidence fails to show the applicant was promoted back to either SGT or SSG subsequent to his 10 August 1981 reduction to SP4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000087

    Original file (20150000087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010570

    Original file (20100010570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), in pertinent part, shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) that he served for 3 months in Korea from 24 July 1978 through 1 November 1978; b. item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) that he was awarded primary MOS 12B1O on 12 May 1977; c. item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was: * promoted to SP4/E-4 with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 October 1978 * promoted to SGT/E-5 with a DOR of 12 April 1980 * reduced to SP4/E-4 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006785C070205

    Original file (20060006785C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she was never in the U.S. Army Reserve and that her reserve obligation date in item 12i, of her DD Form 214, should be removed and that she was serving in pay grade E-3 prior to her release from active duty. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 5, paragraph 5-31, EPD, in pay grade E-2, with transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013615

    Original file (20080013615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. A copy of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that the applicant was promoted to PFC effective 1 May 1980 and to SP4 effective 1 August 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018193

    Original file (20120018193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). On 30 August 1985, he was discharged in the rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001660

    Original file (20090001660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claims he served his final 18 months as a PV1 without getting into any trouble, and he was told by his first sergeant (1SG) that his rank would show up in his pay (twice); however, it never did. Item 21 (Time Lost) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows he accrued a total of 33 days of time lost due to two separate periods of AWOL (18 November through 2 December 1979 and 2 through 13 October 1980. It further shows that he was reduced to PV1/E-1 as a result of a court-martial conviction on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013173

    Original file (20100013173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his effective date of pay grade to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 as "5" June 1984 instead of 4 June 1989. _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013173 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008308

    Original file (20130008308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar * the Basic Leadership School Ribbon, i.e., the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part...