Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010202
Original file (20090010202.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010202 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as sergeant (SGT).

2.  The applicant submits no statement in support of his application.  

3.  The applicant provides staff sergeant (SSG) promotion orders in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's record shows that on 15 February 1979, he reenlisted in the Regular Army (RA).  

3.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in Item 18 (Promotions and Reductions) that he was promoted to sergeant (SGT) on 
10 September 1977, and he was promoted to SSG on 8 October 1981.  It also shows he was reduced to SGT on 7 May 1981, and to specialist four (SP4) on 
10 August 1981.  

4.  On 4 May 1981, the applicant accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties on or about 22 April 1982, as a result of indulgence in intoxicating liquor.  His punishment for this offense was a reduction to SGT (suspended for 6 months).  The suspended portion of his punishment was vacated on 3 August 1981.

5.  On 10 August 1981, the applicant accepted NJP for operating a passenger vehicle while drunk and for wrongfully possessing marijuana on or about 
31 July 1981.  His punishment for these offenses was a reduction to SP4 and a forfeiture of $250.00 pay for 2 months.  

6.  On 14 February 1982, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of chapter 2, Army Regulation 635-200 due to expiration term of service.  Items 4a and 4b of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he held the rank of SP4 on the date of discharge, and item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) confirms his date of rank for SP4 was 10 August 1981.  

7.  The applicant provides Headquarters, U.S. Army Regional Personnel Center, Baumholder, Orders 284-56, dated 27 October 1980, which promoted him to SSG, with a date of rank of 8 October 1980 and an effective date of 1 November 1980.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains item-by-item DD Form 214 preparation instructions.  The instructions for items 4a and 4b state, in effect, to enter the rank and pay grade held by the member on the date of separation.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected to show his rank as SGT was carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.  

2.  By regulation the rank and pay grade held by the member on the date of separation will be entered on the DD Form 214.  

3.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SSG, on
8 October 1980.  He was reduced to SGT on 7 May 1981 and to SP4 on 
10 August 1981.  As a result, his record clearly shows he held the rank of SP4 on the date of separation and this rank is properly reflected on his DD Form 214.  

4.  The available evidence fails to show the applicant was promoted back to either SGT or SSG subsequent to his 10 August 1981 reduction to SP4. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. 

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010202



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010202



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010570

    Original file (20100010570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), in pertinent part, shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) that he served for 3 months in Korea from 24 July 1978 through 1 November 1978; b. item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) that he was awarded primary MOS 12B1O on 12 May 1977; c. item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was: * promoted to SP4/E-4 with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 October 1978 * promoted to SGT/E-5 with a DOR of 12 April 1980 * reduced to SP4/E-4 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005048

    Original file (20140005048.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his military education and that he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this military education. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000035

    Original file (20120000035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was re-promoted to SGT/E-5 after his reduction on 23 August 1982. There is no evidence of record that shows he was again promoted to SGT/E-5 after 23 August 1982 or prior to his discharge on 20 September 1982. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014815

    Original file (20110014815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Further, the USAR discharge orders that list his grade as SGT in the standard name line were published more than two years after his REFRAD and could have been the result of the unverified handwritten entries on the applicant’s DA Form 2 and DA Form 2-1. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013173

    Original file (20100013173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his effective date of pay grade to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 as "5" June 1984 instead of 4 June 1989. _______ _X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013173 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008308

    Original file (20130008308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar * the Basic Leadership School Ribbon, i.e., the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005240

    Original file (20140005240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Chapter 2 contains guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). The applicant's records are not available for review with this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014657

    Original file (20110014657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110014657 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s record does not contain nor did the applicant provide any evidence which shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 following the revocation of his promotion prior to his discharge from service. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019721

    Original file (20130019721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 11 April 1980. In the absence of the promotion orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show he was discharged in the rank of SGT/E-5. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.