Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000309
Original file (20120000309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  18 October 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000309 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  while a young single Soldier, he was medically discharged from the Army in 1969 without any expectation of being allowed reentry into the military;

	b.  he subsequently married in 1973, was accepted back into the Army as a chaplain in 1984, waived his pension, and completed nearly 26 years total active service and Reserve component service, which should entitle him to participate in the SBP; and

	c.  after retiring in 2008, he was granted SBP coverage on 21 July 2008; but it was immediately denied on 22 July 2008, based on an application he may have signed in 1969.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Self-authored statement
* Facsimile coversheet
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel)
* two Retiree Account Statements


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was born on 14 April 1948.  He initially enlisted in the Regular Army, on 26 June 1967, and continued to serve until he was retired by reason of permanent disability on 7 May 1969.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 12 days of creditable active service.

3.  On 3 June 1972, the applicant married.

4.  On 2 May 1984, the applicant was appointed a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army in the rank of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2, in the chaplain's branch.  He swore his oath of office on 21 May 1984.

5.  The applicant continuously served in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and in an active duty status as a USAR member during the following periods:

* 10 June 1984 - 19 October 1988
* 12 May 2003 - 10 May 2005
* 13 June 2005 - 12 July 2007
* 13 July 2007 - 14 April 2008

6.  On 25 June 2003, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, issued the applicant a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter).  It shows the applicant was notified he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP, his sole means of protecting his retired pay, and given 90 days to elect participation in this plan.

7.  On 21 July 2003, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5 (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) Election Certificate).  It shows:

	a.  he elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage;

	b.  he elected to provide his spouse an annuity at the full rate under option C indicating immediate coverage after his death regardless of his age; and

	c.  a witness authenticated this document with his signature on 21 July 2003.

8.  On 13 July 2007, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  On 4 February 2008, he completed a DD Form 2656 which shows:

   a.  he requested to retire on 14 April 2008 in conjunction with his 60th birthday;
   
   b.  he elected "spouse only" SBP coverage based on his full gross pay; and
   
   c.  he, his spouse, and the witness/notary authenticated this document with their signatures.

9.  On 14 April 2008, he was honorably released from active duty by reason of "completion of required active service" and transferred to his USAR unit.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows he completed a total of 14 years, 5 months, and 9 days inactive service and 12 years, 3 months, and 27 days of creditable active duty service.

10.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis Missouri, published Orders Number P03-803668, dated 19 March 2008.  It directed his retirement and placement on the Retired List on 14 April 2008.

11.  He provides two Retiree Account Statements issued on the dates indicated that show:

   a.  21 July 2008 - a premium of $367.75 was deducted from his retired pay for "spouse only" SBP coverage; and
   
   b.  22 July 2008 - "NO SBP ELECTION IS REFLECTED ON YOUR ACCOUNT" and he was reimbursed $367.75.

12.  Public Law 87-381, enacted 4 October 1961, established the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP).  

13.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.  

14.  Public Law 93-155, enacted 16 November 1973, extended the initial SBP Open Season from 12 to 18 months (21 September 1972 – 20 March 1974).

15.  Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established the second Open Season from 1 October 1981 – 30 September 1982.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be allowed participation in the SBP. 

2.  The evidence of record shows that on 7 May 1969, at the time of the applicant's initial permanent disability retirement, he was eligible to provide an annuity to his dependents under the RSFPP; however he was not married and had no dependents eligible to receive this benefit.  Subsequent to this retirement, he married on 3 June 1972.  Three months later in September 1972, Public Law 
92-425 repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP.  Given that the applicant was married, he was now eligible to participate in the SBP.  However, there is no evidence he initiated a request for this coverage.  Subsequent to his marriage and prior to his reentering the Army, two Open Seasons were held, thus allowing him two opportunities to enroll his spouse in the SBP at the full amount.  He did not do so.

3.  The evidence of record also confirms that on 21 May 1984 the applicant was appointed a Reserve commissioned officer and allowed to reenter the USAR.  As a result, his retired pay would have been waived.  Upon reaching 20 years of qualifying service and receiving notification of his eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 he promptly elected to participate in the RCSBP for "spouse only" immediate coverage.  

4.  The evidence of record confirms that he elected to participate in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage when he initiated his application for retired pay on 4 February 2008.  

5.  Based on the applicant's initial retirement and subsequent marriage, by law he should have elected SBP coverage within one year of the establishment of the SBP in September 1972, or during an available open season.  Based on his military service from 21 May 1984 through 14 April 2008 and his timely RCSBP/SBP elections, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record to authorize his participation in the SBP.
BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ____X __  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant made a timely election to participate in the SBP for "spouse only" coverage at the full base amount within one year of the September 1972 establishment of the SBP and collecting all back premiums due as a result this correction.




      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000309



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000309



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004861

    Original file (20120004861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired on 29 February 1972 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank of LTC on 1 March 1972. Public Law 97-35, enacted on 12 August 1981, established an open enrollment season for SBP from 1 October 1981-30 September 1982. All of these open enrollment seasons were extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed of their existence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013594

    Original file (20090013594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 18 September 1980. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005516

    Original file (20090005516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 October 2007, during his retirement processing, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656 in which he elected “Spouse Only” SBP coverage. There is no evidence to show he attempted to follow up on a request to add spouse coverage to his RCSBP. The evidence shows he did not attempt to change his SBP coverage until 25 October 2007, more than 6 years after his marriage to his current spouse and after a highly-publicized SBP Open Season that was in effect from October 2005 through September 2006 ended.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000967

    Original file (20080000967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 December 1997, an ARPERCEN letter informed the applicant of the FSM's election to decline immediate participation in the RCSBP and of his election to defer his final SBP election until applying for retired pay at age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019028

    Original file (20080019028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 January 2008, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) in which he elected spouse-only coverage, option C, full retired pay. However, although he divorced and later remarried on 7 May 1993, he still would not have been eligible to change his SBP election to include spouse coverage within 1 year as he contends he was informed because he had already been afforded an opportunity to elect spouse coverage and he and his then spouse elected not to do so. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961

    Original file (20070013961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024346

    Original file (20100024346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate on 18 August 1994 electing immediate coverage under option C for children-only coverage upon receipt of his 20-year letter. At that time, his election would have been sent to HRC because DFAS had not yet established a retired pay account as he was still under the age of 60. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 30 August 1996.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009927

    Original file (20080009927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 2656-5 dated 25 August 2005 shows that the applicant selected Option C (Immediate Annuity) to provide an immediate annuity to his spouse and dependent children based on his full retirement pay beginning on the day after the date of his death, whether before or after age 60. Based on the foregoing evidence, it is now appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show that he changed his SBP election to immediate annuity coverage for spouse only based on full gross pay without...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003750

    Original file (20080003750.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the following information should be brought to the attention of the Board: (1) he followed the advice of an AHRC representative; (2) he filed his application for retired pay in November 2005; (3) his application package was received by AHRC in November 2005; (4) his packet was not processed until after the open season; and (5) his retired pay packet was sitting at AHRC for almost 2 years. On 8 September 1989, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 and elected to...