Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025218
Original file (20110025218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 
	
		BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110025218 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from a "4" to a "1."

2.  The applicant states:

* his alcohol rehabilitation was insufficient
* he was an outstanding Soldier
* he deserves a second chance to serve

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Five letters of support

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served as a Regular Army (RA) chemical operations specialist, military occupational specialty 74D1O, from 19 September 2006 through 1 June 2011.

2.  While he was assigned to the 63rd Chemical Company, Fort Campbell, Kentucky, the applicant was arrested (twice) by local civilian law enforcement for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol.  On both occasions, he refused to 


comply with the implied consent law to submit to a breath analysis.  Each time he received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) – the first on 27 February 2011, and the second on 11 March 2011.

3.  On 4 June 2010, the applicant was arrested for DUI.  At that time he was command-referred to the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP).  He was determined to be alcohol dependent and was admitted to in-patient  treatment from 22 June to 20 July 2010.  Afterwards, he participated in aftercare sessions from October 2010 to March 2011, a total of 17 sessions.

4.  The applicant's chain of command notified him of the intent to administratively discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for alcohol rehabilitation failure.  On 18 May 2011, he acknowledged that he understood he was being processed for discharge as an alcohol rehabilitation failure.

5.  On an unknown date, the approving authority approved the applicant's administrative separation action with an honorable discharge.  On 1 June 2011, he was honorably discharged as an alcohol rehabilitation failure under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200.  His DD Form 214 shows he was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of "JPD" and an RE code of "4."

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.   Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging Soldiers because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to ASAP for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Initiation of separation proceedings is required for Soldiers designated as alcohol/drug rehabilitation failures.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 also states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (RA and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes.  An RE code of "1" applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other 


criteria are met.  An RE code of "4" applies to Soldiers who are disqualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.  An RE code of "4" applies to Soldiers separated from the last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  At the time of the applicant's separation, the SPD code of "JPD" is used to represent alcohol rehabilitation failure under chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200.

9.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  The cross reference table shows the SPD code and corresponding RE code.  At the time of the applicant's separation, the SPD code of "JPD" has a corresponding RE code of "4."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests a change of his RE code.

2.  The applicant's desire to return to service is commendable; however, his record clearly shows he had a serious problem with alcohol which he was unable to control.  His chain of command referred him to ASAP and every effort was made to help him with his alcohol dependence, including a 1-month in-patient stint and 17 out-patient therapy sessions.  He was correctly discharged under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200, and assigned an RE code of "4."  There is no error or injustice.  His RE code is nonwaivable.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025218



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025218



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010810

    Original file (20110010810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 23 February 2006 under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers. At the time of the applicant's separation, the SPD code of "JPD" had a corresponding RE code of "4."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004671

    Original file (20130004671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 November 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend that he be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020745

    Original file (20130020745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 June 2011, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 states individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty. However, the evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004667

    Original file (20110004667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was honorably discharged by reason of "alcohol rehabilitation failure." The SPD Code of "JPD" is the correct code for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of "drug/alcohol rehabilitation failure." The evidence of record shows his RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012644

    Original file (20130012644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains a DD Form 214 showing he: * was discharged on 24 January 2013 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 9, alcohol rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008196

    Original file (20110008196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 2. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Her records show she was discharged for rehabilitation failure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000159

    Original file (20120000159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022418

    Original file (20120022418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also advised the applicant that he was going to recommend his separation from the from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. However, there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018924

    Original file (20090018924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 2 September 1999. On 21 January 2005, the applicant was discharged with an honorable characterization of service under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200, alcohol rehabilitation failure after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 11 days of active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018997

    Original file (20090018997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He consumed alcohol on 24 December 2008. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals are assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure.