Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022418
Original file (20120022418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  
		BOARD DATE:	  2 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022418 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his reentry eligibility (RE) code from a "4" to a "1."  He further requests a change to his narrative reason for separation.

2.  The applicant states he desires to have his RE code changed from a "4" to a "1" because he desires to come back into the military to serve his country.  He goes on to state he was discharged due to failure of the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) and he has changed his ways of life.  He further states he never received any nonjudicial punishment and he was a good Soldier who needed to grow up a little more.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to 


timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant, at the age of 22 years, 1 month, and 15 days, enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 July 2007 for a period of 3 years and training as a Patriot Operator and Maintainer.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, SC and he was transferred to Fort Bliss, TX for his advanced individual training.  He remained at Fort Bliss which was his first and only permanent assignment.

3.  On 23 December 2008, at the age of 23 years, 6 months, and 26 days, the applicant was enrolled in the ASAP and on 6 July 2009, the applicant was found to be driving under the influence of alcohol by the military police at Fort Bliss.

4.  On 6 July 2009, officials at the William Beaumont Army Medical Center ASAP, Fort Bliss, prepared a memorandum indicating the applicant had a medical diagnosis of alcohol dependence and Cannabis-Related disorder – not otherwise specified (NOS) Sustained Full Remission and he was enrolled in the ASAP on 23 December 2008.  He was provided outpatient treatment with an emphasis on relapse prevention.  However, because he failed to adhere to the treatment plan of refraining from the use of alcohol, he was deemed a rehabilitation failure by the Rehabilitation Treatment Team on 6 July 2009.  He was 24 years, 1 month, and 9 days of age at the time he was identified as an alcohol rehabilitation failure.

5.  On 14 July 2009, the applicant was counseled by his battery commander regarding his consumption of alcohol in violation of his ASAP treatment plan and advised him that he had been deemed to be an alcohol rehabilitation failure.  He also advised the applicant that he was going to recommend his separation from the from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, due to alcohol rehabilitation failure.

6.  On 23 October 2009, the applicant's commander officially notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, due to alcohol rehabilitation failure.

7.  On 3 November 2009, after consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

8.  On 12 November 2009, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.


9.  Accordingly, on 20 November 2009, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, due to Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure.  He completed 2 years, 4 months, and 9 days of creditable active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) the entry "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9"
* item 26 (Separation Code) the entry "JPD"
* item 27 (RE Code) the entry "4"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure"

10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that an RE-4 code will be assigned to members separated under these provisions with an SPD code of JPD.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.

	c.  RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was properly separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure and he was properly assigned a separation code of "JPD" and an RE code of "4" in accordance with the applicable regulations.

2.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was wrongfully or improperly discharged or that he was issued the wrong RE code.

3.  The applicant contends he was "a good Soldier, just needed to grow up a little more."  Records show he was 22 years, 1 month, and 15 days of age at the time of enlistment; 23 years, 6 months, and 26 days of age at the time of his ASAP enrollment; and 24 years, 1 months, and 9 days of age at the time of his alcohol rehabilitation failure.  However, there is no evidence that indicates the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.

4.  As such, the applicant's contentions are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief under the circumstances.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022418



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022418



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011572

    Original file (AR20130011572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he would like to reenlist in the military. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 June 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Bravo Battery, 4th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 January 2009/3 years, 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 4 months, 12 days h. Total Service:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008998

    Original file (AR20130008998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a VA rating decision, dated 7 March 2012; DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award, dated 11 October 2009, indicated she was approved for an ARCOM; and her battalion commander’s recommendation for an honorable discharge, dated 17 November 2010. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014476

    Original file (AR20130014476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted his discharge packet as evidence that shows on 19 February 2013, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure for being a rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004667

    Original file (20110004667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was honorably discharged by reason of "alcohol rehabilitation failure." The SPD Code of "JPD" is the correct code for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of "drug/alcohol rehabilitation failure." The evidence of record shows his RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017599

    Original file (20110017599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 September 2009, the applicant was notified by his company commander that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, for alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure. Chapter 5 of Army Regulation 600-85 (ASAP) states that Soldiers who are rehabilitation failures will be processed for administrative separation when the unit commander, in consultation with the ASAP staff,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018997

    Original file (20090018997.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He consumed alcohol on 24 December 2008. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals are assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010194

    Original file (20140010194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests, in effect, reconsideration of the applicant's 8 July 2013 request for reconsideration of his earlier request for: * upgrade of his under honorable conditions (general) characterization of service to fully honorable * correction of the narrative reason for separation * correction of his name and social security number (SSN) 2. On 28 September 2009, the applicant’s company commander initiated action against the applicant to separate him under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000159

    Original file (20120000159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012781

    Original file (20100012781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 July 2009, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge of the applicant under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that he be furnished an General Discharge Certificate. Pertinent Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018664

    Original file (20090018664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) Code be changed so that he may be able to reenter the military. He was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-2 on 30 June 2006, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a general discharge. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE Codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.