Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025058
Original file (20110025058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110025058 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her enlistment contract to show she enlisted in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/E-3 under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP).  

2.  The applicant states:

* In accordance with paragraph 2-18 of Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), she should have enlisted as a SPC/E-4 under ACASP
* When she enlisted on 27 January 2011, she was not informed that she qualified for enlistment under ACASP
* She currently holds an Associate in Applied Science in Culinary Arts and an Associate of Applied Science in Baking and Pastry Arts, for a total of 4 years of formal training
* As a direct result of an internship, she worked for 51 months in a commercial food service institutional environment

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States)
* DA Form 3286 (Statement of Enlistment) - U.S. Army Enlistment Program)
* Employment letter
* Verification of academic qualifications letter
* Marriage license
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 January 2011 under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP).  She completed several allied documents in connection with this enlistment as follows:

	a.  Item 2 of her DA Form 3286 shows she enlisted for the U.S. Army Training Enlistment Program and the U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (High Grad Bonus and Loan Repayment Program).

	b.  Section VI (Remarks) of her DD Form 1966/4 (Record of Military Processing) shows she was authorized enlistment in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 based on 48 or more semester hours as stipulated in paragraph 2-18a of Army Regulation 601-210. 

2.  She was discharged from the DEP on 30 May 2011 and enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years and 21 weeks on 31 May 2011.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and she was awarded military occupational specialty 92G (Food Services Specialist). 

3.  She submitted:

	a.  A letter, dated 30 November 2011, from a civilian employer, verifying her employment from June 2006 to July 2010 in fine dining.

	b.  An undated letter from a supervisor of records at a university confirming her attendance from 27 June 2005 through 7 September 2007.  She earned a dual Culinary Arts/Baking and Pastry Arts Associate of Science (152 credit hours) but no official transcripts could be released because she owed an outstanding balance. 

	c.  Marriage license confirming her name change. 

4.  An advisory opinion was obtained on 14 February 2011 in the processing of this case.  An official at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) recommended disapproval of her request.  He stated that at the time of her enlistment, ACASP was not available for her selected MOS of 92G, nor is it available now.  She enlisted in the correct grade.  

5.  She was provided with a copy of this advisory opinion but she did not respond. 

6.  Army Regulation 601-201, in effect at the time, governs eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve for enlistment on or after the effective date of this regulation.  

	a.  Paragraph 2-18 (Enlistment pay grades for personnel without prior service) states in sub-paragraph a(7) a member who has successfully completed 48 or more classroom semester hours (72 or more quarter hours) (without a 4-year degree) at an accredited degree granting college or university listed in the may enlist at any time at pay grade PFC.  Applicants with an associate degree will be enlisted at pay grade PFC without regard to the number of semester or quarter hours completed.

	b.  paragraph 7-13 (ACASP enlistment control) states the ACASP enlistments will be controlled by HRC through the REQUEST System.  If a skill is not available, applicant will be advised of other enlistment opportunities available.  

	c.  Paragraph 7-17 (Skills available for enlistment and unit vacancies) states skills available for enlistment and unit vacancies will be ascertained by the REQUEST system before completion of ACASP enlistments.  Unit vacancies will be verified with the proper unit if required by REQUEST.  If REQUEST does not provide a requirement, applicant will not be enlisted under this chapter.  They will be offered other enlistment opportunities without entitlement to ACASP and accelerated promotion under this chapter. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3 based on the regulatory guidance that states applicants with an associate degree will be enlisted at pay grade PFC without regard to the number of semester or quarter hours completed.

2.  The ACASP enlistment option is controlled by HRC through the REQUEST System.  If a skill is not available, the member will be advised of other enlistment options.  At the time of her enlistment, ACASP was not available for her selected MOS.  It continues to be unavailable now.  Therefore, she is not entitled to the requested relief.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025058





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025058



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005999

    Original file (20090005999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The opinion stated that at the time of the applicant's enlistment she did not inform the U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) that she had obtained an associate degree. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contentions that she joined the Army with a degree in the medical field and that she turned in all of her documents to her recruiter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089419C070403

    Original file (2003089419C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her enlistment contract be corrected to reflect that she enlisted under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP) and that she was authorized an accelerated promotion to the pay grade of E-5 effective 23 October 2002. The Board granted relief in both of the applicant's cases (AR1999020793 and AR1999020967). Notwithstanding the advisory opinion from the G-1, the Board is convinced based on the evidence presented and the evidence of record that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021233

    Original file (20090021233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) series of forms completed at the time of the applicant's enlistment in the USAR show she was authorized enlistment in pay grade E-3 in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), Table 2-3, Rule E. 6. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of her record to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 or to show she was appointed as...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050017238

    Original file (20050017238.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 7-11 of the version in effect at the time, stated accelerated promotion of persons enlisted under the ACASP would be made either with approval of the unit commander or by the training commander for active Army personnel after successful completion of all training required by the enlistment program selected. The evidence provided by the applicant indicated it was USARIEM's intention to enlist her under the ACASP. Accordingly, given the support of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015542

    Original file (20090015542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of her application, copies of her memorandum submitted through the Commander, USARIEM; a statement from a sergeant; her college transcripts; her certificate for Medical Technologist (MT); a letter, dated 21 October 2008, from USARIEM; an SFS Form 29-E-R (Recommendation for Student Action); two pages from her application for enlistment; 3 pages from her enlistment contract; her orders, dated 2 June 2003, for transfer to the Medical Command Europe Replacement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022728

    Original file (20100022728.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her request that her enlistment contract be corrected to show she was enlisted in the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program (ACASP) for military occupational specialty (MOS) 91K (Biological Science Assistant) with an additional skill identifier (ASI) of P9 and that she be promoted to sergeant/pay grade E-5 as provided for under the ACASP for MOS 91K2OP9 with entitlement to all back pay and allowances. The applicant states the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014761

    Original file (20080014761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he should have been enlisted in the pay grade of E-4 instead of the pay grade of E-3 because he had completed two associate degrees and had 8 years of experience in his military occupational specialty (MOS) prior to entering the service. Accordingly, he should have been enlisted in the pay grade of E-4. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was qualified for enlistment under the ACASP in the pay grade of E-4, there appears to be no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002567

    Original file (20140002567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he enlisted in the Regular Army in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3. However, the FSM was awarded his 4-year college degree on 4 May 2013 and he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 May 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * correcting the FSM's DD Form 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017421

    Original file (20140017421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 September 2013, in the rank/grade of private/E-1. The applicant provides a DA Form 4187, issued by a representative of the Commander, 223rd Maintenance Company, dated 27 December 2013, that shows the applicant was advanced in rank/grade to PFC/E-3, effective 27 December 2013, in accordance with Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060610C070421

    Original file (2001060610C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her rank at the time of enlistment be corrected from private/E-2 to private first class/E-3. The evidence of record and staff advisory opinion confirm that the applicant met the requirements for accelerated promotion to the rank of PFC at the time of enlistment. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.