Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024739
Original file (20110024739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024739 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he was separated by reason of permanent disability.

2.  The applicant states the FSM's DD Form 214 shows he was separated by reason of temporary disability; however, he was rated 100-percent disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

3.  The applicant provides copies of correspondence from the Department of the Air Force Review Boards Office, the FSM's DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), a DD Form 294 (Application for a Review by the Physical Disability Board (PDBR) of Review of the Rating Awarded Accompanying a Medical Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), correspondence from the VA, and the FSM's medical records from the Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM's records, though somewhat incomplete, show he was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve when he was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve status on 24 January 1999.

3.  On 17 September 2003, he was honorably retired by reason of temporary disability and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in pay grade E-5.

4.  The applicant remained on the TDRL until his death on 22 January 2007 due to a motor vehicle accident involving a head-on collision.

5.  The applicant applied to the PDBR in 2011.  The PDBR informed the applicant that the FSM had been discharged based on a disability that existed prior to service and provided her with the PEB Proceedings, dated 26 March 2001.  However, those proceedings could not have been the proper proceedings in the FSM's current case because they are dated prior to his being placed on the TDRL.  Accordingly, they are not applicable to this case and will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that a DD Form 214 will not be prepared when individuals are removed from the TDRL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the FSM's records do not contain the relevant medical evaluation board (MEB) and PEB Proceedings, it appears that the FSM was placed on the TDRL on 17 September 2003 and he died before a determination could be made regarding his potential permanent disability.

2.  However, notwithstanding those facts, even had the FSM been retired by reason of permanent disability prior to his death, there is no authorization to change the FSM's DD Form 214 after he was placed on the TDRL.  The applicable regulation provides that the DD Form 214 will not be issued when an individual is removed from the TDRL.  Normally, orders are published announcing the change in status.

3.  Accordingly, the FSM's DD Form 214 does not contain an error and there is no injustice in this case to correct.  As a result, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024739



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024739



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010810

    Original file (20100010810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM) requests correction of her husband's records to show he was not placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL), but remained on active duty until the date of his death. The applicant contends the records of her deceased husband should be corrected to show he was not placed on the TDRL but remained on active duty until the time of his death so that she would be entitled to an additional $150,000.00 SGLI benefit. At...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050005901

    Original file (20050005901.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She is now requesting that the FSM's record be corrected to show he was retained on the TDRL and medically retired at the time of his death given his medical condition was obviously much more serious than the doctors thought when he was removed from the TDRL. The death of the FSM is truly unfortunate, and the applicant's claim is understandable because of the fact the condition for which the FSM was separated was a contributing factor in his death. The PEB findings and recommendations, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025122

    Original file (20110025122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM's available military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 August 1966. The applicant is basing his request for award of the PH to his later brother, the FSM, on the Medical Board Summary and informal PEB, dated 12 July and 29 August 1968, which clearly show the FSM suffered a crushing injury to the left hand with lacerations to the left hand necessitating partial amputation and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009717

    Original file (20090009717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant maintains that imminent death processing was no longer necessary at the time of her spouse’s death in December 2003 because of the passage of Public Law 107-107 which permitted payment of SBP benefits to the spouse of Soldier who died on active duty regardless of the number of years of military service, the ability to transfer that benefit to surviving children did not occur until the passage of Public Law 108-136 on 24 November 2003. Hence the military continued to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021665

    Original file (20110021665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse and legal guardian of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to include time spent on the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL). On 18 May 1983, a PEB found the FSM was physically unfit and recommended a combined disability rating of 100% and that the FSM be permanently retired from the service. The evidence of record confirms the FSM entered active duty on 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018524

    Original file (20130018524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased son, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he remained on active duty on the date of death rather than placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL). In no case shall a Service member be retired after his or her death or before completion of a required line of duty determination. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 (Public Law 107-107), dated 28 December 2001, and codified at Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012645

    Original file (20140012645.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB recommended a combined physical disability rating of 80 percent and permanent disability retirement. There is no evidence in the FSM’s pay records at DFAS that show he participated in the SBP and/or contributed any premiums toward the SBP. With respect to his permanent retirement, on 15 February 1972 a TDRL PEB convened and recommended a combined physical disability rating of 80 percent and placement permanent retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017814

    Original file (20080017814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was promoted to SPC; however, a correction to his DD Form 214 (DD Form 215) was never issued to reflect this promotion. No DD Form 215 was available in the applicant’s personnel record. The evidence of record confirms the FSM was promoted to SPC/E-4 on 1 December 1996, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, as evidenced by the DA Form 4187, dated 7 November 1996, USASTP Memorandum, dated 10 June 1997, and orders contained in the FSM record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005450

    Original file (20090005450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within a year of his marriage to the applicant. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP. Since the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005017

    Original file (20070005017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of the deceased former service member (FSM) requests correction of the FSM’s military records to show that he was still on active duty at the time of his death. The FSM was not mentally competent to accept the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings recommendation; therefore, an Army official accepted it on his behalf while the applicant was in route to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The United States Army processed an imminent death medical retirement...