Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005450
Original file (20090005450.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005450 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within a year of his marriage to the applicant.

2.  The applicant states that her husband was not married when he was medically retired.  They married after he retired.  They were not aware that he could have elected SBP when they were married.  His mind was clouded due to the heavy medication he was taking from his service-connected disability.  She contends that he would have elected SBP if he had been aware that he could have done so.

3.  The applicant provides her husband's death certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 10 October 1985, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (infantryman), and he was promoted to pay grade E-3.

2.  On 31 August 1986, a physical examination was conducted on the FSM.  This examination shows the FSM hit his head during a parachute jump landing which caused a closed head injury.  This resulted in lengthy, repetitive headaches and "blackouts."  Psychological testing was mixed, suggestive of both serious psychological difficulties and organic mental impairment.  The FSM was said to be alert, oriented to person and place, had clear speech, had linear and goal directed thought processes, and did not have any delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal or homicidal ideation.  His long term memory was intact but immediate and recent memory was impaired.  The physical examination was used by a medical evaluation board (MEB) which determined that the FSM was unfit for further military service and referred him to a physical evaluation board (PEB).

3.  A PEB convened and determined that the FSM was physically unfit and recommended that he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), rated at 30 percent disabled.  Accordingly, on 30 March 1987, the FSM was honorably released from active duty and placed on the TDRL.  In conjunction with his retirement he completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) wherein he indicated that he was not married and declined SBP coverage.

4.  On 26 July 1990, the FSM had a periodic medical examination.  In that examination it was noted that the FSM had married and had a child since his placement on the TDRL, and he was working a part-time job which he liked.  He showed impaired memory from his closed head injury, with immediate memory being okay, recent memory impaired, and long-term memory okay.  The FSM was determined to be able to handle his financial affairs and was found to be competent within the stipulations of Title 37, U.S. Code, section 602.  The FSM was referred to a PEB which recommended that he be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired due to physical unfitness.

5.  Accordingly, on 19 November 1991, the FSM was removed from the TDRL and placed on the Retired List, rated at 30 percent disabled.

6.  The FSM died on 9 January 2009.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Changes in SBP options are not authorized except in specific instances, or authorized by law.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to 
participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

9.  Army Echoes is an Army Bulletin for the Army Retiree published three times a year and mailed to Army retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.  These Bulletins consistently contain a reminder to retirees that they are responsible for updating their accounts within one year of marriage, remarriage, divorce, or upon the death of a spouse and that they may need to make or update a SBP election.  Periodically, these Bulletins contain articles explaining the SBP and the importance of keeping accounts up to date.

10.  Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an           Open Season to be conducted 1 October 1991 (but deferred to 1 April                1992) through 30 September 1992.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

11.  Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.  

12.  Public Law 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006.  Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the FSM was not aware that he could have elected SBP coverage when they were married and his mind was clouded due to the heavy medication he was taking from his service-connected disability.  She contends that he would have elected SBP if he had known that he could.

2.  However, prior to the FSM's placement on the TDRL, he was evaluated to be alert, oriented to person and place, had clear speech, had linear and goal directed thought processes, and he did not have any delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal or homicidal ideation.  His long term memory was intact but immediate and recent memory was impaired.  Prior to his permanent retirement, he was working a part-time job, but he showed impaired memory from his closed head injury, with immediate memory being okay, recent memory impaired, and long-term memory okay.  The FSM was determined to be able to handle his financial affairs and was found to be competent within the stipulations of Title 37, U.S. Code, section 602 at that time.

3.  Since all indications are that the FSM was mentally competent, it must be assumed that he made a conscious decision not to participate in SBP when he married.

4.  The applicant's contention that the FSM was not aware that he could have elected SBP after he married is speculative at best.  Since the FSM filled out an SBP election upon his placement on the TDRL, it must be presumed that he was informed by a Retirement Services Officer that he could elect SBP at a later date if he got married.  In addition, Army Echoes has consistently reminded retirees that they have a year to enroll in the SBP as a result from marriage or acquisition of a dependent child.  Further, three Open Seasons were announced in Army Echoes during the time the FSM was retired.

5.  Therefore, based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005450



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005450



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004639

    Original file (20130004639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 6 September 1985.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008620

    Original file (20050008620.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states she is not denying that the FSM did not enroll in the SBP; however, due to his 100 percent disability (chronic brain syndrome), he could not understand the papers sent to him. Two SBP Open Seasons were established after the FSM and the applicant married.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003841C070205

    Original file (20060003841C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records at DFAS show the applicant enrolled in the SBP for NIP coverage on 1 September 1973 during the first Open Season. As a retiree, the applicant should have been receiving Army Echoes, which provided information on five SBP Open Seasons conducted after he was married. Nevertheless, at the time of the applicant’s retirement in July 1972, he was a private E-2 and was probably unaware of his responsibility to change his SBP coverage when he married in 1975.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013961

    Original file (20070013961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. At this time but before 1 September 1969, a retired member who was participating in the RSFPP without inclusion of the former option 4 could have elected to have that option included in his election. The FSM retired in November 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011300

    Original file (20080011300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM and the applicant married on 8 May 1999. The FSM married the applicant in May 1999. However, the Army Echoes issued at the time he married the applicant reminded retirees that if they remarried and needed to make an SBP election they were responsible for contacting DFAS, clearly indicating that an SBP election could be made upon remarriage and clearly implying that the new wife could be covered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017621

    Original file (20140017621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the FSM's military records and the applicant provides no evidence which shows the FSM participated in the SBP or the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Since there is no evidence of record which shows the FSM made an SBP election prior to his death, and the evidence of record shows he had opportunities...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006132

    Original file (20050006132.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The FSM retired on 1 October 1979. There is no evidence of record to show it was the FSM's intent to provide the SBP to the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070492C070402

    Original file (2002070492C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her brother, Joe, was hit by a car in August 1976 when he was 14 years old. The FSM’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 February 1948. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM enrolled in the SBP on 1 October 1981 during the second Open Season and elected children only coverage, full base amount, and named his son Joe as a dependent child.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020598

    Original file (20120020598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests his military records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) prior to retirement. There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM elected SBP prior to his retirement. Although the FSM retired in 1968, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in the SBP when it was established in 1972.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020483

    Original file (20100020483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin established to provide information to retirees and mailed to retirees on a regular (e.g. quarterly) basis. There are no documents in the available records, or provided by the applicant, which indicate the FSM ever made an election to participate in the SBP,...