Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024127
Original file (20110024127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024127 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he desires his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge because for 20 years he has suffered the dishonor of the bad decision he made as a child.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a copy of his discharge orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was born on 27 November 1974 and he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in Baltimore, MD on 24 December 1993, for a period of
8 years.  At the time of his enlistment he acknowledged that he understood he would be required to attend all scheduled unit training assemblies (UTA) (at least 48 per year) unless he was excused by proper authority and that if he accrued nine or more unexcused absences during any 365 day period he may be declared an unsatisfactory participant and may be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) under honorable conditions.

3.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 28 January 1994 and he was transferred to Fort Knox, KY to undergo his basic training.  He completed that training and he was transferred to Fort Gordon, GA to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a telecommunications center operator.

4.  He successfully completed his AIT and he was released from ADT on 1 June 1994 and transferred back to his USAR unit in Baltimore.  He served 4 months and 4 days of creditable active service with his character of service as uncharacterized.

5.  On 8 October 1996, the applicant was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) with a general discharge.  The specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records.  However, the applicant's record shows that during the period of 15 February to 13 August 1995 he accrued 10 unauthorized absences.

6.  Army Regulation 135-178, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of USAR and Army National Guard personnel.  Chapter 6 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel because of unsatisfactory performance.  It provides that the service of a Soldier separated under this chapter will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions as warranted by his or her military record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no violations or procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.


2.  The applicant's contentions have been considered.  However, given the repeated nature of his unauthorized absences during his period of service they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.  His service simply does not rise to the level of a fully honorable discharge and he was almost 22 years of age at the time.

3.  Additionally, since either an honorable or a general discharge was authorized and since he received a general discharge, it appears his overall record of service was considered during his separation processing.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024127



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024127



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467

    Original file (20110001467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004473

    Original file (20090004473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records further show that he was notified in writing of his unexcused absence and that each notification letter advised him that if he accumulated nine unexcused absences within a one year period, he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for the balance of his service obligation. The records show that he acknowledged receipt of the notification letters as follows: a. on 10 March 1980, by certified letter, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018969

    Original file (20130018969.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the characterization of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service be changed to honorable and issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The doctor requested the applicant's release from service and stated the applicant was unable to continue in service. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for members of the USAR under the following circumstances: * after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018309

    Original file (20070018309.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 1981, Headquarters, First United States Army, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, published Orders 240-42, relieving the applicant from his USAR unit of assignment for being an unsatisfactory participant, and assigning him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training), effective 16 November 1981, under other than honorable conditions. On 13 April 1985, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, published Orders Number D-04-907107, ordering the applicant discharged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008847

    Original file (20130008847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be changed to honorable or a general discharge. A memorandum, dated 7 September 1995, shows the applicant was notified of her pending USAR discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5. There is no evidence that indicates she was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military term of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001290

    Original file (20110001290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR on 13 July 1979. This regulation states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when he or she accrues nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a 1 year period. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide convincing evidence which shows he encountered problems with his car while serving in his USAR unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010476

    Original file (20110010476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 22 March 1979 for 6 years. The applicant's record is void of the circumstances surrounding his unexcused absences; however, the Commander, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 18th Infantry notified the applicant by certified mail that the unit's records showed he had been absent from scheduled Unit Training Assemblies (UTA) on 2 August 1981, 13 December 1981, 22 and 23 May 1982, and 12 and 13 June 1982. As such, he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091007C070212

    Original file (2003091007C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008892

    Original file (20130008892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He and his commander signed this document wherein he stated: I, understand [that under the provisions of] [Army Regulation (AR)] 135-91 [Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures] and AR 135-178 [Enlisted Administrative Separations], as an Unsatisfactory Participant in the USAR unit to which I am assigned, [I] have been informed that I may receive a General Discharge. His record contains a letter from his commander, dated 21 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016457

    Original file (20110016457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his uncharacterized entry level status separation to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability. The applicant provides a copy of: * his discharge orders * his initial active duty for training orders * his admission to the hospital on 15 June 1992 * an Individual Sick Slip * memoranda from his unit * a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) for the period 1-30 June...