| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | ||
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was unfairly treated by his commander, who gave him the wrong date to report. When he did report, orders had been left at the gate to retrieve his identification card and he was unable to talk to the commander. It was not until years later that he received his discharge under other than honorable conditions. He goes on to state that there is nothing in his military records to justify such a discharge.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Cleveland, Ohio, in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 February 1980. He was ordered to initial active duty for training on 16 May 1980 and was transferred to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, to undergo his basic combat training (BCT). He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a light wheel vehicle and power generator mechanic.
On 12 September 1980, while still in AIT, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 1 September to 8 September 1980 and for failure to go to his place of duty on 31 August 1980. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
He completed his AIT and was honorably released from active duty for training on 15 October 1980. He had served 4 months and 23 days of total active service and had 7 days of lost time due to AWOL. He was returned to his USAR Unit in Parma, Ohio.
On 17 November 1980, the applicant's commander dispatched a Letter of Instruction (LOI) to the applicant by Certified Mail, which notified the applicant that he had unexcused absences for the Unit Training Assemblies (UTA) for 15 and 16 November 1980. The LOI was returned to the unit unclaimed.
On 16 December 1980, the commander again dispatched a LOI for unexcused absences from the UTA of 13 December 1980. Again, the Certified Letter was unclaimed and was returned to the unit.
Certified Letters were also mailed in January 1981, which by this time totaled eleven unexcused absences.
On 13 July 1981, the commander notified the applicant that he had been declared an unsatisfactory participant and that he was recommending that his case be considered by a board of officers to determine if he should be separated for misconduct. He also informed the applicant that if he was separated he could be separated under other than honorable conditions.
On 19 September 1981, the commander authored a statement to the effect that the applicant was a non-locatee, since all attempts to locate him at his address and phone number had been negative.
On 2 November 1981, the commander initiated a request to discharge the applicant for misconduct due to unsatisfactory participation. He provided the copy of the notification to the applicant that was sent to the applicant and was returned unclaimed as part of his request.
The actual facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not present in the available records. However, his records do contain orders which show that he was reassigned from his Troop Program Unit on 2 June 1982 for unsatisfactory participation and was reassigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training). On 21 April 1987, he was discharged from the USAR under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178.
At the time of his application to the Board, the applicant was incarcerated in the Marion Correctional Institution in Marion, Illinois.
There is no indication in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 135-178 serves as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel in the USAR and the Army National Guard. The regulation in effect at the time provided that personnel discharged under chapter 7, for misconduct or other patterns or acts of conduct would be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. The applicant's contentions have been noted by the Board; however, they are not supported by the evidence of record. Numerous attempts were made by the chain of command to contact the applicant, to no avail, regarding his failure to participate and his contractual obligations. The applicant simply stopped participating after completing his initial entry training and amounted to his being AWOL for the remainder of his contractual obligations.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091007 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/30 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1987/04/21 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR135-178 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | MISCONDUCT |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 626 | 144.6000/A60.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021383
His military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) contains numerous letters of unexcused absences with return receipts. However, his record contains a letter, dated 10 February 1981, subject: Unsatisfactory Participation of Statutory Obligated Members (Who Have Not Served 24 Months Active Duty), which shows his commander recommended that he be considered for separation for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, chapter 7, by reason of unsatisfactory participation. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004473
The applicant's records further show that he was notified in writing of his unexcused absence and that each notification letter advised him that if he accumulated nine unexcused absences within a one year period, he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for the balance of his service obligation. The records show that he acknowledged receipt of the notification letters as follows: a. on 10 March 1980, by certified letter, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088635C070403
It states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1-year period. At the time the applicant enlisted in the MDARNG on 2 February 1980, he knew he was enlisting in the Maryland Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army. The Board is sympathetic with the problems he alleges to have encountered with his grandparents' illnesses and their lack of transportation to get medical treatment when he enlisted; but...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010476
The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 22 March 1979 for 6 years. The applicant's record is void of the circumstances surrounding his unexcused absences; however, the Commander, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 18th Infantry notified the applicant by certified mail that the unit's records showed he had been absent from scheduled Unit Training Assemblies (UTA) on 2 August 1981, 13 December 1981, 22 and 23 May 1982, and 12 and 13 June 1982. As such, he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018309
On 12 December 1981, Headquarters, First United States Army, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, published Orders 240-42, relieving the applicant from his USAR unit of assignment for being an unsatisfactory participant, and assigning him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training), effective 16 November 1981, under other than honorable conditions. On 13 April 1985, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, published Orders Number D-04-907107, ordering the applicant discharged...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001467
She further requests correction of item 35 (Record of Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II), to include: a. These orders show she was discharged from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 on 8 May 1987. The applicant also requested to add to item 35 of her DA Form 2-1 the dates she attended the scheduled UTAs, the 16 weeks she attended IADT, and the 3 days of ADT at Fort Gordon, GA. 7.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008892
He and his commander signed this document wherein he stated: I, understand [that under the provisions of] [Army Regulation (AR)] 135-91 [Service Obligations, Methods of Fulfillment, Participation Requirements, and Enforcement Procedures] and AR 135-178 [Enlisted Administrative Separations], as an Unsatisfactory Participant in the USAR unit to which I am assigned, [I] have been informed that I may receive a General Discharge. His record contains a letter from his commander, dated 21 May...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004540C070206
By a letter dated 28 June 1981, the applicant's unit commander notified him that he was an unsatisfactory participant because he did not submit a request to be excused from MUTAs for the periods 22 to 23 November 1980, 24 to 25 January 1981 and 11 to 12 April 1981. The applicant was discharged from the USAR on 13 April 1983 by Department of the Army, Office of The Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center Orders D-04-900848 with an UOTHC discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017535
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation were appropriate considering all of the evidence of record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075494C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The board recommended that...