IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 14 June 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110023404
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his reason for separation be changed to a medical retirement.
2. He states he was diagnosed with anxiety disorder/post-traumatic stress disorder after being released from the military. The disorder was diagnosed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). He had several visits with the mental health office while in the military but was never diagnosed with this disorder by the military. He was also diagnosed with bilateral pes planus (commonly known as flat feet) by both the Army and the VA.
3. The applicant provides two VA rating decision documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 October 2007. He was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11B (Infantryman).
3. A Medical Command Form 4038 (Report of Behavioral Health Evaluation), dated 10 July 2008, shows he was fully alert, fully oriented, clear thinking, with normal thought content, and good memory. The staff psychiatrist found him to have an adjustment disorder with depressed mood.
4. A DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 1 August 2008, completed in conjunction with his separation proceedings shows he was diagnosed with flat feet. This document shows his physical profile as all "1's," i.e., he was found to have a high level of medical fitness and was found qualified for separation.
5. His records maintained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System contain his separation documents. Headquarters, 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Memorandum for the applicant, subject: Separation Under the Provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions, dated 12 August 2008, indicated his commander initiated separation action against him because he was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood. On the same date, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the memorandum of notification and that he had been advised of his right to consult with counsel prior to making any election of rights.
6. On 13 August 2010, he acknowledged that he had been advised by his consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5 and its effects; of the rights available to him; and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights. He chose not to submit a statement on his own behalf.
7. His record is void of any additional medical documents from his active duty service.
8. His record contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 September 2008 that shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17 (condition, not a disability) with an honorable discharge. This form shows he completed 11 months and 3 days of active service.
9. He provided a copy of his VA rating decisions showing that effective 7 October 2009, he was assigned:
* a 50 percent disability rating for anxiety disorder
* a 30 percent disability rating for bilateral pes planus
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel. Chapter 5 of this regulation provides for separation for convenience of the government. A command-directed mental health evaluation performed in connection with separation under paragraph 5-17 will be performed by a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, or doctoral-level clinical social worker with necessary and appropriate professional credentials who is privileged to conduct mental health evaluations for the Department of Defense (DOD) components.
11. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System according to the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, and DOD Directive 1332.18. It sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. It states that the mere presence of impairment does not of itself justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability. In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.
12. Army Regulation 635-40 further provides that the medical treatment facility commander with the primary care responsibility will evaluate those referred to him/her and will, if it appears as though the member is not medically qualified to perform duty or fails to meet retention criteria, refer the member to a medical evaluation board (MEB). Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB) for a determination of whether they are able to perform the duties of their grade and military occupational specialty with the medically-disqualifying condition.
13. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), paragraph 3-36, adjustment disorders, states that situational maladjustments due to acute or chronic situational stress do not render an individual unfit because of physical disability, but may be the basis for administrative separation if recurrent and causing interference with military duty.
14. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. His records show he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation
635-200, paragraph 5-17. The reason given for separation was that he was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder.
2. Medical documents completed in conjunction with his separation show he was diagnosed with flat feet. However, a document completed in conjunction with his separation showing his physical profile indicated he was found to have a high level of medical fitness.
3. Competent military medical authority found the only limiting condition he had was an adjustment disorder. As such, there is no evidence he had an unfitting diagnosis that would require an MEB.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ __X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110023404
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110023404
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001238
The applicant requests her uncharacterized discharge be corrected to a medical separation. While in initial entry training, on 22 November 2010 a physical therapist at Fort Jackson, SC wrote to her commander stating the applicant had developed pain in her left foot as a result of the normal physical activities required in training (marching, running, jumping). Flat feet (pes planus) is a condition in which the foot does not have a normal arch when standing.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00868
SEPARATION DATE: 20061020 The bilateral foot conditions, characterized by the MEB as “hallux valgus” and “bilateral pes planus,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. There were no other MH treatment notes for review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023804
The applicant states he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17 (Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions), for medical reasons. His DD Form 214 should show he was discharged for a disability because he has medical records that show he had several medical conditions that determined he was unfit for the Army, such as plantar fasciitis, lower back pain, and knee and ankle pain. The evaluation was...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01418
The CI’s chronic bilateral foot pain, chronic low back pain (LBP), plantar fasciitis and pes planus conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The IPEB did not address the remaining conditions (plantar fasciitis, pes planus and adjustment disorder).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which reaffirmed the IPEB’s findings for the chronic low back condition as unfitting, rated at 10%, but changed the chronic foot pain (bilateral) diagnosis to bilateral...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004106
The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he was medically discharged vice discharged by reason of conduct triable by court-martial. His available records show that he had flat feet when he enlisted; however, there is no evidence that he was diagnosed with a foot problem or any other medical condition while serving on active duty to include flat feet that prevented him from performing his duties and would have required referral to a medical evaluation board (MEB). Even...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00925
ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Hammer Toe Deformities52820%Bilateral Pes Planus w/ Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis S/P Bilateral Hammer Toe Repair of 2 nd , 3 rd and 4 th Toes527610%20070103Moderate Flat FootCat II↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓Thoracolumbar Strain; DDD L5-S1523720%20070103Right Shoulder Strain5299- 502410%20070103Left Shoulder Strain5299-502410%20070103GERD and Hiatal Hernia734610%20070103Tinnitus626010%200701030% x 2 / Not Service Connected x 120070103...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021576
Both his service and VA medical records show treatment for bilateral plantar fasciitis, pes planus, and anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified. However, the USAPDA stated he was found unfit for duty due to bilateral foot pain and recommended him for separation with a zero percent disability rating and severance pay. Upon a finding of fit for duty, there is no disability rating assigned by the Army.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01752
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Over several months she noted improvement with Zoloft, which when discontinued in December1998, she again became depressedand it was reintroduced.In June 1999, she became overwhelmed by a move to a new duty station and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071508C070402
On 22 October 1986, he completed a physical examination for the purpose of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). There is no evidence in the available records of a psychological disorder diagnosis by the Army or the VA. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform their duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before they can be medically retired or separated.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011019
He requested to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-17, provides for the separation of Soldiers on the basis of other physical or mental...