Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022976
Original file (20110022976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	 7 June 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022976 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to be paid the final 50-percent installment of his Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus based on the Board's previous ruling in his case.

2.  The applicant states the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) previously informed him that he had to repay his bonus payment because he was not a member of a troop program unit (TPU).  However, the Board determined on 30 June 2011 that he should be allowed to retain the bonus and directed that recouped funds be returned to him.  Accordingly, he desires to be paid the remainder of his bonus at this time.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the previous Board proceedings and a copy of his reenlistment contract.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) TPU in Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, in pay grade E-8 on 16 November 2008 when he reenlisted for an indefinite period of service and a $15,000.00 SRIP reenlistment bonus.  His contract specified that his bonus would be paid in an initial payment of 50 percent and in increments of 25 percent at the end of the second-year anniversary and fourth-year anniversary.  He also acknowledged that if he were involuntarily transferred because of a unit transition, his entitlement to bonus payments would continue.

2.  On 23 June 2009, the Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, dispatched a memorandum for SRIP Policy Guidance through 30 September 2009.  Paragraph 2d provides that Soldiers assigned to IMA positions are not authorized a reenlistment bonus and Soldiers transferring to an IMA position who have previously received a bonus are subject to termination and recoupment policies.

3.  The applicant volunteered for and was subsequently ordered to active duty in October 2009 as a drilling individual mobilization augmentee (DIMA) at the Casualty and Mortuary Affairs Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command.

4.  The applicant subsequently received a notice from DFAS notifying him that he was not entitled to his SRIP bonus because he was no longer a member of a TPU and that recoupment of the bonus was required.

5.  The applicant requested that the Board reverse the decision to recoup his bonus and on 30 June 2011 the Board determined that the current Army policy regarding the termination and recoupment of bonus funds was that Soldiers should not be penalized when they transferred from one uniformed element of Department of Defense to another.  The Board determined that it would be in the interest of equity to terminate the collection of his bonus and return any recouped funds.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the remainder of his SRIP bonus payments should be made based on the previous decision of the Board to allow him to retain his previous bonus payments has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  At the time the Board approved his request to retain his previous bonus payments, it was the intent of the Board that he be allowed to keep the monies he had already received, not to grant him additional SRIP payments.

3.  The applicant reenlisted for the bonus under the SRIP in which he agreed to serve in a USAR TPU as a condition of receiving the bonus.  However, less than a year later he volunteered for reassignment to the USAR Control Group (Individual Mobilization Augmentee) and was subsequently ordered to active duty as a DIMA.

4.  While it is not intended to suggest that his service as a DIMA is any less important as that of his duties in a TPU, the fact remains that he contracted for duty in a TPU and served only a year before voluntarily transferring from his TPU to a DIMA position which is not authorized to receive a reenlistment bonus.

5.  Accordingly, it does not appear that he should receive any additional payments of his SRIP bonus because the policy in effect at the time specified that individuals transferring to the IMA Control Group were subject to recoupment and termination of a previously-authorized bonus.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022976



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022976



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024301

    Original file (20100024301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024301 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reversal of the decision to recoup his reenlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was allowed to retain his reenlistment bonus, that his bonus recoupment actions were an erroneous collection/debt, and that all funds collected from him to date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015693

    Original file (20140015693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * memorandum, subject: Request for ETP for PSEB [Applicant] * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * memorandum, subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and ETP Process * memorandum, subject: ETP in Requesting Second Incentive Payment without Recoupment for [Applicant] * memorandum, subject: ETP for Requesting Grant Relief from Recoupment of Reenlistment/Extension Bonus * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009720

    Original file (20140009720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the agreement he acknowledged he understood: * he would be suspended from bonus eligibility if he entered a period of non-availability (transferred to the IRR) for a maximum period of 1 year for personal reasons or 3 years for temporary overseas residence, missionary obligations, or overseas employment obligations * he would be terminated from bonus eligibility, with recoupment, if he failed to extend his contracted USAR term of service to compensate for a period of non-availability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140004957

    Original file (AR20140004957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $10,000. IDARNG, MFR, dated 8 September 2012, shows the Commander, Charlie Company, 116th BSTB, stated: a. IDARNG unit officials received an email from the G1, Education and Incentives, dated 21 August 2012, asking if the applicant had reenlisted within the 30-day limit after his return from the ING; b. after contacting the applicant, it was identified he did not sign an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140004957

    Original file (AR20140004957 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $10,000. IDARNG, MFR, dated 8 September 2012, shows the Commander, Charlie Company, 116th BSTB, stated: a. IDARNG unit officials received an email from the G1, Education and Incentives, dated 21 August 2012, asking if the applicant had reenlisted within the 30-day limit after his return from the ING; b. after contacting the applicant, it was identified he did not sign an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015216

    Original file (20100015216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that due to unclear guidance spelled out in Army Policy Guidance and Policy updates with regard to eligibility of Soldiers and his transfer from a Troop Program Unit (TPU) to the Individual Mobilization Augmentation (IMA) Program he had been unjustly denied the total payment of his warrant officer accession bonus which at the time of his application was $10,000. Accordingly, his payment was properly terminated and he has failed to show through the evidence submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000713

    Original file (20070000713.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion recommended that the applicant be granted relief and paid a pro-rated share of the initial $2,500.00 bonus based on the 1 year, 8 months and, 14 days of service that he served which was 57 percent of the initial three year period. Evidence of record shows that on 8 January 2001, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a 6 year term of service for a bonus of $5,000.00 and his initial payment would be $2,500.00. However, the applicant is entitled to be paid a pro-rated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020930

    Original file (20120020930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the MAARNG for 8 years on 26 April 2008. In connection with this enlistment, he completed several forms as follows: a. DD Form 1966/4 (Record of Military Processing), wherein he agreed to complete 6 years in the Selected Reserve with the 772nd Military Police Company in MOS 31B. He agreed to serve for 6 years in the critical MOS of 31B and in a Military Police unit in exchange for a $20,000 enlistment bonus to be paid in two installments, the first upon completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006556

    Original file (20080006556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States), dated 15 May 2007 (DCARNG Enlistment); b. DD Form 3540-R (Certificate of Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve Service Requirements and Method of Fulfillment), dated 20 October 2006; c. Undated Written Agreement - Enlisted Affiliation Bonus; d. DA Form 5691-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment Orders),...