Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024301
Original file (20100024301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024301 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reversal of the decision to recoup his reenlistment bonus.

2.  The applicant states that he has been informed by finance personnel that he must repay his reenlistment bonus because of a U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC) G1 policy that in order to receive a bonus a Soldier must be a member of a troop program unit (TPU) and not in a drilling individual mobilization augmentee (DIMA) position.  He goes on to state that he is currently assigned to the mortuary affairs section at Human Resources Command – Alexandria (HRC-Alex) and attends drills monthly and supports a very critical Army mission, which is primarily staffed by Reservist.  He further states that the current USARC policy goes contrary to the Army’s philosophy of “One Army – One Fight” and he therefore requests that his reenlistment contract be honored.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his reenlistment contract and a copy of his leave and earnings statement for September 2010.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving as a USAR master sergeant when he reenlisted on 16 November 2008 for an indefinite period and a $15,000 reenlistment bonus.  He was assigned to the 316th Expeditionary Sustainment Command, a USAR TPU in Coraopolis, Pennsylvania at the time of his reenlistment.  He was subsequently reassigned to HRC-Alex for duty in the Casualty and Mortuary Affairs Branch.
2.  The applicant did not provide any notification from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to establish exactly what his debt entailed; however, he provided a copy of his LES showing that he had a debt of $7,291.67 that was being recouped at $882.00 per month.  This would coincide with one-half of his bonus entitlement which is paid in installments.

3.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G1 which recommends that the Board grant relief to the applicant by cancelling any bonus-related debts the applicant has.  Officials at the G1 cited three memoranda that address the termination and recoupment of bonus funds and contend that the intent of the memoranda was that Soldiers not be penalized when they transfer from one uniformed element of the Department of Defense to another.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant and he concurred with the opinion as written.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Given the advisory opinion received from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G1 which clarifies the intent of the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense memoranda regarding the termination and recoupment of bonus funds, it appears that the recoupment of the applicant’s bonus was the result of an administrative error.

2.  Therefore, given that the applicant was authorized to retain his bonus after being transferred to another activity, it would be in the interest of equity that his bonus recoupment be terminated as an erroneous collection and that any funds recouped from him be returned.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was allowed to retain his reenlistment bonus, that his bonus recoupment actions were an erroneous collection/debt, and that all funds collected from him to date be returned to him.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024301





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024301



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010820

    Original file (20110010820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the remission/cancellation of her debt due to recoupment of her reenlistment bonus. On 6 February 2010, the State Incentive Manager submitted request for an exception to policy regarding the termination and recoupment of the applicant’s bonus. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 which recommends that the applicant be granted relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021126

    Original file (20140021126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief from recoupment of his $15,000 reenlistment bonus (EB). A DA Form 4836, dated 3 June 2014, extended the applicant's enlistment, dated 9 July 2008, of 6 years for 22 months. His bonus addendum and Army Regulation 601-210 are clear that he was required to extend his enlistment within 90 days of his return to an active status on 20 July 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022976

    Original file (20110022976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested that the Board reverse the decision to recoup his bonus and on 30 June 2011 the Board determined that the current Army policy regarding the termination and recoupment of bonus funds was that Soldiers should not be penalized when they transferred from one uniformed element of Department of Defense to another. At the time the Board approved his request to retain his previous bonus payments, it was the intent of the Board that he be allowed to keep the monies he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017924

    Original file (20080017924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 June 2008, the Company Commander, HHD, 633rd Quartermaster Battalion, submitted an USAR Form 23-R reinstating the applicant's reenlistment bonus and stating the applicant had returned to the unit and made up all missed battle assemblies for Fiscal Year 2008. On 6 June 2007, he was reassigned from the 633rd Quartermaster Battalion and to the IRR due to accepting employment in Turkey, and his bonus was terminated. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003171

    Original file (20110003171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110003171 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 July 2009, the USARC Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, replied to the applicant's request for an exception to policy to cancel her debt resulting from her reenlistment bonus indicating: a. she reenlisted on 8 September 2006 for a 6-year $15,000.00 reenlistment bonus while serving as a military technician, b. at the time of her reenlistment, the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019023

    Original file (20120019023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The applicant stated he enlisted in the USAR for a 6-year period in MOS 31B and for an EAB of $20,000.00. His records show he voluntarily requested to be released from the USAR 94th MP Company and he enlisted in the NHANG on 11 June 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026565

    Original file (20100026565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a Standard Form 507 (Clinical Record), dated 22 April 2006, which shows he stated that his asthma prevented him from performing his military duties. He was medically boarded and determined unfit for duty and was separated from military service on 16 August 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006520

    Original file (20130006520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 September 2012, the applicant was notified by the IDARNG State Incentive Manager who stated his bonus was in jeopardy of termination with recoupment since he accepted an indefinite military technician position from 26 November 2006 through 20 July 2008 which became a permanent military technician position from 20 July 2008 to the present; however, he was eligible to submit a request for an exception to policy. The advisory opinion stated the applicant extended on 27 September 2005 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016516

    Original file (20110016516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000 officer accession bonus (OAB). The applicant states: * He previously served in an enlisted status and received a reenlistment bonus but he was commissioned as an Adjutant General (AG) officer in April 2008 * He executed a contract wherein he agreed to serve for 6 years in return for a $10,000 OAB * He completed the Basic Officer Leader Course (BOLC), Phases II and III and as stipulated in his agreement and he met his obligation in September 2009 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517

    Original file (20090014517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.