Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022715
Original file (20110022715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  23 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022715 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of an enlistment bonus.

2.  He states he never received his enlistment bonus prior to entering the Army or after he completed the terms of his enlistment contract.

3.  He provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 January 1997.

3.  The applicant's U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) Form 1122 (Statement of Understanding – Army Policy) indicates he enlisted for training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  This form does not reflect he was authorized an enlistment cash bonus.

4.  His USAREC Form 1122 indicates was entitled to tuition assistance under the Montgomery GI Bill in the amount of $7,316.64.

5.  He served on active duty for training from 25 February to 13 June 1997.  On the following day, he was transferred to the 250th Transportation Company, South El Monte, CA.

6.  Orders 087-38, issued by the U.S. Army 63rd Regional Support Command, Los Alamitos, CA, dated 28 March 1998, released him from the 250th Transportation Company by reason of unsatisfactory participation and he was reassigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (Annual Training),
St. Louis, MO, effective 28 March 1998.

7.  In the processing of this case, on 3 January 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor.  The advisory official recommended denial of the applicant’s request.  The opinion stated the applicant was never given an enlistment bonus and his enlistment packet does not indicate he was authorized a bonus nor did he sign for one.  The advisory official also stated the applicant was entitled to the Montgomery GI Bill.

8.  On 6 January 2012, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

9.  Army Regulation 135-7 (Incentive Programs), chapter 2 provides policy and guidance for the administration of the Selected Reserve Incentive Program – Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus.  Enlistment for this incentive is not authorized after 30 September 1996.  This incentive offers a cash bonus to an eligible Soldier who enlists in the Selected Reserve for the following: 

* Prior to 1 April 1993 - $2,000.00 for enlistment in a bonus skill authorized by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA)
* On or after 1 April 1993 - $1,500.00 for enlistment in a bonus skill authorized by HQDA
* On or after 1 April 1993 - $1,500.00 for enlistment in a bonus unit of the Selected Reserve authorized by HQDA
* On or after 1 July 1992 - $2,000.00 for enlistment in a high-priority unit as determined by the HQDA, Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations
* On or after 1 July 1992 - $2,000.00 for enlistment in a bonus skill authorized by HQDA that is in a bonus unit also authorized by HQDA
* On or after 1 July 1992 - $5,000.00 for enlistment through the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, chapter 7 or National Guard Regulation 600-200, chapter 3, in an MOS authorized by HQDA for the bonus

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions regarding his entitlement to an enlistment bonus are acknowledged.  However, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided any evidence that indicates an error or injustice exists in this case. 

2.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 21 January 1997.  His enlistment contract does not indicate he was offered, enlisted for, or authorized to receive an enlistment bonus.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022715



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022715



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015078C070206

    Original file (20050015078C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows, in pertinent part, that for a 4-year enlistment in MOS 63A, a $2,000.00 Enlistment Bonus was authorized. The evidence of record shows that, upon enlistment in the U.S. Army in MOS 63A for a period of 4 years, the applicant was granted a $6,000.00 Enlistment Bonus, which exceeded (by $4,000.00) the $2,000.00 Enlistment Bonus authorized by the Enlistment Bonus Program Changes message cited in the applicant's enlistment contract. The evidence of record shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015555

    Original file (20080015555.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he is authorized the remaining $2,000.00 of his $9,000.00 cash bonus. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding - U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), dated 22 January 2002, which shows in pertinent part, that the applicant enlisted for 4 years and for the U.S. Army Cash Bonus. The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted for two enlistment bonuses for a total bonus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002675

    Original file (20120002675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon his return from AIT, he was told that his unit had been reassigned to Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio, TX, which was almost 200 miles away. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. It also shows he agreed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510012C070209

    Original file (9510012C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    After 2 years of searching for a new unit without success, he was told that he had been eligible for a bonus as an instructor during the 2 years he had been looking for a new unit, but his MOS had then been removed from the SRIP list, making him ineligible for a bonus. Individuals who reenlist for a critical skill must have a valid position vacancy which requires the MOS authorized the SRIP, be MOS qualified for the position at the time of reenlistment, and be of the proper grade for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510358C070209

    Original file (9510358C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he completed a Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus addendum in conjunction with his enlistment. At that time he completed a $2,000.00 cash bonus addendum for enlisting for a bonus MOS. Army Regulation l35-7, paragraph 2-3, authorizes a SRIP bonus for nonprior service Reservists who enlist in either a critical MOS or a critical unit, as designated by the Department of the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006413

    Original file (20130006413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a. According to the ARNG AMEDD Officer Incentive Programs for FY08, she was eligible for both the HPLR and the Special Pay Incentive and would have received both if her paperwork had been completed correctly at the time of her accession into the ARNG. According to NGB Incentives Branch, she has a USAREC Form 1252 and USAREC board results which show the intent to contract for the Special Pay and the HPLR benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004584

    Original file (20070004584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states, in effect, that his enlistment contract shows "ACF - $40,000", not "ACF & MGIB - $40,000." The applicant's service records contain a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), Annex D, dated 28 June 2000. There is insufficient evidence to show he was not advised that the $40,000.00 listed as his ACF benefit was the total combined amount of the MGIB and the ACF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013562

    Original file (20100013562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not show any evidence of an enlistment bonus. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), item 35 (Record of Assignments), in pertinent part, shows he was assigned to the 1st Psychological Operations Company (Tactical), San Diego, California, on 19 November 1994, and he served in duty MOS 52D1O as a Power Generation Equipment Repairer. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted for 8 years in the USAR and agreed to serve his initial 6 years in a bonus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019783

    Original file (20090019783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 2005, both the applicant and the guidance counselor signed his “Statement for Enlistment - United States Army Enlistment Program” contract, which clearly stated in paragraph 2 (Associated Options) the following: In connection with my enlistment into the Regular Army, I hereby acknowledge and understand a. The evidence confirms the applicant received a total of $9,000.00 in bonuses which is outlined in the annex of his enlistment contract, which he and his guidance counselor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059648C070421

    Original file (2001059648C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that she be paid an enlistment incentive cash bonus of $3000. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted for pay grade E-4 in the Regular Army on 18 May 1999, for Army warrant officer flight training, Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 09W1. An advisory opinion provide by the Chief of the Accession Management Section, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), states that the $3000 seasonal enlistment bonus was authorized for the MOS 09W at the...