Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021746
Original file (20110021746.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    17 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021746 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) Orders D-07-136502 to show the effective date of his discharge from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) as 14 December 1997 instead of 31 July 2001. 

2.  He states the error is the result of lack of attention by administrative personnel producing the discharge/separation orders.  He states he served continuously; i.e., without a break from 15 October 1983 until his expiration term of service (ETS) on 14 December 1997, for a total of 14 years and 2 months of service prior to his reenlistment on 20 November 2009.  The Army claims he had more than 18 years of service at the time of his 2009 reenlistment.  This error is preventing him from receiving payment for a prior service enlistment bonus.

3.  He provides:

* his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 15 October 1983
* a DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 22 April 1986
* his DD Form 4, dated 14 July 1991
* a DA Form 4836, dated 22 April 1986
* AR-PERSCOM Orders D-07-136502
* a photocopy of handwritten service calculations
* an internet-generated duty performance printout   


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His military records show he enlisted in the USAR on 15 October 1983 for a period of 6 years.

3.  On 22 April 1986, he extended his initial enlistment for a period of 2 years resulting in an ETS date of 14 October 1991. 

4.  On 14 July 1991, he reenlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years resulting in an ETS date of 13 July 1997.

5.  A DA Form 4836, dated 2 October 1993, shows he extended his reenlistment of 15 July 1991 (correct date is 14 July 1991) for a period of 5 months with an ETS date of 14 December 1997 (correct date is 13 December 1997).

6.  His retirement points detail in the Integrated Web Services (IWS) database shows he last performed duty on 18 August 1995.

7.  Orders 01-199-020, published by the 63d Regional Support Command (RSC), dated 18 July 2001, shows he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 18 July 2001 for the reason of unsatisfactory participation.

8.  AR-PERSCOM Orders D-07-136502 show he was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 31 July 2001.

9.  A DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment - Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted again in the USAR on 20 November 2009.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Based on his retirement points detail contained in the IWS database and the fact he was transferred from a USAR unit to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 18 July 2001 for the reason of unsatisfactory participation, it appears he did not continue to satisfactorily serve in a USAR Troop Program Unit (TPU) after August 1995.  The reason the USAR waited to transfer him from a TPU to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 18 July 2001 and subsequently discharge him effective 31 July 2001 is unclear.

2.  His records are void of a reenlistment or extension of enlistment document extending his ETS beyond that of 13 December 1997.  It appears the USAR failed to transfer him due to unsatisfactory participation after August 1995 with subsequent discharge not later that his ETS date of 13 December 1997.  As such, in the interest of equity and justice, it would be appropriate to amend Orders 01-199-020, published by the 63d RSC, dated 18 July 2001, to show he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 12 December 1997 for the reason of unsatisfactory participation.

3.  Based on the above recommended change it would be appropriate to amend AR-PERSCOM Orders D-07-136502 to show he was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 13 December 1997.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending:

	a.  Orders 01-199-020, published by the 63d RSC, dated 18 July 2001, to show he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 12 December 1997 for the reason of unsatisfactory participation; and
	b.  AR-PERSCOM Orders D-07-136502, to show he was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 13 December 1997.




      _______ _  X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021746



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021746



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003647

    Original file (20080003647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) on 6 January 2003, and then to the Retired Reserve, instead of being discharged. AR-PERSCOM Orders D-01-200737, dated 8 January 2002, show that the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR effective that date. In pertinent part, it stated that promotion vacancies were not required for IRR promotions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077227C070215

    Original file (2002077227C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That she be authorized an antedated reenlistment. In that response, the unit retention NCO stated that the applicant was transferred out of her unit while she was within her 90-day window to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089538C070212

    Original file (2003089538C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Since the applicant had over 20 qualifying years of service, he should have been given the opportunity to elect to be transferred to the Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) and, from there, to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing: a. that he extended his 29 April 1991...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020456

    Original file (20110020456.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) that she executed on 3 February 2010 be voided and removed from her military service records. The applicant and a commissioned officer signed the document on 3 February 2010. d. Two email messages that show: (1) On 15 September 2011, an Army official indicated that the applicant: * was not authorized an affiliation bonus because she was required to reenlist for 1 year upon assignment and failed to do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069746C070402

    Original file (2002069746C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that her unit extended her enlistment until 2 April 2001, and that extension together with the first 60 day extension met the guidance provided by the 88 th RSC. • On 21 September 2000 the 645 th SSA recommended to the 88 th RSC that based on the advice of the USARC (Army Reserve Command) [that even though the applicant was on the weight control program, the command still needed to address the erroneous extension], he recommended that separation action continue simultaneously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073506C070403

    Original file (2002073506C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. USAR soldiers must request a waiver and submit documentation to show that nonparticipation was due to circumstances beyond their control. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021255

    Original file (20130021255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 July 1998, the applicant was released from active duty and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018867

    Original file (20140018867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for correction of her DA Form 4836 to show her ETS as 21 September 1998 was carefully considered and found not to have merit. The fact that she was discharged from the USAR on a date after her established ETS date does not reflect an error in her ETS date. There is no evidence of record and she did not provide sufficient evidence to show her ETS was established as 21 September 1998.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006995

    Original file (20100006995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve is not supported by the evidence.