Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006995
Original file (20100006995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100006995 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

2.  The applicant states records of his service in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) were not available [when he was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)].  He wishes to come out of his retired status and serve his country again.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Twenty Year Letter; an ARPC Form 
249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points); a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (USAHRC-STL); and e-mails from the 88th Regional Support Command (RSC) and U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the MOARNG on 31 January 1972.  He served in the MOARNG until he was transferred to the USAR effective 31 May 1979.  He served in the USAR in an active and inactive status until he was honorably discharged on 2 April 2001.  

3.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) in the interactive Personnel Records Management System (iPERMS) includes documents pertaining to his service in the MOARNG.  The record shows these documents were added to his OMPF on 1 February 1995.  The documents include a 
DD Form 214 documenting his initial entry training, a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and an NGB Form 23 (Retirement Credits Record). 

4.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) shows, on 18 December 1994, the applicant reenlisted in the USAR for a period 6 years.  Based on this document, his expiration term of service (ETS) date was 17 December 2000.  

5.  Orders 01-092-002, Headquarters, 89th RSC, dated 2 April 2001, discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 2 April 2001.  The orders show the applicant was held beyond his normal ETS date of 17 December 2000 through no fault of his own.  

6.  An ARPC Form 249-E, dated 17 August 2010, shows the applicant served a total of 29 years, 2 months, and 3 days, with 20 years of qualifying service for nonregular retirement.

7.  The record is void of documentation showing the applicant requested transfer to the Retired Reserve.

8.  The transaction history in USAHRC's Integrated Web Services (IWS) shows, on 18 June 2009, USAHRC-STL received a fax from the applicant requesting a Twenty Year Letter.  The IWS also shows the applicant followed up on his request on 17 July 2009 and again on 30 July 2009.  The IWS also shows, during 2009 and 2010, the applicant spoke with staff at USAHRC-STL several times regarding his status and correction of his orders to show he was assigned to the Retired Reserve.

9.  On or about 3 September 2009, USAHRC-STL sent the applicant a Twenty Year Letter notifying him he had completed the required years of qualifying reserve service and was eligible for nonregular retired pay at age 60.

10.  On 20 January 2010, a staff member at the 88th RSC sent an e-mail to USARC indicating the applicant had contacted him requesting revocation of his discharge order.  The e-mail shows that a retirement point discrepancy at the time of discharge had been rectified and that the applicant requested that a retirement order be published in lieu of his discharge order.  A response from USARC informed the 88th RSC that the request was disapproved, and stated further that the applicant's discharge was an ETS discharge, which was proper in the absence of a voluntary request for reassignment to the Retired Reserve.

11.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve: Enlisted Administrative Separations) states a Soldier is entitled to be discharged on the expiration of his or her service obligation, and normally will be discharged unless action is taken to retain the Soldier beyond such expiration date.  Once a Soldier receives his/her orders, such orders may not be revoked except in one or more the following circumstances:  (1) the orders are revoked by proper authority, either orally or in writing, prior to the effective date of the discharge; or (2) when one or more of the exceptions to the doctrine of administrative finality exist (i.e. fraud; mistake of law; mathematical miscalculation; and/or substantial new evidence discovered contemporaneously within a short time following the action).  After the effective date of discharge, orders may be amended by the separation authority only to correct administrative errors, such as errors concerning grade, social security number, or misspelled name.

12.  Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details and Transfers), covers policy and procedures for assigning and transferring USAR Soldiers.  It states that transfer to the Retired Reserve is authorized in a number of circumstances, but an eligible Soldier must request transfer.

13.  Chapter 6 of Army Regulation 140-10 stipulates that eligible Soldiers must request assignment to the Retired Reserve provided they have completed a total of 20 years of active or inactive service in the U.S. Armed Forces.  The qualifying Soldier must then complete a DA Form 2651 (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment) requesting either transfer to the Retired Reserve or discharge.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve is not supported by the evidence. 
2.  The applicant states records of his service in the MOARNG were unavailable when he was discharged and implies that the absence of these records affected his discharge.  The evidence of record shows key documents, such as his NGB Form 23, were added to his OMPF on 1 February 1995, well before he was discharged.  The reason for the delay in issuing his Twenty Year Letter is unclear.  Regardless of the reason, eligibility for nonregular retirement pay is independent of eligibility for transfer to the Retired Reserve.

3.  At the time of his discharge in 2001, the applicant had over 29 years of active Reserve Component service and was eligible to request transfer to the Retired Reserve.  The evidence of record does not show that he did so.  As a result, after reaching his ETS, he was discharged as required by law and regulation.

4.  The applicant's desire to return to military service is admirable.  However, in the absence of evidence showing he was improperly discharged or improperly denied the opportunity to request transfer to the Retired Reserve, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100006995



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100006995



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007719

    Original file (20100007719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested an extension to his discharge date based on the timeliness of his notification and the pending results of the September 2009 LTC APL RC Promotion Selection Board. By memorandum, dated 25 November 2009, he requested an extension of his discharge date based on the timeliness of his notification of discharge, the pending results of the 2009 LTC APL RC Promotion Selection Board, and verification of eligibility for Reserve sanctuary. Paragraph 7-4b states that an officer who twice...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017668

    Original file (20140017668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show additional retirement point credit for his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) during the period 4 October 2012 to 14 November 2013. The applicant provides: * response from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, dated 17 September 2014 * email from an official in the 88th Regional Support Command (RSC) and USARC Pay Management Division * memorandum, dated 30 October 2013 * USAR discharge orders, dated 26 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069746C070402

    Original file (2002069746C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states that her unit extended her enlistment until 2 April 2001, and that extension together with the first 60 day extension met the guidance provided by the 88 th RSC. • On 21 September 2000 the 645 th SSA recommended to the 88 th RSC that based on the advice of the USARC (Army Reserve Command) [that even though the applicant was on the weight control program, the command still needed to address the erroneous extension], he recommended that separation action continue simultaneously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013638C080213

    Original file (20070013638C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of his deceased son, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he satisfactorily participated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) under the correct social security number (SSN) and that he be paid any pay and allowances due his son; that he be paid the bonus for which the FSM enlisted; and that the FSM’s insurance policy be paid off. The applicant provides the statement, dated 14 December 2001, from the FSM; a chronology of events...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020810

    Original file (20090020810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 140-10, chapter 3, provides for Army Medical Department (AMEDD) officer removal and processing procedures. She was issued an order transferring her to the Retired Reserve effective 2 October 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she submitted and was granted an extension of her MRD through 2 October 2009; b. amending Orders P10-910909 to show the date she was placed on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013976

    Original file (20090013976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests he be medically retired from active duty. By his own admission, the applicant lived with HIV for some 19 years; his DVA records show he tested positive for HIV in the 1980's during a period of inactive duty service. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020894

    Original file (20090020894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her record to reinstate her in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) so she may maintain eligibility for payment under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program. The advisory official states there is no record showing the applicant reenlisted in the USAR on or after the date she completed her enlistment. There is no evidence she attempted to reenlist before or after her term of service expired on 9 November 2003 even though it was in her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003904

    Original file (20080003904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum, dated 11 September 2006, Subject: Promotion Policies for Reserve Component (RC) Enlisted Soldiers on Active Duty for Operational Support (ADOS) in Excess of 12 Months and Sanctuary Soldiers, USARC provided clarification to the 26 June 2006 memorandum. In a memorandum, dated 30 April 2007, Subject: Clarification and Change to Promotion Policies for Army Reserve Troop Program (TPU) Enlisted Soldiers on Active Duty for Operational support (ADOS) and Sanctuary Soldiers, USARC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020836

    Original file (20090020836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As relates to the issues raised in the subject OER, the board found there was insufficient evidence to show he: * displayed poor judgment and an inability to make decisions * demonstrated a lack of interpersonal and managerial skills in coordinating the actions of his officers and NCOs during mobilization * requested relief from his command * failed to prepare his command for deployment The board recommended he be retained in the Army and reassigned to a different unit. The board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005901

    Original file (20120005901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Since a vacant position was not available he had to choose between: (1) ending his mobilization and transferring to the IRR where he would be a fully inactive Soldier without a position, thereby revoking his promotion; or (2) transferring as directed to the IRR and continuing his ADOS tour with no negative consequences to his promotion as advised by USAR G-1. Headquarters, 81st RSC, Orders 12-006-00030, dated 6 January 2012, show his promotion to SGM was revoked. As a result, the Board...