IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 June 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021576
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show he declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
2. He states:
* he does not want to participate in the SBP
* he has attempted to cancel it for a year and he has exhausted all of his options
* his records were reviewed in July/August 2006 and he retired last year, but his records were backdated
3. He provides:
* DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record)
* Notarized statements
* Letter and memorandum from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1
* Letter from the Army Review Boards Agency
* Email correspondence
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 August 2001. He was married on 2 May 2006.
3. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was honorably discharged on 16 June 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of physical disability with severance pay.
4. On an unknown date in 2010, the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) directed that the applicant's disability separation be changed to a disability retirement. On 24 August 2010, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) electing to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage based on the threshold amount in effect on the date of retirement.
5. The applicant signed the DD Form 2656 under Section XI (Certification) which specifically states in part, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1 year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. However, if I exercise to terminate the SBP, future participation is barred." His spouse signed the form indicating she concurred with the SBP election made by the applicant. She acknowledged she had received information that explained the options available and the effects of those options.
6. A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 25 August 2010, corrected the following items on his DD Form 214 to show:
* item 23 (Type of Separation), Retirement
* item 25 (Separation Authority), Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph
4-24b(2)
* item 26 (Separation Code), SFK
* item 27 (Reentry Code), 4
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), Disability, Temporary//Nothing Follows
7. The applicant provided an undated notarized statement requesting cancellation of his participation in SBP. He stated:
* he was aware that he was within the cancellation period deadline
* he cannot afford to pay for SBP
* if he had received both his retirement and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits then he could afford the plan
8. He provided a notarized statement, dated 14 February 2011, from his spouse stating that she understands her husband's wishes to cancel participation in SBP. She acknowledges she understands that cancelling the plan means she will not receive any funds from the plan if he dies before she does and she is completely fine with him cancelling the plan.
9. A letter from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1, dated 3 October 2011, informed the applicant of the following:
a. The only government administrative error found was he received automatic full spouse SBP coverage when he actually elected reduced spouse SBP coverage with his spouses concurrence.
b. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) was directed to correct his SBP election to spouse with a reduced base amount of $635, which was the threshold base amount on the effective date of his retirement.
c. Since his retirement was retroactive to 17 June 2006 he did not have the opportunity to terminate his SBP coverage between the 25th and 36th month following retirement.
d. He could apply to this Board for relief.
10. DFAS email, dated 26 April 2010, informed a staff member of this Board that the applicant was medically retired and placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL), effective 17 December 2006. The applicant was removed from the TDRL and placed on the permanent disability retired list on 1 September 2010. Their system reflected the effective date of SBP was 17 December 2006.
11. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. The member may elect not to participate (with their spouses concurrence, if required), but the election must be made before the first day for which the member is eligible to receive retired pay.
12. Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation. Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from SBP. The spouses concurrence is required. No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll. The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that by action of the PDBR in 2010 the applicant was medically retired, effective 16 June 2006, and he was placed on the TDRL on the following date.
2. The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 24 August 2010 and he elected to participate in SBP for spouse coverage at a reduced amount. His spouse concurred with his decision.
3. By law, the applicant had a 1-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which his retired pay started to withdraw from SBP. However, the applicant did not have the opportunity to terminate his SBP coverage between the 25th and 36th month following retirement since his retirement was retroactive to 17 June 2006.
4. Therefore, as a matter of equity it would be appropriate to amend the applicant's records to show he declined SBP participation, with his spouse's concurrence, within a timely manner and refund him any premiums paid.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he declined SBP participation with his spouse's concurrence in a timely manner; and
b. refunding him all SBP premiums paid.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021576
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021576
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009790
The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the Texas Army National Guard on 21 July 1980 in the rank and pay grade Private (PV1)/E-1, at the age of 20 years, 11 months and 29 days. By selecting this option, he elected to provide an immediate annuity beginning the day after his date of death, whether before or after age 60 for his spouse and child based on his full retired pay. In conjunction with the applicant's request for cancellation of participation in the SBP, his spouse provided a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014707
This letter notified the applicant that she had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record also shows she submitted a DD Form 2656 on 25 February 2009 wherein she elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. However, by law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029388
The spouse's signature MUST be notarized] of the DD Form 2656 is neither signed by his spouse to indicate her concurrence or non-concurrence with his election nor by a witness and/or retirement services officer. The evidence of record shows he retired on 13 July 2009 by reason of temporary disability. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007522
The applicant contends the DD Form 2656 that he completed on 27 October 2009 where he declined SBP spouse coverage should be honored and the SBP premiums refunded because both he and his spouse were present when he signed the document in the presence of an Army SBP counselor and notary public, respectively. The evidence of record confirms that on 27 October 2009, in his application for retired pay, the applicant declined to participate in SBP. The evidence shows that, for some period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018920
Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of the DD Form 2656 instructs the applicant that "SBP spouse concurrence is required when a member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement on 31 May 2010, the applicant and his wife elected to decline participation in the SBP with a notarized DD Form 2656, dated 30 March 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013220
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documentation in support of his request: * A notarized statement from his spouse, dated 7 April 2010 * A notarized letter requesting termination of the SBP signed by the applicant and his spouse, dated 7 April 2010 * A copy of a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 3 December 2004 * Copies of five dated letters to DFAS * Two facsimile (FAX)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008237
He also provided a sworn statement from his spouse concurring with termination of SBP coverage. As a result of the Sabo Agreement, dated 11 August 2011, the applicant's discharge in 2003 was revoked and he was retroactively placed on the TDRL in 2012 with an effective date of 11 December 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant timely completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016301
The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that he be reimbursed for any and all deductions from his retirement pay. His spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 19 May 2010, which is accepted as sufficient evidence to support her concurrence with his decision to cancel enrollment in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020233
She also states "I was not married to [Applicant] when in February 2006 when his election started." Although he previously provided a statement from his spouse who stated she was not married to the applicant in February 2006, the Complaint for Divorce indicated they were married on 28 August 2006, and his DD Form 2656 shows he married her on 25 April 1998 and at the time of his election on 14 February 2006 they were still married. In the absence of the primary document (i.e., the marriage...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017267
The applicant requests correction of her record to show that she and her spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 (and participate in SBP), to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Once she made the RCSBP election the premiums would have to be recovered from her retired pay...