BOARD DATE: 13 March 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021178
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his records go before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to lieutenant colonel (LTC).
2. The applicant states prior to his retirement in July 2000, he did not receive the proper retirement counseling. This led to him making a life-altering poor decision based on a lack of information regarding his promotion eligibility, high year tenure group, and his leadership and assignment potential. He requests the chance to be considered by an LTC promotion selection board since the opportunity was denied him by a lack of proper out-processing counseling [at the time of his retirement]. At no time during the process did any official, commander, or counselor explain to him that he would be meeting an LTC promotion board in approximately 1 year. This resulted in undue and avoidable harm to him and his career.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 2000.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. Having had prior service in the Regular Army and the U.S. Air Force, the applicant was appointed as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Medical Corps (MC) major (MAJ). He entered active duty on 12 August 1996.
3. He was honorably retired from active duty on 31 July 2000 in the rank of MAJ and placed on the Retired List on 1 August 2000. The DD Form 214 he received for this period of service shows he completed 3 years, 11 months, and 19 days of net active service during this period of service; and he had 16 years, 1 month, and 28 days of total prior active service, for a total of 20 years, 1 month, and 17 days of total creditable active service.
4. On 8 November 2002, he reentered active duty as a volunteer recall from the Retired List. He was honorably released from active duty on 7 November 2005.
5. On 14 April 2008, he again reentered active duty as a volunteer recall from the Retired List with a scheduled release from active duty date of 13 April 2012.
6. In the processing of this case, on 20 December 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Promotions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC). The advisory official recommended denial of the applicant's request for his records to go before an SSB for promotion consideration to LTC and opined the following:
a. The applicant was considered for promotion by the Fiscal Year 2000, LTC, MC, promotion selection board below the zone but he was not selected for promotion. He elected to separate from the service on 31 July 2000 after achieving sufficient time for retirement; therefore, he was ineligible for promotion consideration for future promotion selection boards.
b. Each military personnel message for a promotion board establishes clear guidance and instructions related to officers with approved separation dates and other eligibility criteria prior to the convene date of the board. Separations or actions completed outside the established limits of the instructions are not cause for reconsideration.
c. In addition, the applicant completed a DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist), dated 3 May 2000, wherein he indicated he (and his spouse) did not desire counseling on any services or benefits that were available on the checklist as part of his Individual Transition Plan prior to separation.
7. A response to the advisory opinion was received from the applicant on 1 February 2012. He stated:
a. The HRC opinion was made in the setting of today's Army with the free and easy information flow afforded by Army Knowledge Online. Today Soldiers are made aware of all pertinent points and requirements regarding promotion and assignments on a timely basis, but this was not the case in 2000. The DD Form 2648 does not have a heading related to promotion and continued service opportunities. Furthermore, the informal information he was given was on the "high three" rather than the final retirement system.
b. He received no counseling from his immediate or senior commanders regarding his exit or possible continuation of his military career. Each Soldier receives an exit interview with the commander prior to making a final decision but he did not receive an exit interview or counseling.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions) prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of active duty officers. Paragraph 7-2 of the regulation states SSBs may be convened under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 628, to consider or reconsider commissioned officers for promotion when Headquarters, Department of the Army discovers an officer was not considered from in or above the promotion zone by a regularly scheduled board because of administrative error.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-29, paragraph 7-11, states officers who discover that material error existed in their file at the time they were non-selected for promotion may request reconsideration through HRC. Reconsideration will normally not be granted when the error is minor or when the officer, by exercising reasonable care, could have detected and corrected the error. To determine if there is an error in the promotion file, the officer may request a copy of his/her file.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends his records should go before an SSB for promotion consideration to LTC because he did not receive the proper promotion and retirement counseling from any official, commander, or counselor during a
pre-separation briefing.
2. The applicant was a MAJ with over 20 years of active duty and even in 2000 there were many resources available to him to help him weigh the pros and cons of retirement. The decision whether to retire and when is a personal decision made by each Soldier when he/she achieves sufficient service for retirement. It is unrealistic to believe that if he had received promotion counseling in May 2000 or an exit briefing from his commander he would not have retired in July 2000. In addition, he had been considered for promotion below the zone by the Fiscal Year 2000 promotion board. Any reasonably diligent officer would have known he would have been considered for promotion again the following year. However, even if his contention that he did not receive counseling at that time was true, it does not constitute a material error.
3. The evidence of record shows he submitted a request for voluntary retirement after achieving sufficient service for retirement. There was no administrative or material error that caused him to not be considered for promotion by a regularly-scheduled promotion board. Rather, once his voluntary retirement was approved, he was no longer eligible for promotion consideration by a selection board.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting his requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021178
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021178
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015608
These orders stated, in part, "[Effective] on the date of entry on [active duty], you are appointed in the [Reserve grade] of CPT and placed on the ADL in the [grade] of CPT [in accordance with Army Regulation] 135-101 [Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Branches]." c. Service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, but not in the corps or professional specialty in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007885
Had the SSBs considered the 2002 adjustment from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), "his records would have been promotable." e. Army Regulation 600-8-29 states promotion selection boards will base their recommendations on impartial consideration of all officers and an SSB will consider the record of the officer as it should have been considered by the original board. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was initially considered for promotion by the FY05...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952
He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003972
The applicant requests promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the September 2005 Special Selection Board (SSB) with back pay and allowances and placement on the Retired List in the grade of LTC. However, despite being in the Retired Reserve, in 1993 he was considered for promotion to MAJ, but he was not selected. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Voiding Orders 08-036-00050, issued by Headquarters,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011327
e. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum, dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to MAJ effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. f. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum (Corrected Copy), dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to CPT effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. g. A promotion congratulations letter for the rank of MAJ. h. The following orders issued by Headquarters, USAR Command: (1) Orders Number T-12-721225,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008758
ILE constructive credit was never a requirement for him to be educationally qualified. The advisory official states HRC is not the authority to grant credit for military education - this is very misleading because they are the office that marks the file educationally qualified. Officers not educationally qualified will not be selected for promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005898
Because this regulatory degree requirement did not provide an exception for officers who were appointed to the rank of CPT before 1 October 1995, it failed to implement the baccalaureate degree exception that is required by Title 10, USC, section 12205(b)4. c. The SSB recommended him for promotion to MAJ and informed him that he had one of the following options depending on his current status: * if he had been discharged or retired, he could request voidance of the discharge or retirement...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011113
On 14 November 2013, in response to his petition to this Board for promotion consideration to LTC by an SSB, the Board granted him relief as follows: * submitting his records to an SSB for promotion consideration to LTC and if before promotion consideration he is removed from the RASL, correct his records by continuing the SSB * if selected for promotion, correct his records by voiding his removal from the RASL (retirement orders) and showing he met the eligibility criteria for promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004724
As a result, the applicant's record should be placed before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the criteria of all MAJ promotion boards that convened on or after 3 May 2001. As confirmed in the HRC advisory opinion the applicant was eligible for consideration for promotion to MAJ as soon as his promotion memorandum was issued on 3 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007116
As a result, they recently issued a corrected appointment memorandum awarding him 7 years, 4 months, and 1 day time in grade (TIG) upon his appointment as a chaplain 1LT. e. besides the error with the applicant's appointment rank, the applicant was wrongly not considered for promotion to CPT, MAJ, and LTC at the appropriate times and with the appropriate year groups. d. If before the SSB process is completed he is removed from the Reserve active status list: (1) Correct his records by...