Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004724
Original file (20120004724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120004724 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the effective date of his promotion to major (MAJ) be corrected to a date earlier than 2007.  

2.  The applicant states his time in grade, or promotion eligibility date (PED), for promotion to the next grade was not properly computed.  

3.  The applicant provides promotion orders to captain (CPT) and MAJ and transaction history messages in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The record shows the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve on 13 December 1985 with a follow on appointment in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 27 January 1986.  

2.  In a memorandum dated 3 May 2001, the applicant was promoted to CPT effective 2 November 2000 with a date of rank of 11 December 1992.

3.  The applicant was promoted to MAJ on 13 June 2007.

4.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC).  This HRC official states the applicant’s promotion to MAJ on 13 June 2007 was based on the selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 MAJ Army Promotion List (APL) and meeting the existing regulatory requirements for promotion.  However, under the rules that existed prior to the implementation of the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) under which the applicant was eligible to compete for promotion to MAJ, he was eligible to be boarded for consideration for promotion to MAJ immediately following his promotion to CPT on 3 May 2001.  As a result, the applicant's record should be placed before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the criteria of all MAJ promotion boards that convened on or after 3 May 2001.  If selected for and promoted to MAJ on an earlier date by the SSB, he should also be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by an SSB based on the promotion eligibility date (PED) established based on the earlier promotion to MAJ.

5.  On 1 May 2012, the applicant concurred with the recommendations of the HRC advisory opinion.  

6.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers (WO) Other Than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned WO's) of the ARNG of the United States (ARNGUS) and of commissioned and WO's of the U.S. Army Reserve.  Paragraph 4-11 contains eligibility requirements for promotion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for consideration of a promotion effective date to MAJ prior to 2007 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  As confirmed in the HRC advisory opinion the applicant was eligible for consideration for promotion to MAJ as soon as his promotion memorandum was issued on 3 May 2001.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to place his record before an SSB for promotion consideration to MAJ under the criteria of every promotion selection board he was eligible for subsequent to 3 May 2001 and prior to the convening date of the FY 2007 MAJ promotion board.  

2.  If selected for promotion by an SSB the applicant's MAJ promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly.  Further, if selected for promotion to MAJ under an earlier criteria and his DOR assignment renders him eligible for promotion consideration to LTC his record should be placed before an SSB for consideration for promotion to LTC under the criteria of any promotion selection board his new MAJ DOR makes him eligible for. 

3.  In addition, if the applicant is selected for an earlier MAJ promotion date and/or selected for LTC by an SSB he should be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result of these promotions. 
BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  placing the applicant’s record before an SSB for consideration for promotion to MAJ under the criteria of any promotion selection board he was eligible for subsequent to 3 May 2001 and prior to the FY 2007 MAJ promotion board;
   
   b.  if selected for promotion to MAJ by an SSB, establish his promotion effective date and DOR based on the earlier promotion selection board criteria he was selected under; 
   
   c.  If promoted to MAJ with an earlier promotion date that renders him eligible for promotion consideration to LTC, place his record before an SSB for consideration for promotion to LTC under the criteria of all promotion selection boards for which he would have been eligible; 
   
   d.  if selected for promotion to LTC by an SSB, establish his LTC promotion effective date and DOR based on the criteria under which he was selected; and 
   
   e.  if selected for promotion to MAJ and/or LTC by an SSB he should be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004724



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120004724



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006343

    Original file (20110006343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD), from 31 August 2016 to 30 November 2019 * adjustment of his date of rank (DOR), from 17 December 2000 to 31 March 2004 2. The applicant states, in effect: a. he was reappointed and promoted in accordance with the provisions of the Wxxxxx lawsuit (Settlement Agreement, Lxxxx J. Wxxxxx vs. Fxxxxxx J. Hxxxxx, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, U.S. District Court for the Western District of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020952

    Original file (20120020952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed in the Retired Reserve after being twice non-selected for promotion to LTC only 4 years after being promoted to MAJ. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers) specifies that MAJ to LTC mandatory boards occur when an officer reaches 7 years TIG. d. ABCMR Docket Number AR20060014854, dated 17 January 2007, pertaining to his selection to MAJ by the SSB 2005SS12R7 adjourning on 4 November 2005 indicates the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007083

    Original file (20120007083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the "1994" (i.e., 1996) nonselection letter be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) be restored to 1996 * his DOR to major (MAJ) be adjusted * he be promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC) * any non-mandatory education requirements such as the Command and General Staff Officers Course (CGSOC) be waived for promotion to LTC, if necessary 2. His records contain a memorandum, dated 1 March 1996, issued by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011090

    Original file (20090011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, while there is no basis upon which to authorize an adjustment of the applicant’s DOR at this time, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration by the FY 1994, 1995, and 1996 RCSBs, as confirmed in the HRC-St. Louis advisory opinion. If the SSB selects the applicant for promotion to CPT under an earlier criteria, her CPT promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026100

    Original file (20100026100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, * education waivers with consecutive promotion corrections due to the findings of Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20070001144, dated 2 August 2007 * a 4-year extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to allow him to qualify for a 20-year nonregular retirement 2. On 2 August 2007, the ABCMR granted his request for correction of his records as follows: * determined his 19 April 1996 DA Form 5074-1-R was incorrect *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011327

    Original file (20130011327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum, dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to MAJ effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. f. A Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army memorandum (Corrected Copy), dated 19 May 1997, promoting him to CPT effective 1 June 1997 with a DOR of 29 June 1991. g. A promotion congratulations letter for the rank of MAJ. h. The following orders issued by Headquarters, USAR Command: (1) Orders Number T-12-721225,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019716

    Original file (20080019716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This HRC-St. Louis promotion official stated that the applicant was REFRAD and transferred to the USAR on 12 May 1999, prior to his promotion eligibility date (PED). The HRC-St. Louis, Chief, Special Actions Branch, Office of Promotions, RC, further states that had the applicant been assigned to a higher graded position upon his 12 May 1999 discharge from the RA and transferred to the USAR he would have been eligible for promotion to CPT on his PED of 1 July 1999, or had he remained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015608

    Original file (20130015608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    These orders stated, in part, "[Effective] on the date of entry on [active duty], you are appointed in the [Reserve grade] of CPT and placed on the ADL in the [grade] of CPT [in accordance with Army Regulation] 135-101 [Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Branches]." c. Service on active duty or in an active status as a commissioned officer in any of the Uniformed Services, but not in the corps or professional specialty in which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000543

    Original file (20130000543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the applicant's appointment grade and DOR had been correct he would have been considered for below zone promotion at the FY 2010, LTC, ARNGUS, AR AGR, and AR Non-AGR Chaplain Corps Promotion Selection Boards, Competitive Categories. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve - Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) states SSBs will not consider officers for below the zone promotion. As a result, the Board recommends...