Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020752
Original file (20110020752.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020752 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he was issued a CIB but he cannot recall there being orders cut; therefore, he desires orders to be published awarding him the CIB. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in Des Moines, Iowa on 20 April 1970.  He completed his basic training and his advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Lewis, Washington and was transferred to Vietnam on 13 September 1970.

3.  He was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment for duty as a rifleman.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 15 December 1970.

4.  He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service and he was awarded the Air Medal and the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 8 September 1971 for assignment to Fort Ord, California where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) to attend school on 10 December 1971.  He had served 1 year, 7 months and 21 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Air Medal and the Army Commendation Medal. 

6.  A review of his official records failed to show any indication that he was awarded the CIB or any evidence to show that he engaged the enemy in combat.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was issued a CIB is not in doubt, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record fails to show that such was the case. 

2.  There is also no evidence to show the applicant engaged in combat with the enemy while serving in such a capacity.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request for award of the CIB.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020752





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020752



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018280

    Original file (20110018280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Although the applicant's record is void of specific evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his unit in the RVN, it does confirm he served as an infantryman in MOS 11B with a qualifying infantry unit during his tour of duty in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018130

    Original file (20100018130.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Although the evidence of record shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam, his record is void of any evidence that shows he was personally present and participated with the unit while it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021090

    Original file (20120021090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 11 April 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit, but the individual must have been present and participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023762

    Original file (20110023762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to grant his request for award of the CIB. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003268

    Original file (20080003268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). A review of the available record failed to produce an order awarding him the CIB or any evidence to show that he engaged the enemy in ground combat while assigned to his infantry company in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and showing his award of the BSM on his records as well.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016508

    Original file (20140016508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, his military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence of record shows he served in an infantry MOS with an infantry unit of regimental size, there is insufficient evidence to show he was personally present and engaged in active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001565

    Original file (20120001565.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB for the period 9 March 1970 through 1 February 1971; and b. adding the CIB to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 March 1975. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120001565 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002115

    Original file (20080002115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 August 1970, General Orders Number 824, issued by United States Army Support Command – QUI NHON awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for the period of September 1969 to August 1970. A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was awarded the CIB or that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned as an infantryman to an infantry unit in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017097

    Original file (20110017097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Vietnam Combat Certificate provided by the applicant with his application simply states that the applicant served with a unit of the 1st Cavalry Division for the period of 5 March to 13 April 1970. Therefore, in the absence of orders or sufficient evidence to show that he met the requirements for award of the CIB during his brief 38 days in Vietnam there appears to be no basis to grant his request to add the award of the CIB to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board determined that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011109

    Original file (20140011109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 March 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140011109 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A review of the available records show the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and there is no evidence showing he was awarded the CIB or that he personally engaged the enemy in active ground combat. Therefore, absent evidence to show he actually engaged the enemy in combat there appears to be no basis for granting his request.