Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020633
Original file (20110020633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020633 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. 

2.  He states while serving in Vietnam, he was firing a .50 caliber machine gun because enemy forces had been observed in the area of operation. The machine gun jammed and the ammunition started exploding inside the weapon.  As a result, he suffered fragment wounds to both his thighs and was medically evacuated to a military hospital in Saigon where he received medical treatment. 

3.  He adds that his records clearly show he served in Vietnam and was injured while serving there.  He has been unable to find any records to completely substantiate his claim.  However, he knows what happened and hopefully the Board can obtain evidence to clear up any discrepancies and award him the Purple Heart. 

4.  The applicant provides documents from his military medical record. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted in the Army on 16 May 1966.  Upon completion of training, he served in military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 20 October 1966 to 17 October 1967
* item 40 (Wounds) – no entry
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – no award of the Purple Heart 

4.  The applicant provided copies of the following medical documents, which are all dated subsequent to his return from Vietnam.  These forms show he sustained shrapnel injuries to both legs which had caused him pain since his return from Vietnam.  None of the documents show his injuries were a result of hostile action:

* A Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care)
* A DA Form 8-274 (Medical Condition – Physical Profile Record)
* An SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination) 
* An SF 89 (Report of Medical History)  

5.  On 15 May 1968, he was honorably released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he completed 2 years of active duty service and 11 months and 28 days of foreign service in Vietnam. 

6.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record.

2.  By regulation, it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded as a result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment of the wound must have been made a matter of official record in order to award the Purple Heart.  

3.  While he provides documents from his military medical record which show he suffered injuries to both legs while serving in Vietnam, he has not provided sufficient medical evidence which shows his injuries were a result of hostile action.  

4.  The veracity of the applicant’s claim that he sustained fragment wounds to both thighs while firing a .50 caliber machine gun is not in question.  However, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case in that the enemy did not cause the malfunction..  

5.  As such, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.  

6.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020633





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020633



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025817

    Original file (20100025817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim for the Purple Heart, he provided service medical records which show he was treated for a right leg wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the service medical records provided by the applicant state "old shrapnel wound" to right calf, there is insufficient evidence to show he was injured as a result of enemy action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002665

    Original file (20120002665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a document titled "Log Number 3491" that shows the applicant suffered multiple fragment wounds to his left leg on 25 July 1970 and the entry: Cleaning up detail in front of bunker burning grass when some type of explosive was set off (possibly a cook off) - investigation 5. The DA Form 20 is a record of the applicant's history in the Army and an entry for wounds received would not normally be made on this document without orders or a casualty report. Notwithstanding his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016404C070206

    Original file (20050016404C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster. The applicant states he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 9 January 1966, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013747

    Original file (20090013747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The notarized statement from Michael M____ states that he was a member of the same platoon and was present on 21 November 1968 when the applicant sustained a wound to the right thigh from enemy fire. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against the enemy or as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016522

    Original file (20070016522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The case was considered by the Board as AR2003093948. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as the result of hostile action on 19 October 1967 and by showing that is authorized to wear four bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071468C070402

    Original file (2002071468C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant’s request. NOTE : The ARBA Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088456C070403

    Original file (2003088456C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 June 1965. The records failed to show the applicant was authorized award of the PH; there was no documentation in unit records to show his wounding, nor were there unit orders to show that he was awarded the PH. It would now be appropriate to administratively correct his record to show these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021041

    Original file (20110021041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with the 1st Battalion, 14th Infantry, his unit was cited for awards of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for service from 1 August 1967 to 17 November 1970, based on DA General Orders Number 52, dated 1971 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation, for service from 1 August 1967 to 31 October 1969,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017793

    Original file (20130017793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam from 8 June 1969 to 11 January 1970. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.