Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003602
Original file (20110003602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  11 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110003602 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change her name from "T____ M____ H____ IV" to "R____ I____ A____."

2.  She states she legally changed her name after undergoing gender reassignment and it is embarrassing to have a male name reflected on her DD Form 214 or past Department of Veterans Affairs record.

3.  She provides a judgment of name change, medical certificate, certification of her doctor's registration with the Medical Council of Thailand, and her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A review of the applicant's official military personnel file shows she enlisted and served in the Regular Army under the name "T____ M____ H____ IV."  She was honorably released from active duty on 20 December 1991 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete her service obligation.  She was honorably discharged from the USAR on 20 August 1996, also under the name "T____ M____ H____ IV."

3.  Item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle) of her DD Form 214 shows the entry "H____, T____ M____ IV."

4.  She provides:

* a judgment of name change showing a court granted her petition to change her name from "T____ M____ H____ IV" to "R____ I____ A____" on 10 January 2008
* a medical certificate showing she underwent gender reassignment surgery in Thailand on 13 January 2009

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant only used the name "T____ M____ H____ IV" during her period of Army service and changed her name to "R____ I____ A____" many years after she was discharged.

2.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to record her current name in her military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army's records at this late date.

3.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided will be filed in her official military personnel file.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the name she used during her military service and the name she currently uses.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003602





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110003602



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004596

    Original file (20150004596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A memorandum authored by COL C____ T___ to MG D____ B. A____, subject: Request for GOMOR, dated 11 July 2011, that shows he requested a GOMOR be issued to the applicant based on an incident on 26 June 2011, in which the applicant was involved in a verbal argument with his (the applicant's spouse) that turned physical when he grabbed her by the neck to prevent her from walking away from him. (1) It shows the rating chain as: * Rater: CW2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006426

    Original file (20140006426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Did the applicant sexually harass any Soldier during the 4 September 2012 and 11 October 2012 incidents in question? The applicant did not sexually harass any Soldier during the 4 September 2012 and 11 October 2012 incidents in question. On 15 November 2012, MG S____ W. S____, Commanding General, 335th Signal Command (Theater) (Provisional), requested delegation of authority to dispose of the applicant's misconduct case wherein he stated an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004851

    Original file (20150004851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a court order. His records are void of documentation showing he served in the Army under any name other than the name listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant's military service records show he enlisted, served, and was discharged under the name that is listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002514

    Original file (20150002514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. Former PVT D____ R____ claimed she was sexually harassed by the applicant's licking and biting of his lips. The evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the finding of guilty of violating Army regulations by wrongfully touching and sexually harassing trainees. On 18 February 2014, the Office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army, Criminal Law Division, Washington, DC, notified the applicant that: * his record of trial contained sufficient legal and competent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020133

    Original file (20110020133.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006786

    Original file (20140006786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states an AR 15-6 investigation was conducted about the command climate of the applicant's unit. Headquarters, 8th TSC, Fort Shafter, HI, memorandum, dated 27 April 2011, subject: AR 15-6 Investigation Appointment, shows COL B____ A____ was appointed as an IO by MG M____ J. T____, CG, 8th TSC, to conduct an informal AR 15-6 investigation into the command climate within the 45th SBDE command group, and an assessment of the relationship between the Brigade Commander, her brigade...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012798

    Original file (20140012798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also shows the applicant was to be discharged from the service with an honorable characterization of service; the authority for separation was the message, dated 13 March 2014, subject: Officer Elimination Case, and AR 600-8-24, paragraph 4-2b, for misconduct and moral or professional dereliction of duty; and the SPD Code to be issued was "JNC." This review reveals, in pertinent part, the following individuals testified: * Lieutenant Colonel S____ D. B____, Commander, 369th Signal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009844

    Original file (20120009844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests approval to transfer 1 month of her educational benefits to two additional dependent children, J____ M____ and A____ M____, under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 April 2010. It is apparent she was aware of the requirement to request TEB through the DOD TEB online database prior to her transfer to the Retired Reserve as she transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000135

    Original file (20130000135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130000135 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her name and gender change. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130000135 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130000135 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016314

    Original file (20140016314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his DD Form 214 shows his name as "R____ M____ H____." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the name on his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the name that is listed on his DD Form 4/1. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.