Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019772
Original file (20110019772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019772 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states his award of the BSM was not added to his
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his BSM Certificate and citation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s official records, though somewhat incomplete, show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States in San Juan, Puerto Rico on
24 October 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, SC and his advanced individual training as an infantry indirect fire crewman at Fort Gordon, GA before being transferred to Vietnam on 2 May 1969 for assignment to Company D, 2d Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division.

3.  On 8 June 1969, he was wounded in action (fragmentation wounds to the head) and he was medically evacuated to the 249th General Hospital in Japan.  He was subsequently transferred to the Naval Hospital in St. Albans, NY and then to the Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital in San Juan, Puerto Rico, where he remained until he was retired on 1 October 1969 by reason of permanent disability.  He completed 11 months and 13 days of total active service.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his retirement does not show award of the BSM.

5.  A review of the applicant’s available records failed to contain orders awarding him the BSM.  Additionally, review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the BSM pertaining to the applicant.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service not involving participation in aerial flight in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam is not in question, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide the required evidence in the form of orders awarding him the BSM to support his claim.


2.  In the absence of orders to show he was awarded the BSM there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant’s requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________XXX____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019772



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019772



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000844

    Original file (20100000844.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be issued a new Purple Heart Certificate reflecting his correct social security account number (SSAN). Accordingly, he should be issued a new Purple Heart Certificate reflecting his correct SSAN and his Purple Heart orders should be corrected to reflect his correct SSAN. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016432

    Original file (20070016432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. In pertinent part, it provides that a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022535

    Original file (20110022535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was commissioned through the State Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 25 August 2009 * his NGB Form 0122E (Special Orders Number 255 AR), dated 19 October 2011, shows his initial appointment effective date as 4 March 2011 * his Federal Recognition packet was never submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB); therefore he was not given his Federal Recognition * 16 months after asking about his promotion to first lieutenant (1LT), he discovered he had never received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002263

    Original file (20130002263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 7a (Place of Entry on Active Duty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 December 2008 to read "Fort Hood, Texas." The DD Form 214 is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. His DD Form 214 should not be corrected to show he entered active duty at Fort Hood, Texas.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006672C070205

    Original file (20060006672C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s medical records were not available for review by the Board. The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was wounded/injured in action against the enemy, that the injury required medical treatment, and that the treatment was made a matter of record. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008621

    Original file (20100008621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The applicant’s court document shows his name was changed from L______ Perez to M_____ R____ Perez on 24 June 1952, subsequent to his separation date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016161

    Original file (20140016161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of – * a 31 October 1970 physical profile * a 31 January 1971 pay voucher * a 30 December 1971 inquiry to the National Personnel Center by his mother * a 29 March 1972 request for information reply * five letters from the American Red Cross (in Spanish), 14 January 1971, 21 October 1971, 14 December 1971, 16 December 1971, and 19 September 1972 * U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Buchanan Special Orders Number 22, dated 31 January 1975 * 3 February 1975 request for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016245

    Original file (AR20080016245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the ARNGUS and PRARNG for a period of 6 years on 12 January 1972 and was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 25 May 1972. The evidence of record shows that, on 13 July 2007, orders were issued that discharged the applicant from the ARNGUS and PRARNG on 13 May 2007 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 14 May 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016219

    Original file (20110016219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was born in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico, that his last duty assignment was Company A, 4th Battalion, 196th Light Infantry Brigade, Americal Division, that his military occupational specialty (MOS) is 11B4O and that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). A review of the applicant's records shows the applicant had "excellent" conduct and efficiency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002611

    Original file (20080002611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant had 183 of those days in a 10 U.S.C. COTTAD requests will not exceed the maximum number of days authorized under the mobilization order. Evidence shows that the applicant was involuntarily mobilized for 1010 days during the periods 14 February 2003 through 13 August 2004 and 25 August 2005 through 30 November 2006.