Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018815
Original file (20110018815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
       IN THE CASE OF: 

       BOARD DATE:     3 April 2012

       DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018815 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents 
provided, if any). 

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). 

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 

1.  The applicant requests: 

* correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)
* he be provided a copy of his DD Form 214 which shows the 
characterization of his discharge 

2.  The applicant states: 

* he was awarded the ARCOM on 8 June 1990 and it is not listed on his 
DD Form 214
* his bottom portion (Special Additional Information) of his DD Form 214 is 
missing 
* he was on terminal leave at the end of his service and believes these 
items were never updated on his DD Form 214 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 4980-14 (ARCOM Certificate)
* DD Form 2l4
* Honorable Discharge Certificate 



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute 
of limitations for timely filing. 

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 April 1983. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 24C (Hawk Firing Section Mechanic). The highest rank/grade he attained while on active duty was sergeant/E-5. 

3.  The record shows the applicant was issued a duly constituted DD Form 214. 
The DD Form 214 is an 8-part form in which separating members are given 
Copies 1 and 4; Copies 2, 7, and 8 are kept with the Service; Copy 5 is given to 
the Department of Labor, and Copy 6 is given to the Department of Veterans 
Affairs. 

     a.  Copy 1 does not contain the Special Additional Information such as the type of separation, character of service, separation authority, separation code, narrative reason for separation, separation code, reentry code, dates of time lost, and initials of the separating member requesting Copy 4.  Copy 4 contains the Special Additional Information. 

     b.  The applicant can obtain a certified copy of his DD Form 214 by writing to the National Personnel Records Center, Military Personnel Records, I Archives Drive, St. Louis, MO 63138. Therefore, this issue will not be discussed further in these proceedings. 

4.  The applicant provides a copy of his ARCOM certificate awarded for the period 4 April 1983 to 20 July 1990.  The certificate shows Permanent Orders Number 23-I announced award of the ARCOM.  Additionally, records show the applicant was assigned to 3d Battalion, 1st Air Defense Artillery, Fort Hood, TX, during the period of award of the ARCOM. 
 


5.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons 
Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the 
ARCOM. 

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 20 July 1990 for expiration of term of service.  He completed 7 years, 3 months, and 16 days of active military service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.
 
8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 

1.  The applicant’s request for award of the ARCOM was carefully considered and determined to have merit. 

2.  Although the permanent order awarding the applicant is unavailable, his 
ARCOM certificate correctly shows the order number announcing the award. 
The ARCOM is presumed to be an end of service award.  Therefore, any doubt 
should be in favor of the applicant.  The applicant is entitled to award of the 
ARCOM and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. 

BOARD VOTE:
___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 
________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 
________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Commendation Medal to item 13 of the applicant’s DD Form 
214.




       __________X__________
                CHAIRPERSON
       
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018815



2




ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012245

    Original file (20100012245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 8 January 1991 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and the "ARCON Medal" [presumed to be the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM)]. However, his military personnel file does not contain a copy of the certificate or orders awarding him the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001593

    Original file (20140001593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his second award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM 2nd Award). The certificate provided by the applicant shows he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period 24 October 1990 – 14 August 1999 in Permanent Orders Number 111-005, issued by Headquarters, 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026198

    Original file (20100026198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 September 1990 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). However, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001184

    Original file (20120001184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Army Achievement Medal (AAM) * he served with the 82d Airborne Division 2. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the ARCOM or AAM. However, the evidence clearly shows his last duty assignment was with Company A, 2d Battalion, 87th Infantry Regiment, 8th Infantry Division and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010934

    Original file (20080010934.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also indicates that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and Enlisted Records Brief (ERB) clearly document these awards, and the DA Form 638 is the official orders for the second ARCOM, and as a result, it is unjust not to correct his record reflect these earned and previously issued awards. The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1), which was prepared on 28 April 2004, includes an entry in Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns), which shows the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015142

    Original file (20090015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and two additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record contains orders that support two awards of the AAM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was awarded a third award of the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020372

    Original file (20090020372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he earned the BSM during the Gulf War because of his service and he should have three awards of the ARCOM reflected in his records. However, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and documents submitted with his application that he was in fact awarded those awards. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001393

    Original file (20090001393.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) (4th Award). The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM with 1st OLC in December 1983 and a retirement ARCOM with 3rd OLC in October 1986. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to add the ARCOM with 3rd OLC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015258

    Original file (20080015258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued upon retirement shows, in part, he was awarded the ARCOM (Fifth OLC) and the AAM (Third OLC). The orders contained in the applicant's military records show that he was awarded three AAMs, seven ARCOMs, and one MSM. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003423

    Original file (20110003423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (3d Oak Leaf Cluster), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (3d Award), Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) (1st Award), and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) or Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for Operation Golden Pheasant. The evidence of record does not show the applicant served in a unit during a period for which the unit received...