Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026198
Original file (20100026198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026198 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 September 1990 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM).

2.  The applicant states:

* he was awarded the ARCOM on 13 September 1990
* he was awarded the AAM in 1994 while he was in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)

3.  The applicant provides:

* an ARCOM award certificate
* an AAM award certificate

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 


justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 October 1986.  He completed his training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 96D (imagery analyst).  On 4 September 1990, he was honorably released from active duty under the early transition program and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the ARCOM or AAM as authorized awards.

4.  He provided an ARCOM award certificate for meritorious service during the period 8 July 1987 to 21 October 1990, dated 13 September 1990.  However, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records.

5.  He provided an AAM award certificate for meritorious achievement during the period 18 July to 26 August 1994, dated 27 August 1994.  It shows he was awarded the AAM by Permanent Orders 41-10, dated 27 August 1994.

6.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 6 November 2003.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the AAM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the
DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no orders for the ARCOM in the available records and the applicant did not provide any orders for the ARCOM.  In the absence of orders officially awarding him the ARCOM or any other official corroborating evidence, the award certificate provided by the applicant is not sufficient in itself as a basis for adding the ARCOM to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 September 1990.

2.  The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his release from active duty.  Orders show he received the AAM in 1994, four years after his release from active duty.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request to show this medal on his
DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 September 1990.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION 

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026198



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026198



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009789

    Original file (20130009789.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 October 1994 to show the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and her subsequent U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service and awards. The applicant provides and her record contains: a. DD Form 214 that shows she served honorably on active duty for training for the period 23 June 1994 to 13 October 1994. However, evidence shows the applicant completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003771

    Original file (20130003771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his awards of the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (second award), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with four oak leaf clusters (OLCs), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) with four OLCs, Italian Parachutist Badge, and completion of the psychological operations specialist course and Basic Haitian Creole course. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not properly reflect his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019071

    Original file (20110019071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 October 2006 to show the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (6th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. Her record contains two orders and she provided two additional orders showing she was awarded a total of four ARCOMs. Her record also contains...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026727

    Original file (20100026727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there are no orders in his records and he has no orders showing more than three awards of the AAM. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023481

    Original file (20100023481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 June 1999 to show the: * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NPDR) with Numeral "2" * United Nations Medal (UNM) for the United Nations Operation in Somalia (UNOSOM) * Senior Aircraft Crew Member Badge [now called the Senior Aviation Badge] * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) with one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013274

    Original file (20100013274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and certificates showing he was awarded the AM, ARCOM, AAM, and AGCM. Based on this evidence of record, the applicant is entitled to correction of his record to show award of the SWASM with three bronze service stars, KLM-SA, and the KLM-KU. While the applicant's records do not contain orders for the AGCM, the applicant was awarded the AM, ARCOM, and AAM for meritorious achievement, he was promoted to pay grade E-5, and there is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013767

    Original file (20140013767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded or recommended for the ARCOM. He adds that he does not know why the award recommendation was never forwarded to the approval authority. He adds he submitted the award recommendation in good faith, but does not know why the award recommendation was never forwarded to the approval authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002399

    Original file (20090002399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect award of the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 4th Award, and Army Achievement Medal (AAM) 4th Award. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 13 of her DD Form 214 does not reflect her award of the ICM, ARCOM (4th Award), or AAM (4th Award). Therefore, it would be appropriate to add 1 bronze service star to her ICM and to correct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010771

    Original file (20100010771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states there are a number of awards he received while serving on active duty that are not listed on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s record shows he served in Southwest Asia (SWA) in support of Operation Vigilant Warrior from 28 October through 22 November 1994. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003907

    Original file (20140003907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a NATO Certificate which shows he was awarded the NATO Medal for service with NATO in operations in relation to the former Republic of Yugoslavia during the period 16 January 1996 to 1 October 1996. Based on the applicant's service in Bosnia from 16 January 1996 to 1 October 1996, he is authorized award of the NATO Medal and correction of item 18 of his DD Form 214 to show this deployment. Based on his service in SWA from 1 October 1997 to 31 December 1997, he is authorized...