Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017569
Original file (20110017569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017569 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests Special Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 4 April 2007, be removed from the performance section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states the order is located on both his performance fiche and restricted fiche of his OMPF.  Since this is a duplication, he would like the copy on his performance fiche removed.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the order.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army staff sergeant.

2.  Special Court-Martial Order Number 2, Headquarters, U.S. Army Southern Europe Task Force, dated 4 April 2007, shows that, on 7 February 2007, the applicant, a staff sergeant, was convicted of dereliction in the performance of his duties, and making a false official statement.  He was sentenced to be reduced to E-4 and to be confined for 4 months.  On 4 April 2007, the convening authority approved the sentence.  This order is filed on the applicant's performance fiche.


3.  General Court-Martial Order Number 3, Headquarters, U.S. Army Southern Europe Task Force, dated 16 May 2007, shows that, on 3 August 2006, the applicant was charged with:

* stealing a laptop computer
* stealing mail matter
* dereliction of duty
* two specifications of false official statement
* wrongful receipt of stolen property
* assault on a commissioned officer

It also shows the proceedings were terminated and the charges and specifications were dismissed by the convening authority on 11 August 2006.  This order is filed on the applicant's restricted fiche.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the OMPF.  Table 2-1 of this Army regulation states court-martial orders will be filed in the performance fiche when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification.  If all approved findings are not guilty, file the order on the restricted fiche.  If all charges and specifications are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed, remove all related orders from the performance fiche and transfer them to the restricted fiche.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant claims that only one court-martial order is filed in two locations in his OMPF; he requests the copy of the order filed on his performance fiche be removed.

2.  There are two separate court-martial orders in the applicant's OMPF.  Special Court-Martial Order Number 2 reflects a guilty finding and is appropriately filed on the performance fiche.  General Court-Martial Order Number 3 reflects the proceedings were terminated and all charges and specifications were dismissed. This order is appropriately filed on the applicant's restricted fiche.

3.  All court-martial orders are correctly filed; the applicant's request cannot be approved.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017569





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017569



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013467

    Original file (20070013467.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a self-authored letter, dated 15 September 2007; a copy of General Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 5 January 2001; and two letters of recommendation from his battalion commander and battalion command sergeant major (CSM), in support of his application. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that General Court-Martial Orders are filed on the P fiche when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011864

    Original file (20120011864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his court-martial record: * be removed from his Official Military Personnel Record (OMPF), or * be transferred from his performance (P) fiche to his Restricted (R) fiche 2. The applicant has done that.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007674C070206

    Original file (20050007674C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Headquarters, United States Army Communications Electronics Command and Fort Monmouth, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey General Court-Martial (GCM) Orders Number (#) 1, dated 22 November 2002 be removed from, or transferred to the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant’s request to remove the GCM orders in question from his OMPF, or to transfer them to the R-Fiche of his OMPF, and the supporting documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014004C070205

    Original file (20060014004C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant was convicted pursuant to his pleas of guilty to the specifications charged and the special court-martial order was properly filed on the performance fiche of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012108C070206

    Original file (20050012108C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a Special Court-Martial Order from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The OMPF Online: My Records page shows that the court- martial order is listed as being filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF. Evidence of record shows that the court-martial order in question is properly filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010350C070206

    Original file (20050010350C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Delia R. Trimble | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests in effect, removal or placement into his restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) of Headquarters, United States Army Communications Electronics Command and Fort Monmouth, Fort Monmouth, New Jersey General Court-Martial Orders Number (#) 1, dated 22 November 2002. The applicant’s request to remove the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006741

    Original file (20120006741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of his summary court-martial from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transfer to the restricted section of his OMPF. The applicant provides two statements of support. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, evaluation periods, and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020073

    Original file (20100020073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 2004, he was promoted to the rank/grade of captain/O-3 in the USAR as a military intelligence (MI) officer. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013292

    Original file (20140013292 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings on Nonjudicial Punishment (NJP) under Article 15) and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He contended that the evidence contained in the AR 15-6 investigation shows that the applicant was not derelict in the performance of his duties and contended that the NJP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013292

    Original file (20140013292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings on Nonjudicial Punishment (NJP) under Article 15) and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He contended that the evidence contained in the AR 15-6 investigation shows that the applicant was not derelict in the performance of his duties and contended that the NJP...