Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006741
Original file (20120006741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120006741 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of his summary court-martial from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transfer to the restricted section of his OMPF.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He believes the record is unjust because the events were not as stated.  Since the imposition of the administrative measures that were taken, a total of 56 months has elapsed.  During that time, he has accepted and served his punishment with a positive attitude while working toward getting his career back on track and serving in the Army with honor and dignity.  As his evaluations indicate, his performance has been progressive and consistent as his level of responsibility has increased.  

	b.  He wants the opportunity to continue to faithfully and selflessly serve our Soldiers and the Army because he knows he has much to offer this great organization.  Moving this record from the performance section of his OMPF to the restricted section affords him that opportunity.

3.  The applicant provides two statements of support.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 May 1997 and he holds military occupational specialty 92F (Petroleum Supply Specialist).  He was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant (SSG) on 1 May 2004.
2.  He was assigned to Company A, 115th Brigade Support Battalion, 1st Brigade Combat Team, Camp Taji, Iraq.

3.  The performance section of his OMPF contains a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 15 February 2007, and DD Form 2329 (Record of Trial by Summary Court-Martial), dated 3 May 2007, wherein they show he was:

* found guilty by a summary court-martial in Iraq of one specification of disobeying a commissioned officer
* found guilty of two specifications of disobeying lawful orders
* found guilty of one specification of soliciting another Soldier to commit an indecent act 
* found not guilty of two specifications of using indecent language
* sentenced to reduction in rank/grade to sergeant (SGT)/E-5

4.  On 3 May 2007, the convening authority approved the sentence and ordered it executed.  The applicant was subsequently reduced to the rank of SGT.

5.  A legal review of the summary court-martial, dated 25 May 2007, found the sentence imposed and the record of trial to be legally sufficient.

6.  On 1 December 2008, the applicant was again promoted to the rank of SSG.  He is assigned to the 615th Aviation Support Battalion, 1st Air Calvary Brigade, Fort Hood, TX.

7.  The applicant provides two statements, dated 25 and 26 December 2011, wherein his battalion commander and command sergeant major stated the applicant is a superior noncommissioned officer, a total professional with outstanding leadership skills, and a valuable asset to the unit and the Army.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides the principles of support, standards of service, policies, tasks, rules, and steps governing all work required to support maintaining the OMPF.  Chapter 2 provides detailed guidance and instructions with regard to the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF.  Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) shows:

* records of trial by summary court-martial are filed in the performance section when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification 
* this form will be filed together with the charge sheet and letter of legal review
* if all approved findings are not guilty, then file in the restricted section of the OMPF
* if all charges and specifications are later dismissed or if all findings of guilty have been reversed in a supplemental action, remove all related documents from the performance section of the OMPF and transfer to the restricted section

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's trial by a summary court-martial was warranted by the nature of the offenses charged.  His conviction and sentence were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations.  As required by the applicable regulation, the court-martial was filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

2.  The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier.  In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, evaluation periods, and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.

3.  The summary court-martial order the applicant received is properly filed in his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006741



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120006741



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003083

    Original file (20120003083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests a general court-martial order be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004617

    Original file (20090004617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to have a special court-martial order moved from the performance section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) to the restricted section of his OMPF. This Army regulation also states that documents authorized for filing in the restricted section are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, evaluation periods, and corrections to other parts of the OMPF. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005900

    Original file (20120005900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120005900 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests transfer of summary court-martial (SCM) documents from the performance to the restricted section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was considered for promotion (below the zone) by the FY12 SFC Promotion Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009211

    Original file (20150009211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * statement from his battalion commander * statement from his brigade commander * General Court-Martial Order Number 44, dated 26 October 2006 * Enlisted Record Brief * Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOERs) from March 2008 to January 2015 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013467

    Original file (20070013467.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a self-authored letter, dated 15 September 2007; a copy of General Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 5 January 2001; and two letters of recommendation from his battalion commander and battalion command sergeant major (CSM), in support of his application. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that General Court-Martial Orders are filed on the P fiche when there is an approved finding of guilty on at least one specification. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021743

    Original file (20130021743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests General Court-Martial Order Number 91, dated 28 March 2003, be transferred from the performance portion to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF). A civilian applying for the warrant officer program with conduct or even criminal charges must obtain the same moral waiver; however, these charges would never be viewable to the promotion board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016785

    Original file (20080016785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Summary Court-Martial sentence be reduced on the basis of clemency. The applicant submitted a copy of a memorandum dated 31 March 2005, subject: Judge Advocate Review of the Summary Court-Martial which states that the applicant's Summary Court-Martial is legally sufficient and the law requires no corrective action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017478

    Original file (20090017478.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he did just that and was told by the Troop D, 73rd Cavalry, unit 1SG that the unit would look into the matter. The applicant submitted the following in support of his request: a. DA Form 4430 (Department of the Army Report of Result of Trial); b. promotion orders for E-5, dated 20 May 2004, and promotion orders for E-6, dated 18 October 2007; c. DA Form 2627, dated 12 June 2006; d. orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Bronze Star Medal; e. PCS orders to Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016712

    Original file (20090016712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that all traces of his court-martial should be removed from his OMPF or, if this is not possible, the court-martial documents should be transferred to the restricted portion of his OMPF because his NCOERs since that time show his professionalism and dedication to duty, but he has twice failed to be selected for promotion to SFC (E-7). The evidence of record shows that the court-martial order, dated 16 October 2003, is properly filed in the performance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020073

    Original file (20100020073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 2004, he was promoted to the rank/grade of captain/O-3 in the USAR as a military intelligence (MI) officer. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...