Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017534
Original file (20110017534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 October 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017534 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the unsigned version of Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be removed and replaced by the signed version.  

2.  He states that the orders for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (2d Award) without the approval authority's signature only indicate that the award wasn't processed or approved.  The award orders were sent by mistake to his records.  

3.  He provides:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (2d Award) orders without signature
* Army Good Conduct Medal (2d Award) orders with signature
* Email message from Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4.  

2.  Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 August 2008 through 6 August 2011.  These orders were filed in his OMPF and were not signed by the approval authority.  
3.  A second copy of Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 August 2008 through 6 August 2011, were signed by the appropriate approval authority.  These orders were not filed in his OMPF.  

4.  In a 17 August 2011 email message, an HRC representative informed the applicant that they only remove "exact" duplicates [orders].  He was advised that if he wished to have one order removed, he must contact this Board.  

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records), provides in Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) that award orders are filed in the Commendatory and Disciplinary portion of the OMPF.  This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) by Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, for the period 7 August 2008 through 6 August 2011.  These orders were erroneously filed in the applicant's OMPF without the signature of the approval authority.  

2.  The applicant provided another copy of Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, which included the signature of the approval authority.  However, these orders were not filed in his OMPF.  Therefore, there is a viable reason for removing the unsigned copy of Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, from the applicant's OMPF.  These orders offer no relevant information regarding whether the applicant's award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) was approved.  Moreover, removing this erroneous order and replacing it with the signed version would eliminate the potential for confusion to officials authorized to review the performance section of the applicant's OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the unsigned version of Permanent Orders 161-03, dated 10 June 2011, from his OMPF and replacing it with the signed version.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017534





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017534



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022448

    Original file (20100022448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * her initial appeal packet was returned without action in August 2008 due to insufficient evidence * the NCOERs were biased due to a Inspector General (IG) complaint and were prepared in retaliation of her grievance * her gathering of documents under the Freedom of Information Act caused her appeal to go past the 3-year limitation for NCOER appeals * she signed NCOER #1 on 25 August 2006, but the version in her OMPF is unsigned * the two contested NCOERs contained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019453

    Original file (20110019453.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019453 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant received award of the Army Commendation Medal and later received the Bronze Star Medal for the same act, achievement, and period of meritorious service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing DA Form 4980-14 Permanent Orders Number 076-039,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018197

    Original file (20100018197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be corrected by: a. removing the following six permanent orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM): B069-26 for 2d award, B178-51 for 3d award, B178-52 for 4th award, 339-009 for 4th award, 147-39 for 5th award, 320-01 for 6th award; and b. replacing them with the following six orders correcting or showing the correct dates of the award of the AGCM: 167-06 for the 2d award, B178-52 for the 3d award,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022130

    Original file (20100022130.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 May 2001 to 23 May 2004 under Permanent Orders 210-005, dated 28 July 2004. The evidence of record also shows the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 24 May 2004 to 23 May 2007 under Permanent Orders 254-07, dated 11 September 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004896

    Original file (20150004896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a memorandum unfavorably considering him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). The applicant states: * the memorandum disqualifying him from award of the Army Good Conduct Medal was not written and submitted in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraphs 4-8c and d * the memorandum refers to the wrong Army regulation and does not include the period of disqualification * it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016983

    Original file (20070016983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant continues that a memorandum for the disqualification of the first award for the Army Good Conduct Medal was erroneously filed in his MPRJ (Military Personnel Jacket Record) and in the performance section of his OMPF. The applicant contends that the memorandum of disqualification, dated 9 February 2001, for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, filed in the performance portion of his OMPF should be removed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040003228C070208

    Original file (040003228C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and issue of the certificate reflecting that award. It appears that at the time the applicant departed WRAMC, an award recommendation was either lost, as the applicant contends, or his services for the period of his assignment to WRAMC inadvertently overlooked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. entering in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000039

    Original file (20100000039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain the following orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal: a. 502nd Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders 297-40, dated 23 October 1996, awarded the Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 8 July 1993 through 7 July 1996; b. Qualifying periods of service must be continuous enlisted active Federal military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084708C070212

    Original file (2003084708C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Based on the foregoing, the Chief of the Military Awards Branch recommended that the applicant's request should be denied, that he should receive the Army Commendation Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) approved by the Commanding General of the 5th Signal Command on 9 May 2002, and that the applicant's servicing personnel center should correct his official records to show this award. COL R, as the Chief of Staff and Headquarters Commandant of the 5th Signal Command at that time, indicated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007015

    Original file (20100007015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007015 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests erroneous Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) orders be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Permanent Orders 028-010, dated 8 May 2009, and Permanent Orders 236-03, dated 24 August 2009, from the applicant's OMPF.