Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017186
Original file (20110017186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017186 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 2011 from his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states his OMPF contains a DD Form 214 that shows he retired on 31 July 2011.  However, orders dated 15 July 2011 revoked his previously approved voluntary retirement and he is currently serving on active duty.

3.  The applicant provides:

* an email, subject:  Approved Withdrawal for (applicant's name), dated
13 July 2011
* Orders 196-0502, issued by the U.S. Army Combined Arms Support Command, Fort Lee, VA, dated 15 July 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a field artillery second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve and he executed a
DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) on 14 May 1993.  On
12 February 2004, he executed another DA Form 71 for appointment as a Regular Army officer in the rank/grade of major (MAJ)/O-4 in the Logistics Corps.  He served in various staff and leadership positions as a Regular Army officer in the Logistics Corps.
2.  His request for a voluntary retirement was approved and he was scheduled to retire on 31 July 2011.  His record contains:

* Permanent Orders Number 312-0503, issued by the U.S. Army Combined Arms Support Command, Fort Lee, VA, dated 8 November 2010, authorizing his retirement
* a DD Form 214, dated 25 April 2011, wherein he was retired from active duty as of 31 July 2011

3.  He subsequently submitted a request to withdraw his voluntary retirement, which was approved.  As a result, Orders 196-0502, dated 15 July 2011, was published revoking Orders 312-0503, dated 8 November 2010, pertaining to the applicant's retirement.

4.  He was promoted to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 on 1 September 2011.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records), chapter 2, governs the composition of the OMPF and states that the performance section is used for filing performance, commendatory, and disciplinary data.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.  The document will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by certain agencies, to include this Board.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant's retirement orders were appropriately revoked based on the approved withdrawal of his retirement.  He continues to serve on active duty.  His DD Form 214 remains filed in his OMPF.  However, his DD Form 214 should be removed from his OMPF.  His retirement orders and the associated revocation orders should also be removed from his OMPF to avoid any confusion.

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  __x______  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from his OMPF:

* Orders 312-0503, issued by the U.S. Army Combined Arms Center, Fort Lee, dated 8 November 2010
* Orders 196-0502, issued by the same headquarters, dated 15 July 2011
* the DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 July 2011



      _________x_____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017186



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017186



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002786

    Original file (20080002786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his Date Entered Military Service (DIEMS) as 1 September 1979; and that his retirement pay plan be changed from High-Three to Final Pay based on his DIEMS date. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Statement; Electronic Mail (e-mail); Military Personnel (MILPER) Message (MSG) Number (#) 03-102, dated 26 February 2003; Enlistment Contract (DD Forms 4/1 through 4/4);...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105701C070208

    Original file (2004105701C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 4991-R (Declination of Continued Service Statement) and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued for the period of service 17 August 1995 to 17 January 2002 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). AR 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides that the Declination of Continued Service Statement will be removed upon an individual being separated from service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090480C070212

    Original file (2003090480C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he submitted a request to withdraw his retirement orders with the support of his commander but the Retirements and Separations Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) denied it. The applicant provides a copy of a memorandum, dated 24 March 2003, from his former brigade commander in support of the request to terminate the applicant's approved retirement and reinstatement him on the SGM promotion list. The applicant's contentions have been noted; however, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012725

    Original file (20130012725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 January 2013, by memorandum, an official at HRC Promotions Branch notified the applicant that as a result of his failure to meet the NCOES requirements of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-27b(2), his promotion orders to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 have been revoked, effective 7 February 2012 and with a date of rank of 1 January 2004. b. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES requirements for promotion and conditional promotions), a Soldier must be a USASMC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022129

    Original file (20120022129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his: * retirement application and orders * request for withdrawal of retirement * removal from promotion selection list * post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of benefit approval * request for retirement and promotion determination * HRC IG finding CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 12 (Retirement for Length of Service), provides in: a. paragraph 12-8 (Service obligations), subparagraph d,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007118

    Original file (20140007118.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her retirement date from 30 June 2011 to 30 December 2010; b. removal of the flag from her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) and Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); c. removal of all actions pertaining to this situation from her restricted records; and d. remission of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) debt due to the simultaneous payment of retired pay and active duty pay during her extension on active duty for medical evaluation. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000798

    Original file (20130000798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An MFR, dated 11 October 2011, from the staff psychiatrist at the U.S. Army Medical Department Activity stated the applicant had been diagnosed with depression and depression due to a general medical condition. The MEB found the applicant's following conditions as medically acceptable: * ankylosing spondylitis * depression 7. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711643

    Original file (9711643.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 March 1993 the 122 nd ARCOM requested that the 271 st Maintenance Company initiate action to remove the applicant from his ART position based on his reassignment from that unit [loss of dual status with the 271 st ]. The official from USARCOM repeated the information concerning the applicant’s assignment to the 271 st , acceptance and appointment as a CSM, assignment to the 810 th , imminent loss of his civilian position at the 271 st , withdrawal from the CSM program, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015862

    Original file (20080015862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 February 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015862 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a memorandum, subject: Notification and Acknowledgement of Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Professional Filler Deployment System (PDS) PROFIS; a Personnel Action and a Personnel Action Form Addendum; his orders for deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, dated 5 April 2007; a memorandum, subject: Administrative Removal from the Promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067967C070402

    Original file (2002067967C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army regulations clearly state, “an officer will not be retained without his or her written consent.” The Board was not present when his retirement orders were revoked nor does the Board have a consent statement on file. In a statement dated 31 May 1996, the retirement analyst said that he requested revocation of the applicant’s “retirement orders” and they were revoked on 18 May 1996. Notwithstanding the foregoing, considering the date the applicant signed the consent statement (17 May...